Magua
Entirely Palatable Product
His preoccupation with size and strength and how it matters more than skill and speed
But Tuomaala was an all skill/speed pick. He’s not big or strong — or in possession of functional hockey IQ. Which is sort of the issue in that it doesn’t matter what archetype he targets (although it’s not coincidence Tuomaala was considered a “sniper”). Flahr is a basic evaluator who, in my opinion, is easily misled by shiny attributes and prone to compartmentalizing. I don’t think he’s wedded to size; it’s more that he and Fletcher believe(d) in fit and you need to draft X amount of Type A and Y amount of of Type B, etc. And they had their Type A’s. I bet anything Brink factored into Stankoven.
Tuomaala for example didn’t have a great scoring junior season but had a productive u18s (I say productive and not good because I watched him and came away shrugging). 2 years later, tell me which was the better predictor. This was also the Covid draft year, which he said wasn’t a good draft (it was), and they made the safest picks they watched the most.