Player Discussion K'Andre Miller

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,210
57,228
In High Altitoad
The thing with Miller for me was you saw enough great plays to make you think he had the potential, and just needed the reps. I said all along the guy was a BEAST in college at breaking up zone entries--one of the absolute best in the country. So, it's not surprising to see once he adjusted and gained in confidence, that he is showing the same in the NHL. He also really excelled at controlled exits and entries in college, so it's only a matter of time before he takes off there, too (we've already seen some of those rushes that he's so good at with his speed/strength/reach combo).

He was given A LOT to do as a rookie.

Top 4 minutes straight from NCAA with zero training camp. Under normal circumstances, its very possible that he would have started in the A.

I never really understood the hate that he got last year. Yes he had some shit moments, all rookies do but it got to the point where he would be blamed for things that weren't his fault (He got blamed for a goal against at one point that he wasn't even on the ice for!) Its even carried over to this season and there are still a group of fans who cannot wait to jump on him when ever he makes a mistake.

Glad he got all of those reps last year though because it paid off this year. His entries and exit numbers will improve dramatically if Gallant lets him loose and allows him to rush the puck out of his own end. Hes not bad passing it out, but he will be much better if hes able to skate it out and carry it in or skate it out and then pass it as hes moving up ice. He hasn't truly been "unleashed" in that regard and Im sure some of that is due to his own reservations, but they need to encourage this to become a thing. Trouba kind of carried the load between the two of them when it came to pushing pucks up ice (and did a decent job during the RS, I don't know what the playoff numbers looked like.) There should really be more balance there, if not a heavier shift towards K'Andre doing the work.
 

Off Sides

Registered User
Sep 8, 2008
9,755
5,585
I kind of remember arguing that the Rangers should not put an established vet LD in front of Miller. More so someone he would compete with instead of by default playing behind. They signed Nemeth.

I'd argue the same this off-season. While Jones does not have the same amount of NHL games played as Miller did, I think he deserves a chance to compete with Hajek/Tinordi for a spot and if he can't win that spot, at least at some point during this season, I'd be a little surprised.
 

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,233
5,200
I kind of remember arguing that the Rangers should not put an established vet LD in front of Miller. More so someone he would compete with instead of by default playing behind. They signed Nemeth.

I'd argue the same this off-season. While Jones does not have the same amount of NHL games played as Miller did, I think he deserves a chance to compete with Hajek/Tinordi for a spot and if he can't win that spot, at least at some point during this season, I'd be a little surprised.
I mean thats seems like what we're doing. We moved Nemeth because he was terrible. We haven't made any LD add's.
Its Jones/Robertson/Nils in the competition for that 6th spot.
 

JohnC

Registered User
Jan 26, 2013
8,728
6,537
New York
The defense next season should be KAM-Fox, Lindgren/Trouba, Jones/Schneider.

Tbh the team’s LD is extremely versatile. There’s no reason you can’t roll with those as the pairings and change em up as the game situation calls for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDirtyH

Lays

Registered User
Jan 22, 2017
13,558
12,637
Miller - Fox gonna be the best pairing in hockey soon.
Lindgren Fox is never being broken up

Also I’d rather have two elite pairings rather than a ridiculously stacked one. Lindgren-Fox is already one of the best pairs in the league and they’ll continue improving

Miller-Trouba was fantastic last season, both players seemed to get the best out of one another
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,210
57,228
In High Altitoad
It’s easy to forget because of how well he played in the playoffs (especially considering that he was physically compromised) but Lindgren was straight ass during the regular season last year. I hope we get playoff Lindgren for the whole season next year.

I have no issue keeping the top 4 as is for now. Miller-Fox would probably be amazing, but it can wait another year as well. The changes on D I want to see are really usage things:

- Schneider eating into Fox’s PK minutes
- Jones taking all of Troubas PP minutes. Trouba should never see another second of PP time unless there are injuries.
 

LoveGoons

Registered User
Mar 3, 2021
263
192
1st I love Fox/lindgren pairing
But they are
undersized and get abuse by either the elite top lines or a really good down low forechecking lines.

The only answers to that
Fox put on 20lbs
bigger partner for Fox
Or a
Paired forward line that that has skill and grit..
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Filthy Dangles

chosen

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
12,543
5,016
ASPG
The thing with Miller for me was you saw enough great plays to make you think he had the potential, and just needed the reps. I said all along the guy was a BEAST in college at breaking up zone entries--one of the absolute best in the country. So, it's not surprising to see once he adjusted and gained in confidence, that he is showing the same in the NHL. He also really excelled at controlled exits and entries in college, so it's only a matter of time before he takes off there, too (we've already seen some of those rushes that he's so good at with his speed/strength/reach combo).
Being great in college doesn't necessarily mean you'll be great in the NHL.

Better than Makar and Toews? You are a bit off there.
Tough to say better, but comparable could be quite possible.
 

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,233
5,200
Being great in college doesn't necessarily mean you'll be great in the NHL.


Tough to say better, but comparable could be quite possible.
I love fox - lindgren. They are nowhere in the realm of makar and toews.
Makar and toews were the best defensive pairing in the NHL by a significant margin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbassler

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
46,162
34,209
Maryland
Being great in college doesn't necessarily mean you'll be great in the NHL.


Tough to say better, but comparable could be quite possible.
You're right, it doesn't necessarily mean that. But it does for K'Andre. I'd wager a lot on it.
 

Levitate

Registered User
Jul 29, 2004
31,443
8,791
I love fox - lindgren. They are nowhere in the realm of makar and toews.
Makar and toews were the best defensive pairing in the NHL by a significant margin.
Miller-Fox could be up there

I like Lindgren sometimes but to the extent he helps anchor the pair, he also is the weak link in the pair.

Miller-Fox could be something else and a more dominant 1st pairing that can't be shut down and can shut others down

Lindgren/Trouba could be a pretty good 2nd pairing that takes a little less responsibility and takes those minutes a bit better

But unlikely for it to happen. Fox should be pushing Makar every year for best D in the league but honestly think Lindgren holds him back just a bit
 

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,233
5,200
Miller-Fox could be up there

I like Lindgren sometimes but to the extent he helps anchor the pair, he also is the weak link in the pair.

Miller-Fox could be something else and a more dominant 1st pairing that can't be shut down and can shut others down

Lindgren/Trouba could be a pretty good 2nd pairing that takes a little less responsibility and takes those minutes a bit better

But unlikely for it to happen. Fox should be pushing Makar every year for best D in the league but honestly think Lindgren holds him back just a bit
Fox had a subpar year this year likely due to injuries. He had plenty of games where he wasn’t Norris caliber.
Makar had an unreal year.
Fox may always be a candidate for the Norris but makar is capable of running away w it every year….
 

The Crypto Guy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
28,307
36,915
Personally, i'd rather keep Miller/Trouba and Fox/Lindgren together. It's worked well. Very balanced pairing as well with a puck moving dman and physical dman on each.

Both pairs eat up huge minutes. Late in a game maybe Miller/Fox.
 

leetch99

Leetch66 Joined 2007
Oct 5, 2017
3,824
3,606
PEI Canada
Lock this kid up ASAP for as long as possible . We have all watched him takes off with the puck albeit rare . He can skate...has the reach and size and eventually the offense will arrive . He quite possibly could be as valuable as Fox/Shesty/Laff over the next 5 seasons.....gotta lock him down soon . I would like to see a bit more physicality from him but I think that will come over the next 2 seasons as well....not Trouba like but just show a wee bit of nastiness . Great draft pick by the Rangers .
 

Vitto79

Registered User
May 24, 2008
27,563
3,787
Sarnia
I figure W the cap buyouts off next year , cap increase and Reaves/Blais/Halak out that’s like 9 million to sign Laf and Miller

Gonna have to bridge then use cheap deals in the other roster spots
 

chosen

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
12,543
5,016
ASPG
You're right, it doesn't necessarily mean that. But it does for K'Andre. I'd wager a lot on it.
I cited what you used as reasoning. Even if it applies to Miller, it doesn't mean it's an accurate predictor.
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,210
57,228
In High Altitoad
The Rangers will have 19 million+ in cap space going into next summer. That will be more than enough to get Laf and Miller signed. You could even get one (or perhaps) both signed for pretty long term and still have a decent amount of space to play with. A ton of replacements for guys going out are going to come in house or won't be overly expensive to begin with.

22 million if they move Lindgren as well.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad