GoldenBearHockey
Registered User
- Jan 6, 2014
- 10,409
- 4,386
I was surprised to find out they were both lefties on the top pairingNo idea why I thought he was a righty....
Bergevin’s role as the boogeyman who ruined an “up-and-coming” Kings team is way overstated simply because he’s one of the few LA guys that East Coast fans are familiar with and because people legit hate the guy for the Mailloux pick.I agree with item 1 completely- even long time canadien fans were saying that the apperantly non sensical moves that were and are being made have bergevins fingerprints all over them. Just look at the results of his tenure in montreal and unfortunately we're headed for the same.
As far as item2 the aquisition of turcotte my thought was that the boys were just doing a favor for his dad alfy- i dont know the connection but by history these guys are like humane relations hiring dept for unemployed and unemployable (recent asst coach) boys from theold network.
I have alot of respct for jon rosen- compared to what we have now rosen was the dan jenkins of kings hockey writers.
I agree. I wish I could remember my exact list, but I remember thinking Zegras was closer to Robbie Schremp than an NHLer. I know, I underestimated him, but agree that he has a lot of maturing to do.I am still not convinced that Zegras would have been a better pick than Turcotte. He isn't necessarily the kind of player you want in your organization regardless of ability. Dude has a LOT of growing up to do and isn't in a hurry to do so.
I agree. I wish I could remember my exact list, but I remember thinking Zegras was closer to Robbie Schremp than an NHLer. I know, I underestimated him, but agree that he has a lot of maturing to do.
I do still honestly think Turcotte's biggest issue is health. While not *as* skilled, his skillset isn't holding him back.
Though now I wish the Kings had taken Boldy or Seider, especially with how high I ranked them. I would have felt smart
How high up was Cozens up your list? I’m a fan of his overall game. I always trade for him in Franchise mode lol so I have a 1-2 punch of Byfield-Cozens.I agree. I wish I could remember my exact list, but I remember thinking Zegras was closer to Robbie Schremp than an NHLer. I know, I underestimated him, but agree that he has a lot of maturing to do.
I do still honestly think Turcotte's biggest issue is health. While not *as* skilled, his skillset isn't holding him back.
Though now I wish the Kings had taken Boldy or Seider, especially with how high I ranked them. I would have felt smart
I don't remember where exactly, but I wasn't nearly as high on him as others were. It was probably between 9-12ish.How high up was Cozens up your list? I’m a fan of his overall game. I always trade for him in Franchise mode lol so I have a 1-2 punch of Byfield-Cozens.
Huh, that was a genius its too late, lets fail for draft position move in my book.You left off Willy D, the single worst coach in NHL history. The hire alone should've got Blake canned.
Nah just a zoomed in screen cap - quick and dirtywhat the f*** is this, youtube 2003?
So you write authoritatively that bergevin has nothing to do with this mess because he did not call a press conference and issue a media release that its his responsibility for this mess. Who is responsible? Or is it a team effort of dunces? Everywhere ive been part of or led a group of people working towards a common goal responsibility must be fixed on an individual for its success or failure. Otherwize chaos.Bergevin’s role as the boogeyman who ruined an “up-and-coming” Kings team is way overstated simply because he’s one of the few LA guys that East Coast fans are familiar with and because people legit hate the guy for the Mailloux pick.
We’ve never seen any indication that he has any actual decision making power in the front office. He’s never done an interview, doesn’t appear in any of the behind the scenes puff pieces they do and has generally been a ghost since he was hired. To me, it seems like a classic case of Luc hiring his old frat bro to keep him gainfully employed by an NHL club and all he has to do is watch a couple hockey games and drink with the boys. It’s nepotism, but he’s not the man behind the curtain steering the club into the black hole.
Huh, that was a genius its too late, lets fail for draft position move in my book.
Huh, that was a genius its too late, lets fail for draft position move in my book.
Rooting against your team and hoping they lose?!? You are NOT a true fan.Huh, that was a genius its too late, lets fail for draft position move in my book.
So 3 months and 13 games after signing Ilya Kovalchuk to a 3 year $19m deal to bolster a playoff roster, the Kings were in full tank mode?
I can't say definitively if they were or weren't but there's a totally credible narrative that accounts for a full timeline of events that supports the theory and it's not "Pravda" to consider it legitimate.So 3 months and 13 games after signing Ilya Kovalchuk to a 3 year $19m deal to bolster a playoff roster, the Kings were in full tank mode?
Does this include the Pacioretty deal?I can't say definitively if they were or weren't but there's a totally credible narrative that accounts for a full timeline of events that supports the theory and it's not "Pravda" to consider it legitimate.
Hey, don't forget he moved Gaborik, who was looking down a back surgery that would have given the team LTIR cap space, for a fully cooked player with a worse contract in Phaneuf, despite already having 4 LHD on the roster before buying him out.This is one of the more absurd arguments from the revisionists around here.
Blake took control and publicly stated the team was a contender. He then made several moves (like Kovalchuk) consistent with a team attempting to contend.
Now some claim there was never any intention to contend, and what we see with our eyes and hear with our ears is false.
Ministry of Truth in full swing.
IF Pacioretty was ever actually going to sign that deal THEN we could worry about that trade but since he was never going to I don't know why everybody keeps pearl clutching about it.Does this include the Pacioretty deal?
Rooting against your team and hoping they lose?!? You are NOT a true fan.
(lol, you literally tell people now that same exact thing WRT the FO boozos smh).
This is one of the more absurd arguments from the revisionists around here.
Blake took control and publicly stated the team was a contender. He then made several moves (like Kovalchuk) consistent with a team attempting to contend.
Now some claim there was never any intention to contend, and what we see with our eyes and hear with our ears is false.
Ministry of Truth in full swing.
I can't say definitively if they were or weren't but there's a totally credible narrative that accounts for a full timeline of events that supports the theory and it's not "Pravda" to consider it legitimate.
Well, we are discussing intentions here so it's an important note that the agent (guess who) was trying to bring Kovalchuk and Pacioretty in as a package deal and the timing was urgent to have the cap space ready as soon as free agency started.IF Pacioretty was ever actually going to sign that deal THEN we could worry about that trade but since he was never going to I don't know why everybody keeps pearl clutching about it.
But generally speaking no it doesn't... that's a good wrinkle
I get it and you're not going to get a ton of push back from me on itWell, we are discussing intentions here so it's an important note that the agent (guess who) was trying to bring Kovalchuk and Pacioretty in as a package deal and the timing was urgent to have the cap space ready as soon as free agency started.
Whether they couldn't get it done is a different aspect of the conversation, but the goal was to bring in instant offense at the cost of the futures involved in the Montreal deal.
Their intentions didnt change. They wanted a goal scorer, failed to get Pachioretty and pivoted to plan b in Kovulchuk.I get it and you're not going to get a ton of push back from me on it
BUT
it was all contingent on someone agreeing to something that they didn't agree to
you can have all the intention you want but if you don't have willing partners then your intentions frequently change