Player Discussion Kaiden Guhle

Hannibal

Fear the Weber
Feb 11, 2007
11,173
8,789
He’s very impressive.

Can’t wait that he finds his physical side again. Dude was a killing machine in the WHL. Gain muscle mass buddy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sagikev and BLONG7

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
36,901
23,578
Nova Scotia
Visit site
He could be our franchise D if he stay healthy. This is probably is biggest concern.


The Habs hfboard members would have gone insane with him, Kotkaniemi and Drouin on the same team!🔥
Adding a few pounds to his frame would go a long way.......just a few.
Kid can skate, and lead or join in the play.............he is going to be good guys, real good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rahad

rahad

Registered User
Feb 3, 2016
2,025
2,461
montreal
Adding a few pounds to his frame would go a long way.......just a few.
Kid can skate, and lead or join in the play.............he is going to be good guys, real good.
He is very good. Very few player can jump from the Junior to the NHL with out going to the AHL.
 

KevSkillz4

Registered User
Apr 11, 2016
8,136
13,706
No doubt if he stay healthy, him and David Reinbacher will be the face of the defensive group for many years to come.

They have both potential to play on 1st pair, they are both play great two-way game, they are both have great skating ability, they are both mature and they will be very very fun to watch for many years to come.

The only thing that scare me... is the injuries.

Guhle and Reinbacher make less pressure to another young D to develop their games, they are both safe young players with huge potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rahad

Vachon23

Registered User
Oct 14, 2015
19,230
23,540
Victoriaville
Adding a few pounds to his frame would go a long way.......just a few.
Kid can skate, and lead or join in the play.............he is going to be good guys, real good.
He will get stronger with maturity but U don’t think it’s a good idea that he adds to much pounds since he could loose some mobility
 

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
40,075
14,771
I was so mad they picked him.

So happy I was wrong on this one. Hes insanely good.
If I remember, I was kind of indifferent to his selection. Everyone knew he'd be an NHLer, but was one of those high floor, low ceiling types. Or so we thought. He's a smart player. He's got solid tools. He's poised. He's mature. There's a lot to like about him and he's probably got more upside than we thought. Maybe the Weber comparisons weren't just stylistic, but potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: windycity

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,953
59,023
Citizen of the world
If I remember, I was kind of indifferent to his selection. Everyone knew he'd be an NHLer, but was one of those high floor, low ceiling types. Or so we thought. He's a smart player. He's got solid tools. He's poised. He's mature. There's a lot to like about him and he's probably got more upside than we thought. Maybe the Weber comparisons weren't just stylistic, but potential.
Hes definetelyt got more upside than I thought. I thought he was a 2nd pairing type of guy that would give us 25-35 points.

Man, Im not even sure Id put a cap on his potential. I wonder if there's a norris in there.
 

MXD

Partying Hard
Oct 27, 2005
51,744
17,656
Hes definetelyt got more upside than I thought. I thought he was a 2nd pairing type of guy that would give us 25-35 points.

Man, Im not even sure Id put a cap on his potential. I wonder if there's a norris in there.
McDonagh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrb1p

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
40,075
14,771
Hes definetelyt got more upside than I thought. I thought he was a 2nd pairing type of guy that would give us 25-35 points.

Man, Im not even sure Id put a cap on his potential. I wonder if there's a norris in there.
I really see Weber-level upside now more than ever. If we can count on him for 50-60 points, leadership , and a solid defensive presence, then this was a homerun pick.
 

Andrei79

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
16,462
30,591
To think the Leafs and Oilers passed on him.

They could have had both Guhle, Dobson and Caufield. Brutal. They would only need a goaltender as they'd be deep and scary fast at all positions.

While I think new management has been an improvement over the MB years, this is why I feel people have a good basis around their criticism: you can't fail at the draft like that. It's the difference between a cup and wasting years of a stars prime.
 

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
15,328
11,842
I gotta say most people here were shitting on this pick draft day. We're never happy about drafting dmen. I don't think I'd take anyone drafted after him over him now. Mercer is not an impact player. Getting 50 points on a team with Jack Hughes is just a thing that will happen. Toffoli is looking to have a career year after displacing Mercer out of the Devils top 6. Mercer hasn't gotten a single point.

For me I think it's more just how high do you go in that draft before finding someone you take over Guhle? For me he's top 5 at worst. Sanderson has the experience over him because Guhle has hit several injuries. Stutzle is the only no-brainer in the entire class. This is one of the first times we hit hard on a first rounder in a long time.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,953
59,023
Citizen of the world
McDonagh.
McDonagh had one year where he was insanely good, 2016. I do think Guhle has more than McDonagh in him. He faster, bigger, stronger, has a better shot and hes just a more poised player.
I really see Weber-level upside now more than ever. If we can count on him for 50-60 points, leadership , and a solid defensive presence, then this was a homerun pick.
Then again, Weber was never the skater Guhle is. Sky is the limit.
I gotta say most people here were shitting on this pick draft day. We're never happy about drafting dmen. I don't think I'd take anyone drafted after him over him now. Mercer is not an impact player. Getting 50 points on a team with Jack Hughes is just a thing that will happen. Toffoli is looking to have a career year after displacing Mercer out of the Devils top 6. Mercer hasn't gotten a single point.

For me I think it's more just how high do you go in that draft before finding someone you take over Guhle? For me he's top 5 at worst. Sanderson has the experience over him because Guhle has hit several injuries. Stutzle is the only no-brainer in the entire class. This is one of the first times we hit hard on a first rounder in a long time.
I was probably the most vocal one. Feels so good to be wrong. I kept saying that you didn't need a guy like Guhle in the top 20, that there was a lot of similar player to him later, Schneider, Barron, Faber, etc.

I was just wrong on my evaluation of Guhle or whatever, he's a top pair D. Stutzle is the only one I'd take ahead of him. Sanderson played more games and produced more points but his totals are mega inflated vs Guhle who has lower totals because he's on a worse team/not as lucky. Even counting this year and adding it to last, with injuries, Guhle has more primary 5v5 points than Sanderson.

12 5V5 primary points vs 13 for guhle. 85 games vs 48 games.

21 even strengths vs 19.

We also hit like this the year before though, Caufield goes up really high, but there's more competition because that was just a better draft. He probably ends up top 5 regardless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: x-bob

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad