ASmileyFace
Landeskog Replacement
A few days? If the NHL's goal is to drag this out till he hits the 8 game mark they are doing a great job.
i thought there was also a timeline when it comes to re-offending?Repeat offender status only affects your pay.
its this kinda shit right here..A few days? If the NHL's goal is to drag this out till he hits the 8 game mark they are doing a great job.
like someone said, by the time he gets a decision, it will be eight games alreadyA few days? If the NHL's goal is to drag this out till he hits the 8 game mark they are doing a great job.
Funny, I keep hearing that Sheifele wasn't a repeat offender which is why his hit was only 4 games.Repeat offender status only affects your pay.
I know that is supposed to be the intent, but I don't buy this personally which is why I believe they gave Kadri the length they did. Scheiff's hit was worse than Kadri's and on face value alone should have gotten more. I am perfectly fine with that though.Repeat offender status only affects your pay.
Nope. History is always taken into consideration. Repeat offender status just means you lose more money in a suspension.i thought there was also a timeline when it comes to re-offending?
I mean a 4 game suspension in the playoffs for a first time offender is a pretty hefty suspension.Funny, I keep hearing that Sheifele wasn't a repeat offender which is why his hit was only 4 games.
Feels like this idea is pretty selectively applied.
Nope. History is always taken into consideration. Repeat offender status just means you lose more money in a suspension.
I mean a 4 game suspension in the playoffs for a first time offender is a pretty hefty suspension.
4 games is the baseline for that hit in this instance. Because this was his first suspension they give him that baseline but if others with a history make that hit, the suspension will very likely increase due to their history.First time offender? What does that have to do with it?
The point is that there is an official status of repeat offender for financial matters relating to suspensions. But, disciplinary history is taken into account informally for handing out suspensions.What is history without repeat offender status? This is a distinction without a difference.
They should rephrase the term because it's confusing. You always have history and the history always affects your suspension length.What is history without repeat offender status? This is a distinction without a difference.
The point is that there is an official status of repeat offender for financial matters relating to suspensions. But, disciplinary history is taken into account informally for handing out suspensions.
If someone who had been suspended multiple times had done what Scheifele did he would've gotten a bigger suspension?First time offender? What does that have to do with it?
They should rephrase the term because it's confusing. You always have history and the history always affects your suspension length.
The difference:
"Non-repeat offenders lose salary based on the number of days in the season. For example, if there are 190 days in a season, a three game suspension would cost a non-repeat offender 3/190ths of his average salary.
Repeat offenders lose salary based on the number of games in a season (82). For example, a three game suspension would cost a repeat offender 3/82nds of his average salary."
If someone who had been suspended multiple times had done what Scheifele did he would've gotten a bigger suspension?
Maybe I don’t understand your question. I just wanted to highlight that the formal definition of “repeat offender” only exist and apply to financial matters.I must not be smart enough to understand the difference. How do you "repeat" something without there being a "history" of it? Linear time is confusing AF.
I think you're overthinking it a little bit too much.Right, I get this. I understand that "repeat offender" has some official meaning when it comes to compensation during suspensions.
What I don't get is how it can ALSO be claimed that repeat offender status is NOT considered during discipline review.
Repeat offender status only affects your pay.
How does that jibe with "repeat offender status only affects your pay?"
Seems like it also affects the length of your suspensions as well.
I think you're overthinking it a little bit too much.
Every incident-less 18 months you lose the "repeat offender" tag. So if you go 18 months without a suspension your next one will affect your salary less on a game to game basis. But the suspension history still matters when it comes to determining how long you will be suspended for.How does that jibe with "repeat offender status only affects your pay?"
Seems like it also affects the length of your suspensions as well.