Semantics
PUBLIC ENEMY #1
The first three games should be more proof that neither Naz, nor Bozak are 1st line NHL centers on any decent team.
Not to mention proof that McDavid is a bust and Abdelkader is the best forward in the league.
The first three games should be more proof that neither Naz, nor Bozak are 1st line NHL centers on any decent team.
The first three games should be more proof that neither Naz, nor Bozak are 1st line NHL centers on any decent team.
Yeah cause 3 games that 2 centers played on an awful team is a perfectly reasonable sample size.
Sometimes I think I might have more respect for some of these haters if they'd just be honest and tell us what is it that they really have against Nazem as the statistical arguments they present to prove he's nothing more than a 3rd line player are worthy.
Sometimes I think I might have more respect for some of these haters if they'd just be honest and tell us what is it that they really have against Nazem as the statistical arguments they present to prove he's nothing more than a 3rd line player are worthy.
Neither side is innocent in this and far to eager to claim victory. Bozak and Kadri will likely swap the top line multiple times before this season is out.
Personally I think most of complaints about Kadri are because his most vocal supporters will twist anything to make him look good and others bad. I have no doubt if the roles were reversed and Bozak started on the top line instead and had the same results as Kadri we'd have a very different conversation.
Kadri is snake bitten right now has been for a while really, he has all the talent but he's not getting it all to come together, if Bozak and JVR stay together I'd like to see if Lupul can spark him as he has in the past.
What victory? Why can't players be judged on their own merits? I personally hope all our players do well, that includes both Bozak and Kadri.
Trying to figure out what smells worse seems kind of pointless.
Has it ever occurred to anyone that maybe BOTH Kadri and Bozak aren't cut out for top-six duties in the NHL?
No?
Well maybe it should.
Additonally, debating which is better/worse using *insert here* useless stat does nothing to prove they are, in fact, good hockey players
Trying to figure out what smells worse seems kind of pointless.
Has it ever occurred to anyone that maybe BOTH Kadri and Bozak aren't cut out for top-six duties in the NHL?
No?
Well maybe it should.
Additonally, debating which is better/worse using *insert here* useless stat does nothing to prove they are, in fact, good hockey players
Is point production a "useless stat"? Because Kadri has three consecutive seasons of top six point production.
By what criteria isn't he one?
Trying to figure out what smells worse seems kind of pointless.
Has it ever occurred to anyone that maybe BOTH Kadri and Bozak aren't cut out for top-six duties in the NHL?
No?
Well maybe it should.
Additonally, debating which is better/worse using *insert here* useless stat does nothing to prove they are, in fact, good hockey players
I'm pretty sure over 60 other centermen had more points last year.
Nope.
He also missed 9 games and played with Clarkson most of the year.
Nope.
He also missed 9 games and played with Clarkson most of the year.
Nope.
2nd most shots on net in the league after Patrick Kane. I guess none were of any quality.
Really, I guess the website I just counted (61 C with more points last year) was wrong. Games missed, while relevant, also needs to be taken into context as many other Centermen lost games as well (3-4 other C tied him in points on the year). He also didnt play with Clarkson most of the year due to his trade in February, and the fact Clarkson was tried on different lines. Also thats irrelevant when someone makes a statement of "top 6 production last 3 years". But keep trying to make strawman arguments.
Really, I guess the website I just counted (61 C with more points last year) was wrong. Games missed, while relevant, also needs to be taken into context as many other Centermen lost games as well (3-4 other C tied him in points on the year). He also didnt play with Clarkson most of the year due to his trade in February, and the fact Clarkson was tried on different lines. Also thats irrelevant when someone makes a statement of "top 6 production last 3 years". But keep trying to make strawman arguments.
You can't say "nope" and drop the mic, especially when it's easy to check whether Kadri was indeed top 60 in points by a centre last year.
Although only three games, I was obviously hoping for more from Kadri. 0 ES points, team worst -5, 42% in the dot while only averaging 16 1/2 mins a game. The 14 shots is great, but the results aren't there and at 25 now, with over 250 NHL games and over 100 in the minors, I would not say he has exactly ceased the opportunity he has been given this season. At some point, his brain needs to catch up with his talent and play a complete game if he honestly believes he will be a #1 centre.
He was given a "show-me" contract imo...still hoping he puts it together, but tough start if this is what he is trying to show.
Outscoring Crosby so far though, that's not too shabby.
Seriously though, please stop with the #1 centre talk. ( Unless you honestly think that's what the expectations should be.)