-You expect one single player's possession numbers to change the fortunes of an entire team? Leafs went from one of the worst possession teams to the 13th best
-There are tons of good 2 way players that don't PK. Kadri was the #1C responsible for supplying all the offence last year. Why waste your number 1 offensive resource on the PK? He was excellent both ways 5 on 5. Look at his shot supression and takeaway numbers.
-Compared to his career shooting % he had an unlucky year. We aren't comparing him to Ovi here. We are comparing Kadri 2016 to past Kadri shooting.
-That was 2014/2015 man.
And this is the biggest point.
-So? He plays on the edge. Is that a bad thing? Keith is one of the dirtiest players in the NHL. Does that make him a bad player.
Duncan Keith cost his team a game in the playoffs because of his dirty play. Keith is an amazing player, one of the best D in the NHL. Does that make him a bad player?
The advanced stats bit was just me being an ass, and I apologize for that. If one thinks advanced stats are worth something than I can see why one might have a higher opinion of Kadri than those who don't.
I have a few problem with this whole #1C argument. You want to give Kadri the benefit of being a #1C, and how thats his excuse for not being a PK player. Yet this #1C only put up 45 points. Its no secret this was a development year for the Leafs, and long term Kadri is going to be a 2, ideally 3C. He's not a 60 point 1C. Might as well teach him to kill penalties, because if not he's significant;y less useful in those spots.
You want to say his shooting percentage should stay the same. But the thing is he shot 90 more times this past season than before. Thats a lot. Its not wonder his percentage took a hit. You don't just add that many shots and expect the percentage to stay the same. A good chunk of those are obviously of lower quality.
Keith can get a pass because he's a top 5 defenceman in this league. Do you think Chicago likes that he's dirty? **** no. But they put up with it because of how good he is. Kadri is barely a 2C, so he shouldn't get a pass for being dirty. He's easily replaceable, Keith isn't.
39 players were suspended last year should they all be traded.....
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/...tracker-fine-raffi-torres-money-number-games/
27 the year before
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/2014-15-nhl-suspension-tracker/
Take a minute to read the names. Theres a lot of big name players in there.
People get suspended it happens you move on and Continue. Now if you can find me a quote of him saying ya the guy deserved it and **** it then I would agree. I would prefer some one who gets angry and passionate about the game over someone who floats out there for a paycheck.
How many of those players have been suspended multiple times? How many of those players have been fined for diving? How many of those players have been suspended by their own teams? Kadri getting suspended once isn't an issue on its own. The problem becomes when you add up everything, you get a guy with character issues.
Kadri was 49.2% on faceoffs last season while effectively playing as the #1 centre. That is hardly awful.
Also, who cares if he doesn't kill penalties? It's quite common for forwards who play a lot on the PP to not kill a lot of penalties.
I can't believe there are some suggestions to trade him for picks. If you want to trade him for something of need, such as young defenceman, I can understand that. There is zero urgency to give him away for draft picks.
It may not be awful, but its certainly not good. If your 1C is only putting up 45 points then you expect him to excel in other areas. One of those is faceoffs.
Again, he plays a lot of PP time but doesn't put up a lot of points. He won't be getting that kind of ice time long term. I addressed this earlier in my post, but he should be a guy thats killing penalties long term. The fact that he wasn't trusted to do that this year worries me.