SA16
Sixstring
“Positive” would have sufficed. No need to be unpleasant. Frankly, you’re attempting to counter a normative statement with a positive one, which is irrelevant.
Seems like there was indeed something difficult to understand here.
“Positive” would have sufficed. No need to be unpleasant. Frankly, you’re attempting to counter a normative statement with a positive one, which is irrelevant.
Indeed: your attempt to prove by induction. In case that’s too complicated: Problem of induction - WikipediaSeems like there was indeed something difficult to understand here.
Why don´t you give up already?Indeed: your attempt to prove by induction. In case that’s too complicated: Problem of induction - Wikipedia
Sigh. Another fan of inductive reasoning?Why don´t you give up already?
I'm very familiar with proving by induction, but TBH I don't get why you're talking nonsense after making a poor statement.Indeed: your attempt to prove by induction. In case that’s too complicated: Problem of induction - Wikipedia
I just can´t be bothered to read all this bickeringSigh. Another fan of inductive reasoning?![]()
Which is the poor statement? If you don’t feel Kakko will benefit from AHL time, I can certainly respect that, but I don’t understand the need to talk down to a total stranger who’s done nothing to you (in the royal sense).I'm very familiar with proving by induction, but TBH I don't get why you're talking nonsense after making a poor statement.
The truth is, this isn't maths. And Kakko won't benefit from playing in AHL.
Also, it's you who'd need to prove that Kakko would benefit from playing in AHL. So what's your method of proving it? Induction won't even work, so...
I can get behind that.I just can´t be bothered to read all this bickering![]()
Well, none of us is drunk and humble-bragging about the crazy hours at our Goldman internship over the summer, so I’m afraid you’re mistaken.Y'all sound like first year law students and that's not a compliment.
What do you think forums are for? People disagree with you, I'd suggest you get over it instead of making a number of it - you've not even brought up any points to counter with.Which is the poor statement? If you don’t feel Kakko will benefit from AHL time, I can certainly respect that, but I don’t understand the need to talk down to a total stranger who’s done nothing to you (in the royal sense).
Not at all, they just need to memorize and read a lot.Y'all sound like first year law students and that's not a compliment.
You're confusing law school and B-school...Well, none of us is drunk and humble-bragging about the crazy hours at our Goldman internship over the summer, so I’m afraid you’re mistaken.![]()
The arrogance of Legal at a BB investment bank is the stuff of nightmares.You're confusing law school and B-school...
I feel for the people who bought 45 Kakko Jerseys, how do I change my HF username?
He's playing for his next contract.Kakko will have a hard debut on that line - Kreider will be playing a typical US engine well not a Tesla, but on 75% he knows he is gone in March next year - so he will try to avoid injury.
You have to write a letter to the postmaster general.I feel for the people who bought 45 Kakko Jerseys, how do I change my HF username?
Hanging it proudly alongside my Kasparaitis #72 jersey and my Fast #91 jersey.Actually in about 5-10 years a #45 kakko jersey will be all the rage