Luke DeCock: Justin Faulk Speculation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ole Gil

Registered User
May 9, 2009
5,765
9,204
I'd rather have Faulk than a kase. The team has 8 top 6 at least. And 12 top 9. And a couple guys knocking on the door.

The forwards are deeper than the D now for good nhl talent now, I think.

Priskie and Bean could change that, but it's a gamble that seems unnecessary.
 

My Special Purpose

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
8,151
21,787
  • Like
Reactions: jayhamm and zman77

Big Daddy Cane

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2010
14,069
34,278
Western PA
Honest question does Faulk at any number between 6.5m - 7m making him our highest paid defender seem attractive to anyone here? Cause its a big no from me.

It depends on term. 5-8 years at that price is a no for one of the few Faulk defenders on the board. 3-4 years is justifiable, imo. That's better than paying Hamilton $8 mil or more on a max term deal or thereabouts.
 

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
25,500
92,982
It depends on term. 5-8 years at that price is a no for one of the few Faulk defenders on the board. 3-4 years is justifiable, imo. That's better than paying Hamilton $8 mil or more on a max term deal or thereabouts.
Yeah I'm sorry... A contract that pays Faulk over $1m AAV more than any of our other defenders for any extended period of time is a big nopes from me. Especially when those other defenders are Slavin, Hamilton, Pesce, and Gardiner
 

My Special Purpose

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
8,151
21,787
I'd rather have Faulk than a kase. The team has 8 top 6 at least. And 12 top 9. And a couple guys knocking on the door.

The forwards are deeper than the D now for good nhl talent now, I think.

Priskie and Bean could change that, but it's a gamble that seems unnecessary.

According to many (mostly stats-focused) folks in the media, we already have the best top four in the league on defense. Add to that a guy who is quite possibly the best third-pairing d-man in the league (TvR) and I'm pretty sure one of us can be our sixth d-man and we'd still have one of the best defensive units in the league. But as it is, we can choose between a former No. 7 overall pick (Fleury), a former No. 13 overall pick (Bean), a Hobey Baker finalist (Priskie), a guy who played big minutes in the SHL at age 19 (Sellgren), Gustav Forsling or Roland McKeown for that spot. And that's *without* Faulk.

We're pretty deep at forward, but not *that* deep. Although, it's pretty close.

It's a really great problem to have.
 

My Special Purpose

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
8,151
21,787
Starting to think Faulk to Anaheim won't happen

What he gains from a list like mine is control. He is not going anywhere he doesn't want to go because the options he gave the team are not realistic options unless the team cuts off its nose to spite its face. Sure, they could pay one of those teams to take him...some certainly would find a way if rewarded to do so...but the Canes management is not going to do something like that. Instead, they would do what they did with Faulk and Ferland last year and just get the value they have in him already.

It's Anaheim or the coldest most depressing city not on the NTC.

Your move, Faulk

The way the team (evidently) framed the leak to Lebrun is that Faulk has a choice of Anaheim with an extension or someplace else without one.

But Faulk's agent probably isn't worried, since a team on his trade list will probably ask for (and receive) permission to discuss an extension before giving anything up for him. Unless they make it conditional ... so the team still has a little bit of leverage here.

Yeah, this whole post was pretty much just me thinking this through and typing at the same time. But I'm not deleting it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MinJerkBen

Big Daddy Cane

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2010
14,069
34,278
Western PA
Yeah I'm sorry... A contract that pays Faulk over $1m AAV more than any of our other defenders for any extended period of time is a big nopes from me. Especially when those other defenders are Slavin, Hamilton, Pesce, and Gardiner

I don't think it's fair to use long-term 2nd contracts coming out of entry-level as a benchmark for someone coming off of one of those deals. It took an extremely unfriendly market for Gardiner to sign for what he did. Hamilton may ask for twice as much as Pesce makes on a long-term deal next Summer a year away from UFA. That's not the way to evaluate it.

A raise for Faulk is fine, if they're getting a shorter commitment out of it, imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boom Boom Apathy
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad