The data from last year doesn't support that. Worst SH% on the PP by defenders with > 100min. of PP TOI last year:
Leddy: 0% in 232 min.
S. Jones: 0% in 175 min.
DeAnglelo: 0%
Girard: 0%
Sergachev: 0%
Gardiner: 0% in 115 min.
Keith: 0% in 113 min.
Provorov: 0% in 127 min.
Ristolainen: 2.3% in 233 min.
.
.
.
#44 out of 69: Faulk: 9.84% in 241 min.
Other notable guys with a worse SH% than Faulk on the PP: Shattenkirk, Josi, Klefbom, Ellis, Chabot, Byfuglien, Fowler, Krug, Barrie, Butcher, Nurse, Montour, Giordano, Gostisbhere, Subban, E. Karlsson, Seabrook, Hedman, Severson, Werenski, Dunn, Carlson, Letang, Rielly, and Suter. (among others). A guy taking a lot of shots from the point is going to have a poor shooting % because those are more low % shots. But, looking at shots taken and sticking with guys who took a lot of shots (> 40) last year, Faulk's numbers aren't that out of whack.
Ghost: 6.15%
Faulk: 9.84%
Burns: 11.84%
Yandle: 12.73%
Giordano: 5.77%
Josi: 4.0%
OEL: 10.2%
Ristolainen: 2.2%
Theodore: 9.1%
Severson: 6.98%
Krug: 4.76%
Hamilton: 4.76%
Klingberg: 11.9%
Barrie: 5.0%
Don't get me wrong, I don't think Faulk is a PPQB or a stud on the PP, but he can STILL score goals from the point if used in the right way. I can see why a reporter would call him an "Ace" because of his goal scoring.