Miller Time
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2004
- 24,200
- 17,055
LOL, strange sentence.We need to stop focusing on other players and making sure own players become very good contributor.
I think it’s pretty clear Cooley has higher offensive upside but Slafkovsky brings a big body. We will see how that plays out since their outcome are totally unclear at this point.Logan Cooley with 2 assists in his first NHL game. It's gonna be hard but I think he'll outproduce Slaf this year, but Slaf's ceiling will take longer to reach but the reward might be better too. I'm confident in Slaf's progression. What do you all think?
I think it’s pretty clear Cooley has higher offensive upside but Slafkovsky brings a big body. We will see how that plays out since their outcome are totally unclear at this point.
We, as fans.LOL, strange sentence.
The CLUB staff, not FANS, focus on making sure our own players become very contributors. So when you say "we", I assume you are part of the Habs' Player Development group.
But then the CLUB also has a department that focuses on other teams' players, called Pro Scouting. They provide information that helps Kent Hughes in making trades, signing UFAs and evaluating waiver pickups. So when you say "we" , should I assume you are also part of the Pro Scouting group?
Who exactly is the "we" that is in both groups, besides yourself?
Yeah not his best game but he wasn't bad still one of our better forwards , I'd like to see him with Monahan I believe he was playing with Newhook as C alot but then again MSL was shuffling the lines all game
This is hilarious.We, as fans.
We have to support our own players.
We have no control in player development but we do have control in players confidence/support. If we start booing our own players, it can have a negative effect on their performance/mental.
I have seen way too many times the same scenario, we always see other prospects we could have selected and start complaining forgetting the bigger picture, we can still have a good player on our hand.
Contraire, it had huge effect on MANY former great prospect we had. We have not the most patient fanbase and we still have a bad reputation as one of the toughest place to play. It's way easier to develop in Arizona than under the spotlight in Montreal.This is hilarious.
I'm all for cheering our own players, it's part of cheering for your team.
But no, the fans have no control over the players becoming as good as they can become. Maybe .05% of influence. Or less. But "control"? you must be kidding.
I am pretty sure the booing last night will not affect how Bedard develops.
Are you serious? You state that the Habs did not listen to the fans then you say the fans "almost" got rid of Price.We almost got rid of Price at some point and if the decision was made by the fans and not the GM, they would have 100% shipped him out and kept Halak.
obviously fan have no direct impact on players development, what more can I tell you? but the fact remain that expectations in Montreal are greater than elsewhere for a top prospect.Are you serious? You state that the Habs did not listen to the fans then you say the fans "almost" got rid of Price.
I'm done shining the light on your ridiculous statement that "we" should not focus on other players but should focus on developing our own.
Admit you stated it badly, and that what you meant is that as fans of the Habs, we should not be focused no whether other prospects would have been better to have, but rather to cheer our own and hope that our management team develops them the best they can.
Jonathan Drouin did not fail here because he was booed.Contraire, it had huge effect on MANY former great prospect we had. We have not the most patient fanbase and we still have a bad reputation as one of the toughest place to play. It's way easier to develop in Arizona than under the spotlight in Montreal.
We almost got rid of Price at some point and if the decision was made by the fans and not the GM, they would have 100% shipped him out and kept Halak.
I will give you one stats, in the last 30 years we have developed 3 players that we can label them as success in the first round. Price, Pacioretty and Caufield. All other prospects failed and under performed and were shipped out or developed elsewhere (McDonagh and Sergachev). I know part of the blame is the scouting team but I also believe that the environment is also not favorable for top prospect to perform because of the added pressure by the fanbase and their expectations. I also believe that the management also take that in consideration when they decide on which player to draft.
Montreal will eat you alive at any misstep. No doubt that if Slafkovsky would have been drafted anywhere but Montreal, he would not feel that added pressure. I am sure Kotkaniemi is happy to be out of Montreal and not have to feel like he is the worst player ever because he is not Brady Tkachuk or Quinn Hughes.
I think you underrate the impact of the pressure of the fanbase/media, especially when you are not the best player drafted. I think Caufield had less pressure on his shoulder because there are no player selected behind him that is clearly better than him, otherwise you would still have some fans complaining. The fans always expect every pick to have been the best possible player. I remember when KK was still with the Habs, you would listen to the media and fans on the radio and they would destroy him. He cannot skate, not physical enough, a bad pick. Every player are responsible for their success/development but in Montreal you also have to consider the pressure of the fanbase. It does affect the players, it's not normal to have that many failed in the first round pick and it's not just scouting or development.Jonathan Drouin did not fail here because he was booed.
Jonathan Drouin got booed, a little, AFTER years of failure. Then the booing stopped after the mental health issues became public, and Drouin still failed on the ice.
The fans have little control over development! We are not that important.
Kotkaniemi was never once booed or crapped on by fans. He was of course negatively affected by the pressure FROM HIS NEANDERTHAL COACHES, not the fans, while the GM supported the ineffective tactics of the coaches. Andf maybe he was also partly responsible for is own stagnation due to working less hard than guys like Caufield and Suzuki and Harvey-Pinard at getting better.
He is young. which means he needs to be taught how to use his huge frame to his advantageWhen he has an opportunity to go to the front of the net from behind the net, he needs to take it.
He needs to use his body more effectively to shield the puck. Monahan does a better job than him.
He needs to generally drive the net and shoot much more.
19 years old. it's comingWhen he has an opportunity to go to the front of the net from behind the net, he needs to take it.
He needs to use his body more effectively to shield the puck. Monahan does a better job than him.
He needs to generally drive the net and shoot much more.
It’s things I don’t expect from Suzuki or Caufield, it’s not their makeup. But it’s absolutely Slaf’s, and he’s really putting a ceiling on his effectiveness if he doesn’t.He is young. which means he needs to be taught how to use his huge frame to his advantage
Some of it is psychological. You either force yourself to the net with the puck or you don’t.19 years old. it's coming
A lot of the psychological aspect could be attributed to not wanting to create a turnover. And we also see a lot of that with his forechecking, he isn't pressuring as hard or finishing his checks like we would want and it looks like it's a case of not wanting to take himself out of position. So yeah he needs to impose himself more and drive the net with the puck, but it's something that will probably come with experience. Let's not forget when playing in Finland where it was all about playing the trap, that don't cause a turnover is what was being driven into him. It simply takes time to unlearn/adjust to a different style of play.It’s things I don’t expect from Suzuki or Caufield, it’s not their makeup. But it’s absolutely Slaf’s, and he’s really putting a ceiling on his effectiveness if he doesn’t.
Some of it is psychological. You either force yourself to the net with the puck or you don’t.