Lafleurs Guy
Guuuuuuuy!
- Jul 20, 2007
- 77,181
- 48,151
12 in his last 19. That would be a 52 point pace.
The lines tonight were Caufield-Suzuki-Anderson and Slaf-Monahan-ArmiaI caught bits and pieces did he get moved off the top line or was there just juggling going on
What a surprise. Slaf is great and Anderson is awful.
No, stop putting our 1st overall pick with a plug winger and a guy you’re showcasing for a trade. Newhook can take that spot on the 2nd.Newhook might be the answer to replace Anderson on the 1st line then
Well Monahan isn’t traded yet. Perfect center to play with Slaf to me.No, stop putting our 1st overall pick with a plug winger and a guy you’re showcasing for a trade. Newhook can take that spot on the 2nd.
I have a feeling Suzuki's influence is all over the demotion. I have no evidence for this. Just a gut feeling based on their vibe on the ice. I think Suzuki asked to have Anderson back on the line. Either way, I also agree with your post and assessment. I actually would rather have him play with Monahan. I was never a fan of making Nick captain, tbh. Not ready or mature enough in my view.Well Monahan isn’t traded yet. Perfect center to play with Slaf to me.
And Playing on the 2nd line isn’t bad …. Being on the 1st line with Suzuki and Caufield always brings the tough matchups.
Slaf will develop nicely on the second line for now. To be re-evaluated when Monahan is dealt .
It’s the other way around. Nick said they were doing good with Slaf and that it’s probably only to shake things off, not permanent.I have a feeling Suzuki's influence is all over the demotion. I have no evidence for this. Just a gut feeling based on their vibe on the ice. I think Suzuki asked to have Anderson back on the line. Either way, I also agree with your post and assessment. I actually would rather have him play with Monahan. I was never a fan of making Nick captain, tbh. Not ready or mature enough in my view.
Good to know. Guess I read it wrong. That's reassuring to hear.It’s the other way around. Nick said they were doing good with Slaf and that it’s probably only to shake things off, not permanent.
If anything he was down playing Anderson. Who would want the worse player on their line.
Hopefully Newhook is back at the pointWell Monahan isn’t traded yet. Perfect center to play with Slaf to me.
And Playing on the 2nd line isn’t bad …. Being on the 1st line with Suzuki and Caufield always brings the tough matchups.
Slaf will develop nicely on the second line for now. To be re-evaluated when Monahan is dealt .
He was drafted and publicly described as a project. Finishing with 35 points, especially after a slow start shows great progression. The stat progression also matches the one we see via our eyes.I mean I can also set incredibly low bars and say something is successful
if I make it to 10am without crying my day will be a success
I get your point, but that is just disappointment in both.Guess Who?
Player 1: 46 GP, 8 G, 17 Pts, -12, (Career 365 NHL games)
Player 2: 48 GP, 6 G, 19 Pts, -15, (Career 87 NHL games)
35 would be good as that means 16 points in the next 34 games. I am hoping for 40pts. If they put him back with Cole and Nick once Monahan is traded, I think that is very realistic. That would be very good for a 19y/o.earlier in the year, I said I successful season would be 10g and 30-35points.
He's on his way to doing that. If he could surpass those totals, that would be amazing. He's been playing so well. I really can't wait to see what he becomes in 2 years.
You sure set the bar for the quality of your posts real low.I mean I can also set incredibly low bars and say something is successful
if I make it to 10am without crying my day will be a success
Player 1: KotkaniemiGuess Who?
Player 1: 46 GP, 8 G, 17 Pts, -12, (Career 365 NHL games)
Player 2: 48 GP, 6 G, 19 Pts, -15, (Career 87 NHL games)
Define 'incredibly low bars'I mean I can also set incredibly low bars and say something is successful
if I make it to 10am without crying my day will be a success
Define 'incredibly low bars'
Define what your bars would be
And.. sorry about your 'problem'..
Slaf has, after last night game, 19 pts and played 87 NHL games so far.Y’a but the stats you put for him a bit off lol