Goldenhands was categorically wrong on many things about Slafkovsky other than the Habs drafting him. My concerns have always been IQ related and unfortunately my concerns were undeniably correct. He also argued that Guhle wasn't a fast skater lol......
I have said repeatedly that the fact that Slaf doesn't demonstrate any IQ to speak of does not necessarily mean that he won't ever demonstrate it. There is a real possibility that it is a software issue that can be downloaded over time. If it is a serious hardware issue then he will bust because he processes the game at a low junior level.
Hopefully MSL, Nicholas and the rest of the development infrastructure can install the software that this kid desperately needs to survive in the NHL.
I hadn't watched him in Liiga but there was a glaring problem that nobody touched upon in any analysis (and I vociferously went through them): if he's so powerful and formidable physically, why did he struggle to put up points in Liiga? After months someone posted a few forum posts from a finnish hockey forum (I'm going off memory, so please forgive me if I got some details wrong) and an anonymous fan posted that Slaf seemed very gifted but was given a tight leash and a 3rd line role because of the nature of his team (TPS) and coach, and that he performed better in the playoffs when he was given a more prominent role.
All that said, it didn't explain the big gap between his stature and scouting report of his skills and his production. To me that gap is explained by Hockey IQ (or lack thereof).
Then came the NHL season and we all saw he was behind the play and took too long to process decisions. It put the Liiga (lack of) production in the same light: he's physically gifted and skates well for his size but he still hasn't figured out how to process the play. Obviously a well-meaning hockey fan would at that point say that the NHL is too fast paced and intense for someone with this skill gap, and they should find themselves in a different tier of play in order for them to work on specifically this aspect of their game. We do no have well-meaning fans, we have bitter fanboys who would rather argue up and down until they're blue in the face that the NHL is the best place for a player who is already behind the play to learn how to produce at a skill-player level... meanwhile he was getting pummeled with hits and indeed lost half a season from an injury derived from a physical encounter.
Do we want to produce a player who can stick his head above water and keep up or do we want someone to be the protagonist on the ice and be confident in their ability to make plays happen? When I played sports I was always the former type, figuratively fighting for my life, all it got me was to be very good at coping with the play until I was capable of occasionally being not the absolute worst guy on the pitch. I don't think Slafkovsky or the Habs deserve such an outcome. He should be the Big Man on the ice, call me a bad fan for thinking so.