That's a pretty confusing and conflicting stance to take. If you think he was rushed to the NHL then your expectations of what he is ready to do in the NHL should reflect that.
In sports you have to produce the goods. I know the regular season is essentially meaningless in North American professional sports but the fact is you don't ice a peewee team even if your organization seeks to tank and lose. We watch to enjoy the performance, we were cheering on the small bright spots last year weren't we?
If you're a player in the NHL, you're taking the job from another would-be NHLer. There is nothing confusing about this in my opinion: if you're in the NHL, you have to perform and produce (this goes double for top6 players or skill players). If you cannot perform or produce, you shouldn't be in the NHL. This is why I burned to stress that Slaf was not meant to be in the NHL last year.
What you want is to dream!
Do you want Lafrenière, highly ranked and highly hyped draft pick in his draft year?
Today your answer would be no, but the real answer is YES you would have like that.
If you look at the Top10 last year in the NHL for top point producers, the majority were not highly touted prospect and the majority were not good in their D+1, guess you don't want those
Lafrenière is an odd case but I would still want him today. I trust and believe in his pedigree -- I think there's something there. If Drouin got nearly 8 years of non-stop faith, Lafrenière should get at least four. Of course this could all change (and who knows if Lafrenière was rushed or not -- I haven't followed him closely to know).
Slafkovsky's D+1 has come and gone. Let's focus on the D+2, shall we? Do you not expect to see something good from him this year -- what are your expectations? Isn't it unusual there is no aura of greatness around him, just a lot of nervous consternation and strained convincing from the PR agents in the media?
If he's as good as he's meant to be why does it feel so strained?