- Jul 30, 2005
- 2,602
- 3,967
Impressive tournament from him. He showed his complete array of skills and smarts everywhere on the ice.
That golden goal play will live on.
That golden goal play will live on.
Tabarnac what a setup. Reminded me of Danult to Leky in the semi finals. I really like this kid.It's what I was thinking as well. I haven't much of him previously except in highlights but based on what I've seen in this tournament, he seems to have the same type of on ice intelligence and awareness. "Pourvu que ça dure" against the Czechs.
And insults the opposing fans.Except when Roy wins, he wears a fedora. When Kucherov wins, he shows up drunk and shirtless.![]()
Nice comparison.Futur Justin Williams
If this is the new approach of this new development team... then it's absolutely mind boggling that the previous crew wouldn't do this. Isn't this, like, the basic of development? Telling prospects what they need to work on?Engels was on Marinaro's podcast last night and he shared a story about Roy and giving an example of the Habs' new development and analytics team.
He said before the World Juniors, the Habs' development team went to watch Roy at Sherbrooke. They already know he's producing at will there. But when they went to watch him and in addition to the data they've gathered on him, they saw that he was producing, but he wasn't doing much else. He wasn't getting his nose dirty or going in the corners or to the net front traffic enough.
So they spoke to him and explained to him that they don't care about his production. They already know he can produce. But what they want to do is make him into an NHL player. So they explained to him what they want him to work on. And credit to Roy, he started to do that more. And his production didn't take a hit. He just became a more complete player.
And what we're seeing from him at the WJC is things the Canadiens asked him to do more of.
And Engels said they've done that with other prospects, as well.
Bedard is a big fan of Roy's. He said that Roy is someone he loves watching.
If this is the new approach of this new development team... then it's absolutely mind boggling that the previous crew wouldn't do this. Isn't this, like, the basic of development? Telling prospects what they need to work on?
If this is the new approach of this new development team... then it's absolutely mind boggling that the previous crew wouldn't do this. Isn't this, like, the basic of development? Telling prospects what they need to work on?
Insane how a billion dollar company invested so few in it's product...Yes. They just let the player do whatever.
Exactly.Our development management should have been better but thinking that they didn't talk to the players on what they need to work on in the past is clearly Bergevin hate and spinning things. It's mind boggling only because it's just not true. Truth is in the middle
At a minimum, you can say he’s a gamer.He played the two on one perfectly. Made the goalie commit to him until the last second. Great pass… Awesome tournament from him.
Roy now has a taste of winning. It’s an infectious condition and will spur on his drive to elevate his skills and conditioning. Roy showed a lot of his detractors, like this writer, that he has the stuff to play in the NHL. But Roy is a classic case that shows that the pace of a player’s development is never certain whether in the ascendancy or in the descent.Next Summer could be huge for Roy's career.
He will have 4.months to still working in his skating etc..
He admit that he was not training too hard 2 years ago and everything changed.when he was traded.to Sherbrooke.
Exactly.
The development team (Ramage, Lapointe and others) were all hired by Bergevin. They followed prospects, talked to them and all. These guys were kept on by the new management because they were doing well. Hugo added Poulin and Nicholas on top of it for the training sessions, which seem to be nice additions.
The hate is over the top when you feel the need to twist reality to fit your narrative. There were missing pieces in development during the MB era, but there were things in place.
Before MB, there was noone to go see the prospects and keep tabs with them. Believe it or not, it was even worse before MB era.
I don’t see it personally.I see similarities between Roy and Point - and if he gets anywhere near Point we'll be ecstatic.
I see similarities between Roy and Point - and if he gets anywhere near Point we'll be ecstatic.
He is nothing like Point as speed and agility are two major pillars in Point's game that Roy will never have.
Toffoli is an obvious comparison as is a smaller version of Mark Stone and a winger version of Ryan O'Reilly especially if Roy continues to fill out.
Well, Point after being drafted was a weak skater.. they worked hard and had development programs/skating coaches for him... turning what kept him drafted low into a strength.
I don't know if we'll see the same thing here with Roy, but it's an important distinction.
Where would you peg Roy’s progress in terms of skating ability? He didn’t seem overwhelmed by the blistering pace of opponents in the WJC. Also, how much of his skating improvement would you say, is imputable to the Habs’ development contingent?Well, Point after being drafted was a weak skater.. they worked hard and had development programs/skating coaches for him... turning what kept him drafted low into a strength.
I don't know if we'll see the same thing here with Roy, but it's an important distinction.
I think we have to be realistic here. In the 2018 NHL All-Star Fastest Skater Competition, Point finished second to Conner McDavid by about 1/10th of a second. I think any sane person would agree that Roy, despite his recent progress, is not only 1/10th a second slower than McDavid. The attempted comparisons between Roy and Point, is charitably, misguided. I'm an old timer, I think Roy reminds me of Danny Grant, another smart, skilled player, who, though not blessed with blazing speed, used guile, anticipation and strong hand skills to carve out a nice NHL career. But to talk about Roy and Point as being somewhat similar, is frankly: embarrassing.I see similarities between Roy and Point - and if he gets anywhere near Point we'll be ecstatic.
Where would you peg Roy’s progress in terms of skating ability? He didn’t seem overwhelmed by the blistering pace of opponents in the WJC. Also, how much of his skating improvement would you say, is imputable to the Habs’ development contingent?
If this is the new approach of this new development team... then it's absolutely mind boggling that the previous crew wouldn't do this. Isn't this, like, the basic of development? Telling prospects what they need to work on?