Scriptor
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2014
- 8,176
- 5,144
No, he's just a stupid jock and didn't realize he played the whole season on the PKUmmm didn’t he say he actually never played PK before???
![Wink ;) ;)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@14.0.2/assets/72x72/1f609.png)
No, he's just a stupid jock and didn't realize he played the whole season on the PKUmmm didn’t he say he actually never played PK before???
I'm really glad we might have an elite bottom-6 player to help round out our roster when we contend again.Farrell was never at the WJCs but he was at the Olympics and World Championships last year.
Both times he started on the 4th line and ended up being a key fixture on their PK and out there defending leads.
and he was very productive in a bottom 6 role both times.
View attachment 630659
Actually it does as it is an early indicator of the trend but it is only part of the equation and not the final productOlivier Archambault was also a first overall pick in the LHJMQ, junior draft pedigree means nothing
I'm really glad we might have an elite bottom-6 player to help round out our roster when we contend again.
I see that 4th line of Farrell - Beck - Heineman when we end up drafting both Bedard and Dvorsky as our eventual 1st and 3rd line Cs, with Suzuki playing the 2nd line C role and Dubois signing on as an UFA to be a power left wing in Montreal and a safety net at C in case of injuries. This will be the good times (as long as we can keep affording them under the Cap).
Dubois - Bedard - Roy
Caufield - Suzuki - Dach
Slafkovsky - Dvorsky - Mesar
Farrell - Beck - Heineman
We should make the playoffs as soon as we add Dubois as an UFA for the 2024-25 season. By then, playing Roy, Mesar, Dvorsky, Beck and Farrell won't be quite akin to rushing them to the NHL level.
Heineman should be ready to play in the NHL even before that (next season) with his years playing professional hockey against adults and his ability to be reliable defensively.
Even if we don't get to pick Bedard, Dubois can play C in the top-6, we still get an elite third line and ending a LW to play on the Dubois line is much easier than finding a C.
If Montreal acquires Dubois without losing any core youngsters, Montreal will be looking pretty any way you frame it.
Boy, are you going to be surprised in two, three years.
What totally blew my mind was the interview Roy gave in the second intermission. He said he never played PK before. Really! Roy is going to surprise a lot of people. This kid has elite hockey IQ. His skating can stand a little improvement but thankfully he is being monitored by Hugo's team and not Bergevin's. According to many of you, our development team has improved immensely. Let's see if that's true.
It is a spectrum but there are obvious indicators. To my knowledge, it affects fine motor skills more than anything especially as young kids and not all high functioning individuals are affected. A big difference would be how they view the game on the ice compared to you and I. Consider that the Israeli Army uses kids on the spectrum to analyse satellite photographs.We are talking about people on the fringe of the spectrum who can't even be accurately diagnosed though. These test results are for far more acute cases.
And who gonna be the goalie…I'm really glad we might have an elite bottom-6 player to help round out our roster when we contend again.
I see that 4th line of Farrell - Beck - Heineman when we end up drafting both Bedard and Dvorsky as our eventual 1st and 3rd line Cs, with Suzuki playing the 2nd line C role and Dubois signing on as an UFA to be a power left wing in Montreal and a safety net at C in case of injuries. This will be the good times (as long as we can keep affording them under the Cap).
Dubois - Bedard - Roy
Caufield - Suzuki - Dach
Slafkovsky - Dvorsky - Mesar
Farrell - Beck - Heineman
We should make the playoffs as soon as we add Dubois as an UFA for the 2024-25 season. By then, playing Roy, Mesar, Dvorsky, Beck and Farrell won't be quite akin to rushing them to the NHL level.
Heineman should be ready to play in the NHL even before that (next season) with his years playing professional hockey against adults and his ability to be reliable defensively.
Even if we don't get to pick Bedard, Dubois can play C in the top-6, we still get an elite third line and ending a LW to play on the Dubois line is much easier than finding a C.
If Montreal acquires Dubois without losing any core youngsters, Montreal will be looking pretty any way you frame it.
He's not but still really goodHe is as good of a prospect Kucherov was back in the days.
He is money
clutch playoff kind of player
In talk with Hyundai Canada too.He's already scheduled to make Wawanesa advertising, lol.
At
He puts the Waa in WahIn talk with Hyundai Canada too.
You’ll be getting tomatoesOf Beck Roy Farrell and Mesar:
Biggest lock to make NHL: Beck
Highest upside: Farrell
Roy and Mesar somewhere in the middle. As for Beck, I’m 100% sure he’s a player.
Roy I wasn’t sure about before this tournament but seeing how much he’s improved his skating and general player, I’m really starting to be convinced that he’s a 2nd or 3rd liner. Can move up and down and play PP/PK. I think the Toffoli comparison is excellent.
Mesar I still think has really high upside but I also think there’s a chance he never really plays. Saw some nice things from him this tournament.
Farrell for me is a wild card. I think he has incredible upside but I could see him never playing also. Just a feeling…
Very similar, and he's not a hot head like Kucherov.He is as good of a prospect Kucherov was back in the days.
He is money
He is as good of a prospect Kucherov was back in the days.
He is money