Prospect Info: Joshua Roy Part 2

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,919
59,000
Citizen of the world
What makes you say that?
He is a typical tools and IQ player, hes dominated his whole life on talent alone, now hes really learning the game and evolving his play. Hes a crazy smart player and he needs to use his size to protect pucks and cycle, hes also going to need to get stronger and the usual pro game evolution.

Hes a late round pick afterall, its a normal time-frame for him.
 

Skip Bayless

The Skip Bayless Show
Aug 28, 2014
21,911
25,744

Good, because he's your future line mate.
EV0CTHq.png
 

dackelljuneaubulis02

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
11,867
7,488

it's awesome to hear especially because some of the scouting reports I was hearing seemed to preclude this type of play from him i.e. High skill and IQ but lacking compete. The fact he's expanding his game to fit better with the team is what you want to hear.

I was getting a bit worried from what I was hearing but the other part of me was wondering if he was maybe being subject to some 'overshooting' kind of like Suze was. Still too early but the positives I'm hearing of late are reassuring. Him, Farrell, Beck and Mesar could really fill some spots in our top 9.
 

admiralcadillac

Registered User
Oct 22, 2017
7,677
6,984
it's awesome to hear especially because some of the scouting reports I was hearing seemed to preclude this type of play from him i.e. High skill and IQ but lacking compete. The fact he's expanding his game to fit better with the team is what you want to hear.

I was getting a bit worried from what I was hearing but the other part of me was wondering if he was maybe being subject to some 'overshooting' kind of like Suze was. Still too early but the positives I'm hearing of late are reassuring. Him, Farrell, Beck and Mesar could really fill some spots in our top 9.

People associate his lack of skating with a lack of work ethic. He was a bit of a shit skater (everything being relative) - I don’t know if it’s improved.
 

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,365
156,499
Bedard is amazing and special. But I know what McKenzie means by Roy being their best forward this far. Because he's being used in all situations.

He can be a Bottom-6 player and can be moved up to the top line. Play PK and PP.

He's Canada's most versatile forward.

I thought the above were your observations but instead of that, a TSN write-up makes the same points.

Must be a coincidence. :skeptic:
 

ZUKI

I hate the haters...
Oct 23, 2003
14,240
4,644
montreal
i don't think he was a shit skater last year, I think more mix up his style of play as he likes to slow things down, vs being a shit skater.
The previous season, he was in a bad shape . He has lost 25 pounds of fat during the summer . I suppose that his condition was the main problem of his skating
 
  • Like
Reactions: BehindTheTimes

jfm133

Registered User
Nov 6, 2015
2,594
1,738
Again, remember where Suzuki was at the exact same age as Roy is now. The knock on Suzuki back then was that he was not fast and dynamic enough, and that he had a tendency to slow the game down when he had the puck. After his WJC at 19.5 years old, many were decrying the trade with Vegas and said Bergevin made a big mistake. Then, when Suzuki bloomed into a really good young player, the same people said Bergevin was lucky and wanted Cody Glass instead.

I don't want to start another Bergevin discussion here. My point is that Suzuki at the same stage of his junior career was seen as a disapointment by many and if you look at Roy's path in comparison with Suzuki, the only big difference is their draft year at 17 yo year. At 16 they had similar stats, at 17 Suzuki was much better, then at 18 and 19 Roy and Suzuki were dominant players with their junior teams, and because of covid pushing the WJC to August, Roy played at the champinonship at just 19, and will play second time at 19.5, and he should have no problems matching Suzuki's output of 3 assists in 5 games. The unknown about Roy is to know if he will be able to take a big step up moving forward like Suzuki did in the OHL playoffs and then going directly to the NHL at 20.
 

DAChampion

Registered User
May 28, 2011
30,203
21,650
Again, remember where Suzuki was at the exact same age as Roy is now. The knock on Suzuki back then was that he was not fast and dynamic enough, and that he had a tendency to slow the game down when he had the puck. After his WJC at 19.5 years old, many were decrying the trade with Vegas and said Bergevin made a big mistake. Then, when Suzuki bloomed into a really good young player, the same people said Bergevin was lucky and wanted Cody Glass instead.

I don't want to start another Bergevin discussion here. My point is that Suzuki at the same stage of his junior career was seen as a disapointment by many and if you look at Roy's path in comparison with Suzuki, the only big difference is their draft year at 17 yo year. At 16 they had similar stats, at 17 Suzuki was much better, then at 18 and 19 Roy and Suzuki were dominant players with their junior teams, and because of covid pushing the WJC to August, Roy played at the champinonship at just 19, and will play second time at 19.5, and he should have no problems matching Suzuki's output of 3 assists in 5 games. The unknown about Roy is to know if he will be able to take a big step up moving forward like Suzuki did in the OHL playoffs and then going directly to the NHL at 20.

There are very few posters who are qualified to give meaningful opinions on young players. It simply takes a lot of time that most people don't have to watch prospects over a representative number of games, and further, it takes a modest amount of humility that many don't have to recognize that one has not put in the effort.

I know that you said that you didn't want to start another Bergevin debate, but to a large extent I think that's what that is. A lot of people project their general assessments of the managing and scouting staff onto young players.
 

SwiftyHab

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 18, 2004
4,877
9,570
Platinum Member
There are very few posters who are qualified to give meaningful opinions on young players. It simply takes a lot of time that most people don't have to watch prospects over a representative number of games, and further, it takes a modest amount of humility that many don't have to recognize that one has not put in the effort.

I know that you said that you didn't want to start another Bergevin debate, but to a large extent I think that's what that is. A lot of people project their general assessments of the managing and scouting staff onto young players.
People sharing and then arguing about their minimally informed opinions? Not on MY Internet!!
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Buffalo @ Eastern Michigan
    Buffalo @ Eastern Michigan
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $716.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Ohio @ Toledo
    Ohio @ Toledo
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $500.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad