Because he would make the Habs better? Caufield played 8 AHL games, Roy will play 15-20 AHL games at most.Why not?
Because he would make the Habs better? Caufield played 8 AHL games, Roy will play 15-20 AHL games at most.Why not?
"...but many here want him to stay in Laval just because he was a 5th round pick..."
That's unfounded take, IMO.Haven't heard anyone use the 5th rounder argument to keep him in Laval.
I think a lot of fans have been snake-bitten by the development of Galchenyuk (3rd OA), KK (3rd OA) and Slafkovsky as well (1stOA), last season where he might have done better with a stint in Laval. The early stay in Montreal has been a common factor for allegedly good talents who either clearly flopped, in the end, or took/are taking a long while to hit their next gear.
I say, let the player dominate until there is clearly nothing else to learn before moving him to the next level.
4 games are too few games to make a concerted opinion. If, by X-Mas, Roy is still dominating, by all means, please call him up. With the amount of confidence he'll have gained, he should be gangbusters once in Montreal under MSL.
Where are the legions who thought Farrell was better than Roy?
i said so a few years ago and most here called me a lunatic and brought back the WHeRe BROoK memes. he has it.Wawa will be a first liner. Fight me
"...but many here want him to stay in Laval just because he was a 5th round pick..."
That's unfounded take, IMO.Haven't heard anyone use the 5th rounder argument to keep him in Laval.
many here want him to stay in Laval just because he was a 5th round pick
Exactly."...but many here want him to stay in Laval just because he was a 5th round pick..."
That's unfounded take, IMO.Haven't heard anyone use the 5th rounder argument to keep him in Laval.
I say, let the player dominate until there is clearly nothing else to learn before moving him to the next level.
4 games are too few games to make a concerted opinion. If, by X-Mas, Roy is still dominating, by all means, please call him up. With the amount of confidence he'll have gained, he should be gangbusters once in Montreal under MSL.
Roy is destroying the "development" argument we can read so often here. This guy is a great talent since minor hockey, was first overall pick in the Q in 2019, Houle will not make or destroy him.
I agree not to call him up right now, because I believe in patience and in a step by step approach with young players, but many here want him to stay in Laval just because he was a 5th round pick and because they doubted him all the way up to what he is now.
Hey, compare Roy with Slaf, if AHL is good for Roy now, it should have been good for Slaf. Roy dominated the Q in his last two seasons, and he his on his way to dominate the AHL. That's the way it should be. Also, in the last two years I said many times here that he would improve on his weaknesses, and he did just that, but the elite talent was obvious all along, and remember that he just turned 20 last August.
I don't want to be disrespectful, but when's the last time you heard an NHL draftee's junior coach go out and say "this guy's a knucklehead and won't amount to shit?". What do junior coaches that never touched the NHL know about the NHL anyway?Former Roy's coach in Sherbrooke Stephane Julien gave an interview to Martin Lemay on Bpm Sports this week and he said:
That ....Roy has already a better hockey IQ than more than 80% NHL players.
Julien helped Roy a lot after his trade from St John to Sherbrooke.
IQ. Thats it.Everything seems so easy for Roy. It's crazy. He 's like a painter with the puck.
I don't want to be disrespectful, but when's the last time you heard an NHL draftee's junior coach go out and say "this guy's a knucklehead and won't amount to shit?". What do junior coaches that never touched the NHL know about the NHL anyway?
We're all idiots. Should be pretty evident to anyone that's spent more than 5 minutes here. Or just in society, overall.Agreed but what does that say about every IQ opinion posted here (and taken very seriously)
Keep him the AHL for the whole year. 4 good games doesn't make a player. Let him learn and grow. He'll be ready for the NHL next year.
I agree. Im an idiot, a very big one.We're all idiots. Should be pretty evident to anyone that's spent more than 5 minutes here. Or just in society, overall.
Why? Do you think the Habs make the playoffs with Roy?Ummmm no!
Just throw merit out the window and allow him to find ways to exploit the minor pro game that will be of no use to him in the NHL.....?
The sample is small but is also extremely convincing and he is certainly better than Slaf right now. I am fine with keeping him down for contractual reasons (I believe that keeping him under 40 NHL games is advantageous but can't remember why lol).
Saying that he must stay in Laval even if he keeps this up for the whole season is a developmental crime imo, especially when he is clearly better than a significant portion of your NHL roster.
Agreed but what does that say about every IQ opinion posted here (and taken very seriously)
What's best for Roy is to simmer down there. No need to call him up after a hot streak and send him back down when his confidence isn't there. That's Bergevin yo-yo-ing at it's finest.Because he would make the Habs better? Caufield played 8 AHL games, Roy will play 15-20 AHL games at most.
Why would it be a developmental crime? He'll be on the team next year. Leading Laval in points and being a top scorer in the AHL for 1 season (his first pro season nonetheless) is certainly not going to hurt his development in any way.Ummmm no!
Just throw merit out the window and allow him to find ways to exploit the minor pro game that will be of no use to him in the NHL.....?
The sample is small but is also extremely convincing and he is certainly better than Slaf right now. I am fine with keeping him down for contractual reasons (I believe that keeping him under 40 NHL games is advantageous but can't remember why lol).
Saying that he must stay in Laval even if he keeps this up for the whole season is a developmental crime imo, especially when he is clearly better than a significant portion of your NHL roster.
Why? Do you think the Habs make the playoffs with Roy?
He should stay down there with Farrell and the other guys, win the Calder Cup, and let the Habs draft high again. I think it's pretty obvious the Habs need another top 5 pick more than the 5-7 wins Roy might bring.
What's best for Roy is to simmer down there. No need to call him up after a hot streak and send him back down when his confidence isn't there. That's Bergevin yo-yo-ing at it's finest.
Why would it be a developmental crime? He'll be on the team next year. Leading Laval in points and being a top scorer in the AHL for 1 season (his first pro season nonetheless) is certainly not going to hurt his development in any way.
He's had 2 good games out of 4 played. He has not "conquered" the AHL yet by any stretch of the imagination.That is not how you develop prospects.
This is not a video game and you need to acquiesce to merit as players need to know that they are valued and are being handled fairly and professionally. Keeping a developing prospect at a level where that they have conquered while intentionally not challenging them at the appropriate level only slows development and any decision with such a result is objectively wrong.
Don't misunderstand me, as I believe he will be the exact same player 5 years down the road regardless of whether he plays in the NHL this season or not but part of the culture building exercise is holding merit above all else. The organization must let all of it's players know that they are competing for their jobs and playing time and will need to bring their "A" game or be replaced by the next wave who are working their asses off to earn that roster spot.
Everything is probably in slow motion for him, he's extremely quick with his reflexes and his thinking, that's why he's so clutch and I think what makes him elite, and it should transfer to the NHL as well. I think he'll be a top 6 player for us.Everything seems so easy for Roy. It's crazy. He 's like a painter with the puck.