- Apr 2, 2008
- 26,812
- 15,459
Considering he is 4 times the player it seems appropriate.Not their skill sets, but the fact both were given bad contracts, that they do not deserve
Let me remind you, Norris contract is twice the amount of what White's was
Scored 35 while pacing mid 40's. Even better.It's not like a bridge would have saved much either. He scored 35 goals in the NHL, that gets you paid, short or long term.
Still in shock we actually gave him a 8mill dollar contract. Talk about about jumping the gun there
We learnt nothing from Colin White's contract lol
AgreeNorris was out best faceoff guy before his injury. We will miss that.
As I mentioned earlier, the cap casualty on this team will be DeBrincat. I think that the 9M+ that will be needed to sign him will be used to sign Pinto, Zub and eventually Sanderson. Not to mention we don't have a second goalie next year. Unless they think Soogard or Mando are ready for the NHL.
DeBrincat is an RFA and with the right trade he could be exchanged for a top 4dman
That's because Norris is twice the player Colin White ever was. He is Ottawa's best two way centre, best faceoff guy & best defensive centre who just happened to also put up 35 goals last yr to lead the team.Not their skill sets, but the fact both were given bad contracts, that they do not deserve
Let me remind you, Norris contract is twice the amount of what White's was
Not sure how either one is going to replace Norris. They're not going to play centre.Happy to have Ridley Greig and Formenton as possible replacements - forward depth hasn’t been this good maybe ever and losing Norris is such terrible news, but he’ll be back for the playoffs and ready for action
Probably looked at that Andy & Rono Twitter post that pegged Norris as a 4m player somehow and refuses to adjust their viewNorris got a big contract after one good year.
So did batherson.
So did Chabot.
So did stutzle.
What's your focus on Norris?
Not sure how either one is going to replace Norris. They're not going to play centre.
Not sure how either one is going to replace Norris. They're not going to play centre.
Brassard is the top six injury replacement forward & Gambrell is the bottom six injury replacement forward, both can play centre or wing.
wtf is up with our players and shoulder injuries...
Might want to reassess our strength programming or something.
It doesn't matter, what does matter is that it was a smart move to sign Brassard & have him here as a replacement player with all his experience. Injury replacement players have to be prepared to play as long as the player is out, if they see that he can't handle all the games they still have Gambrell, Greig, Giroux & Kastelic in a pinch to fill in occasionally. They are well set depth wise at centre this yr.Brassard was meant to be a short-term injury replacement, though. I doubt Dorion wanted him playing 70+ games in the top 6.
It doesn't matter, what does matter is that it was a smart move to sign Brassard & have him here as a replacement player with all his experience. Injury replacement players have to be prepared to play as long as the player is out, if they see that he can't handle all the games they still have Gambrell, Greig, Giroux & Kastelic in a pinch to fill in occasionally. They are well set depth wise at centre this yr.
Ridley Greig is a Center
100 percent. All the bridge would have done was escorted him to UFA status, where he likely gets even more under an increased cap.It's not like a bridge would have saved much either. He scored 35 goals in the NHL, that gets you paid, short or long term.
He’s doing it in the A so he’s pretty close. Sliding him into the 3C and moving Pinto to 2C could be an easy solve for the coachIn the minors. I don't see him sticking at C in the bigs.
Why? He's a UFA veteran who is exactly the kind of player Sanderson's father asked PD to play him with. When that guy hit Sanderson high it was Hamonic who went after him, I doubt Brannstrom would have. If Hamonic is not re-signed I assume one of the two in Bellevile likely replaces him & would guess that would be JBD who is better defensively.We really need to look to upgrade Hamonic, at some point this season
We should be careful what we wish for, IMO if Hamonic gets pushed down a pairing he could end up replacing Brannstrom if they decide to have a shutdown tandem on the 3rd pairing rather than a defensive defenceman & a PMD.I think Hamonic has been fine, but if they're looking to make major noise in the playoffs, I could still see an upgrade to push him down to 3rd pairing come in.
I'll take that bet, I would play Brassard over Boyd any day, he just has more chemistry with Giroux & DeBrincat than people realize, he fits that line well & he fits that line better than Stutzle did.I'd bet a lot of money that Dorion is looking to upgrade that depth with this news. Will it happen? No guarantee. Externally, he'll say they're happy with their depth. Internally, it's probably a priority to bring someone in now. May not be a big name like Toews. But could be someone like Travis Boyd.
Absolutely. And a bridge would probably have been around 6-6.5 per anyway so not a lot of savings were available imo.100 percent. All the bridge would have done was escorted him to UFA status, where he likely gets even more under an increased cap.
He’s doing it in the A so he’s pretty close. Sliding him into the 3C and moving Pinto to 2C could be an easy solve for the coach
I'll take that bet, I would play Brassard over Boyd any day, he just has more chemistry with Giroux & DeBrincat than people realize, he fits that line well & he fits that line better than Stutzle did.
he's played 1 game this year. So lets see how he looks first.