Player Discussion Josh Norris (C) 6’-1” - Part 3

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,993
7,934
Having Pinto back creates depth. Put Norris at 3rd center if you want Pinto on the secind line.


I think the fact that Pinto takes the harder matchup is a key to our success, it’s like the opposition gets weaker in the top 6 because of Pinto’s defensive play and our team gets stronger in the top 6 because Norris gets an easier matchup especially in offensive zone face offs.

Expect big things from Norris now that Pinto is back, the ice will open up a bit for that entire line
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicboi64

Dionysus

Registered User
Oct 7, 2007
5,981
3,487
Around the bend
I want to see Batherson back with them.

Stu with G and Greig could be good

I've been liking Stu and Bath together. Two most talented forwards, who can think the game at a high level. Play well off the rush and cycle. G complements them well with his smarts, and faceoff ability.

Norris and Chucky with Grieg have good sandpaper and straight line games.
 

OD99

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
5,225
4,432
I've been liking Stu and Bath together. Two most talented forwards, who can think the game at a high level. Play well off the rush and cycle. G complements them well with his smarts, and faceoff ability.

Norris and Chucky with Grieg have good sandpaper and straight line games.
Yes, I don't mind either line.

I am curious if the Tkachuk Norris Bath line can find their previous chemistry and give us a truly dominant line.

The Stu line would be a pain in the ass and competent offensively.

Just spitballing.
 

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
44,469
17,477
I've been liking Stu and Bath together. Two most talented forwards, who can think the game at a high level. Play well off the rush and cycle. G complements them well with his smarts, and faceoff ability.

Norris and Chucky with Grieg have good sandpaper and straight line games.
Both lines have been playing well. Just sever lack of finish.

I would tinker with the lines. Unless we can get a serious replacement for Greig
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,112
34,863
Both lines have been playing well. Just sever lack of finish.

I would tinker with the lines. Unless we can get a serious replacement for Greig
For a team with a severe lack of finish, we're still 13th league wide in goals per game...

All kidding aside, scoring has really dropped off in Nov, we were 3rd at the end of October, PP has really cooled off and needs to be better, and 5v5 hasn't faired much better. Ups and downs will happen, the underlying numbers for scoring are actually better in Nov,

5v5 (NST)xGF/60xGA/60xGF%SCF/60SCA/60SCF%HDCF/60HDCA/60HDCF%SH%SV%PDO
Nov
2.6
1.71​
60.33​
30.15
23.18​
56.53​
10.05
6.65​
60.19​
5.53
89.71​
0.952​
Oct
2.37​
2.46​
49.05​
24.57​
28.02​
46.72​
8.14​
10.77​
43.07​
8.81​
89.6​
0.984​
 

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
44,469
17,477
For a team with a severe lack of finish, we're still 13th league wide in goals per game...

All kidding aside, scoring has really dropped off in Nov, we were 3rd at the end of October, PP has really cooled off and needs to be better, and 5v5 hasn't faired much better. Ups and downs will happen, the underlying numbers for scoring are actually better in Nov,

5v5 (NST)xGF/60xGA/60xGF%SCF/60SCA/60SCF%HDCF/60HDCA/60HDCF%SH%SV%PDO
Nov
2.6
1.71​
60.33​
30.15
23.18​
56.53​
10.05
6.65​
60.19​
5.53
89.71​
0.952​
Oct
2.37​
2.46​
49.05​
24.57​
28.02​
46.72​
8.14​
10.77​
43.07​
8.81​
89.6​
0.984​
The team play has been great. No arguments there.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,112
34,863
The team play has been great. No arguments there.
That sh% number really stands out.

Lets assume we've overhyped the talent level on the team, even if that's true, a sh% of 5.53 in Nov is third worst in the league. I doubt very much that will continue. of note, Toronto is 2nd worst at 5.23%, so teams with talent can have their struggles too.

We should probably be around 8%, +/- 1%. That's about another 5 goals (5v5) over the 8 games we played in Nov if we're just shooting at an expected sh%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xspyrit and PlayOn

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
44,469
17,477
That sh% number really stands out.

Lets assume we've overhyped the talent level on the team, even if that's true, a sh% of 5.53 in Nov is third worst in the league. I doubt very much that will continue. of note, Toronto is 2nd worst at 5.23%, so teams with talent can have their struggles too.

We should probably be around 8%, +/- 1%. That's about another 5 goals (5v5) over the 8 games we played in Nov if we're just shooting at an expected sh%.
Expected. Expected why. Cuz that’s league average?

I don’t even feel like we’ve been hitting posts lately. Our guys simply cannot beat goalies regularly.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,112
34,863
Expected. Expected why. Cuz that’s league average?

I don’t even feel like we’ve been hitting posts lately. Our guys simply cannot beat goalies regularly.
It's actually a bit below average (8.76). Last year, with mostly the same players (at least the same core guys) we were at 8.36%. The year before that we were 7.49 and before that 7.58

Expected because 5.53 is extremely low. Expected because we are getting the quality looks, this isn't a case of a team shooting from the perimeter.
 

OD99

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
5,225
4,432
Expected. Expected why. Cuz that’s league average?

I don’t even feel like we’ve been hitting posts lately. Our guys simply cannot beat goalies regularly.
Most of our top 6 has a history of scoring goals. Sometimes the team can be in a slump.

We could also be putting more pucks on net from less desirable areas. At the end of the day, we aren't scoring enough, consistently, and personally, I think we need more rebound goals.

We don't get enough 2nd and 3rd whacks at pucks right now.
 

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
44,469
17,477
Most of our top 6 has a history of scoring goals. Sometimes the team can be in a slump.

We could also be putting more pucks on net from less desirable areas. At the end of the day, we aren't scoring enough, consistently, and personally, I think we need more rebound goals.

We don't get enough 2nd and 3rd whacks at pucks right now.
We are creating scoring chances. Not a ridiculous rate. But.

Tkatchuk has a very particular skill set.

Norris is a quick one timer guy.

We don’t have a pure goalscorer on this team and our depth has a history of not scoring AT ALL outside of pinto who is playing with no offensive talent
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xspyrit

OD99

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
5,225
4,432
They certainly don't look like they can score right now.

What a pathetic effort.
 

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,993
7,934
I like Norris and I like his maturity.

But as of today, Brian Mcgratton has done more for this franchise then Josh Norris has.

Mcgratton played 130 games from Ottawa , Norris has played 200 almost all on the top PP unit.

And Brain Mcgratton has still done more for this franchise, that’s how little impact this team makes.
 

sena

Registered User
Jul 3, 2024
138
87
We are creating scoring chances. Not a ridiculous rate. But.

Tkatchuk has a very particular skill set.

Norris is a quick one timer guy.

We don’t have a pure goalscorer on this team and our depth has a history of not scoring AT ALL outside of pinto who is playing with no offensive talent
They need a setup guy and are one top six short of a full team
 

Relapsing

Registered User
Jul 3, 2018
2,689
2,538
Argh! Norris, he did something bad tonight, really bone headed move to throw the puck up the middle for a turnover. I'm so dang angry about it I could just... Well... Clench my fists I tell ya. Ball them right up and shake em a little. So. Mad. At. Him.

Please just go with it, some folks in the Brady thread are really putting the screws to me about not pointing out Norris' bad play in a thread that isn't about him
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DylanSensFan

mysens

Registered User
Apr 9, 2013
1,083
958
I have to credit him tonight for playing with a bit of an edge, more so than usual. I just am not sure why he cannot set up for his one-timers. He seems to always not be in his opportune shooting lane.
 

Relapsing

Registered User
Jul 3, 2018
2,689
2,538
I have to credit him tonight for playing with a bit of an edge, more so than usual. I just am not sure why he cannot set up for his one-timers. He seems to always not be in his opportune shooting lane.
I wonder how many game minutes has passed since his last one timer? Maybe it's a case of forgetting how to set up for it, or maybe he lost some mobility that's affecting a big wind up so he's not trying?

Wait, no, those are excuses! Sorry, I'm supposed to be critical, shit. Maybe it's because he's an idiot.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
57,112
34,863
I wonder how many game minutes has passed since his last one timer? Maybe it's a case of forgetting how to set up for it, or maybe he lost some mobility that's affecting a big wind up so he's not trying?

Wait, no, those are excuses! Sorry, I'm supposed to be critical, shit. Maybe it's because he's an idiot.
He had a one time attempt last night, it was just off the mark (heeled it into the corner if I recall)
 

Relapsing

Registered User
Jul 3, 2018
2,689
2,538
He had a one time attempt last night, it was just off the mark (heeled it into the corner if I recall)
I noticed that too. Man I miss him being lethal from there.

I don't know how he's gonna get his mojo back, but it sure would be nice to have him return to being a consistent scoring threat from his office
 
  • Like
Reactions: Micklebot

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad