Player Discussion Josh Norris (C) 6’-1” - Part 3

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,876
7,840
Having Pinto back creates depth. Put Norris at 3rd center if you want Pinto on the secind line.


I think the fact that Pinto takes the harder matchup is a key to our success, it’s like the opposition gets weaker in the top 6 because of Pinto’s defensive play and our team gets stronger in the top 6 because Norris gets an easier matchup especially in offensive zone face offs.

Expect big things from Norris now that Pinto is back, the ice will open up a bit for that entire line
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicboi64

Dionysus

Registered User
Oct 7, 2007
5,889
3,416
Around the bend
I want to see Batherson back with them.

Stu with G and Greig could be good

I've been liking Stu and Bath together. Two most talented forwards, who can think the game at a high level. Play well off the rush and cycle. G complements them well with his smarts, and faceoff ability.

Norris and Chucky with Grieg have good sandpaper and straight line games.
 

OD99

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
5,198
4,415
I've been liking Stu and Bath together. Two most talented forwards, who can think the game at a high level. Play well off the rush and cycle. G complements them well with his smarts, and faceoff ability.

Norris and Chucky with Grieg have good sandpaper and straight line games.
Yes, I don't mind either line.

I am curious if the Tkachuk Norris Bath line can find their previous chemistry and give us a truly dominant line.

The Stu line would be a pain in the ass and competent offensively.

Just spitballing.
 

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
44,342
17,379
I've been liking Stu and Bath together. Two most talented forwards, who can think the game at a high level. Play well off the rush and cycle. G complements them well with his smarts, and faceoff ability.

Norris and Chucky with Grieg have good sandpaper and straight line games.
Both lines have been playing well. Just sever lack of finish.

I would tinker with the lines. Unless we can get a serious replacement for Greig
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
56,842
34,639
Both lines have been playing well. Just sever lack of finish.

I would tinker with the lines. Unless we can get a serious replacement for Greig
For a team with a severe lack of finish, we're still 13th league wide in goals per game...

All kidding aside, scoring has really dropped off in Nov, we were 3rd at the end of October, PP has really cooled off and needs to be better, and 5v5 hasn't faired much better. Ups and downs will happen, the underlying numbers for scoring are actually better in Nov,

5v5 (NST)xGF/60xGA/60xGF%SCF/60SCA/60SCF%HDCF/60HDCA/60HDCF%SH%SV%PDO
Nov
2.6
1.71​
60.33​
30.15
23.18​
56.53​
10.05
6.65​
60.19​
5.53
89.71​
0.952​
Oct
2.37​
2.46​
49.05​
24.57​
28.02​
46.72​
8.14​
10.77​
43.07​
8.81​
89.6​
0.984​
 

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
44,342
17,379
For a team with a severe lack of finish, we're still 13th league wide in goals per game...

All kidding aside, scoring has really dropped off in Nov, we were 3rd at the end of October, PP has really cooled off and needs to be better, and 5v5 hasn't faired much better. Ups and downs will happen, the underlying numbers for scoring are actually better in Nov,

5v5 (NST)xGF/60xGA/60xGF%SCF/60SCA/60SCF%HDCF/60HDCA/60HDCF%SH%SV%PDO
Nov
2.6
1.71​
60.33​
30.15
23.18​
56.53​
10.05
6.65​
60.19​
5.53
89.71​
0.952​
Oct
2.37​
2.46​
49.05​
24.57​
28.02​
46.72​
8.14​
10.77​
43.07​
8.81​
89.6​
0.984​
The team play has been great. No arguments there.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
56,842
34,639
The team play has been great. No arguments there.
That sh% number really stands out.

Lets assume we've overhyped the talent level on the team, even if that's true, a sh% of 5.53 in Nov is third worst in the league. I doubt very much that will continue. of note, Toronto is 2nd worst at 5.23%, so teams with talent can have their struggles too.

We should probably be around 8%, +/- 1%. That's about another 5 goals (5v5) over the 8 games we played in Nov if we're just shooting at an expected sh%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xspyrit and PlayOn

Burrowsaurus

Registered User
Mar 20, 2013
44,342
17,379
That sh% number really stands out.

Lets assume we've overhyped the talent level on the team, even if that's true, a sh% of 5.53 in Nov is third worst in the league. I doubt very much that will continue. of note, Toronto is 2nd worst at 5.23%, so teams with talent can have their struggles too.

We should probably be around 8%, +/- 1%. That's about another 5 goals (5v5) over the 8 games we played in Nov if we're just shooting at an expected sh%.
Expected. Expected why. Cuz that’s league average?

I don’t even feel like we’ve been hitting posts lately. Our guys simply cannot beat goalies regularly.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
56,842
34,639
Expected. Expected why. Cuz that’s league average?

I don’t even feel like we’ve been hitting posts lately. Our guys simply cannot beat goalies regularly.
It's actually a bit below average (8.76). Last year, with mostly the same players (at least the same core guys) we were at 8.36%. The year before that we were 7.49 and before that 7.58

Expected because 5.53 is extremely low. Expected because we are getting the quality looks, this isn't a case of a team shooting from the perimeter.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad