OD99
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2012
- 5,225
- 4,432
I disagree in the short term. Overall, yea I think (know) Pinto is more valuable but to lose Brannstom now would leave a big hole in the bottom pair.Pinto is absolutely more valuable than Brannstrom. Norris clearly cant be relied upon. Center ice is way more important than a bottom pair D man. The only player they can get rid of is Joseph here unfortunately. 2 goals for Paul BTW
IF Norris is back in a week or so, I think we can handle having Greig as 3C without losing much of anything. I am a believer in Greig obviously but the drop (if any) from Greig to Pinto is far less than the drop from Branny to whoever would replace him.
In the end I think it would be short sighted to lose Brannstrom to fit in Pinto now.