It is really astounding how people think about good vs bad management.
We have a good core because we got incredibly lucky with top picks and, to management's credit, they managed to lock up the core. Management gets full mark and it is 100% deserved.
However everything else has been mediocre-to-poor with a lot of wasted assets and (for now) a mismanaged salary structure which has us in cap trouble.
Bad management is when you have no margin for error or room to maneuvre. Bad management is when you can't sign an important RFA who doesn't have arbitration rights.
Dorion doesn't suck because he hasn't made any good moves. He sucks because he makes way, way more bad moves. Quality matters more than quantity, but at some point you cross a threshold where that isn't true and the amount of bad quantity does hinder the good quality's ability to have a larger impact on the outcome.
Good luck explaining that to some, I have tried for years.
1) Yes we have Stutzle, Norris, Sogaard and Ostapchuk but we traded a 3 times Norris winner to get it and depended on :
- The Sharks falling apart faster than expected
- The Rangers and Kings to not draft Stutzle
- Required to move up using a 2nd and 3rd round pick to draft Sogaard
- Norris being better than the Sens themselves expected
2) Yes we have Tkachuk and thankfully they didn't draft Zadina over him but it also required the Habs to stupidly draft Kotkaniemi
4) Yes we have Batherson and he was one of our best draft picks in recent history but he was actually drafted BEFORE the rebuild. We can credit Dorion sure but the guy at the head of the Sens drafting, Trent Mann, was brought in by Bryan Murray in 2011
5) Yes we have Giroux but he is 35 y/o and we haven't made the playoffs yet. It required him to be tied with the Ottawa area
6) Yes we have Pinto but he is not even signed right now... It was a great pick though so full credit to them
7) Yes we have Greig but we traded a high end 3rd line Center to get him (Pageau). We also drafted Kleven with the return from that trade. Thanks to shrewd drafting here, this could end up the 2nd best trade in Dorion's era
8) We also have Jarventie who looks promising but after a FULL 6 years rebuild, is that all we have left in terms of promising forwards? As we haven't made the playoffs yet, we should still have a pretty good prospect pool like the Devils or Sabres for example.
9) Yes we have Chabot but Murray was still the GM when he was drafted
10) Yes we have Chychrun but we paid 12th OA and two 2nds to get him. This is one of Dorion's best moves though, he just needs to stay healthy and extend with us to a reasonable contract
11) Yes we have Sanderson and this is one of the best Sens picks. Not a big reach but it took balls to take him 5th OA so full credit to them
12) Yes we have Zub, this was another of Dorion's best moves
13) Yes we have Brannstrom but we had to trade a 26 y/o Selke level PPG Winger to get him
14) Forsberg and Korpsilo, I like that duo, there's potential there. Great picks up by Dorion
Our whole rebuild is built on :
- Karlsson and Pageau trades (great returns, great drafting for what was elite/great pieces)
- Tkachuk and Sanderson selections (didn't screw up with 4th and 5th OA picks)
- Good drafting in Batherson and Pinto
- Getting Giroux, Zub, Forsberg and Korpisalo for basically nothing (UFAs + waiver claim)
Now if you look at Zibanejad, Duchene, Gustavsson, Boucher, Stepan and all the other stuff, that's where it gets ugly