JanBulisPiggyBack
Registered User
- Dec 31, 2011
- 3,858
- 2,749
That’san expensive packageI only wanted to trade him in a package for a quality win-now player (like our 1st + Lekkerimaki for Chychrun).
It didn’t have to be our 1st this season (or could have been NYI’s 1st rather than making the Hronek deal). Chychrun in over OEL (or Soucy) is a huge upgrade.That’san expensive package
That’s still really expensiveIt didn’t have to be our 1st this season. Chychrun in over OEL (or Soucy) is a huge upgrade.
Chychrun is arguably a top pairing defenceman signed for two more years at $4.6 mill. This package would be the same as Hronek, except Lekkerimaki over our 2nd round pick.That’s still really expensive
If Lekkerimaki tracks well this year then his value will be more than a 1st rounderChychrun is arguably a top pairing defenceman signed for two more years at $4.6 mill. This package would be the same as Hronek, except Lekkerimaki over our 2nd round pick.
Yes there were many prominent posters who stated vociferously that he 'had the worth of a 3rd rounder' and that we should deal him before his value tanked further, that he was a terrible pick, that him struggling this past season (with a concussion, a foot injury, and mono) was a far greater indicator of his true value and upside as a player than his incredibly precocious performance in the SHL the previous season etc.
Those same people will now 'misremember' themselves as simply being 'cautious' or 'not sure if he was as good as hoped'.
And so it goes...
And for the record, for those like Grub above me who say, 'yeah I was overly pessimistic and it looks like I was wrong, I learned from this', no shade at all. Admitting to, learning from, and growing from our mistakes takes a lot of humility and self-awareness.
I've never held a particularly positive view of Lekkerimaki, and wasn't thrilled when he was selected. When he began to struggle, it brought back memories of Juolevi, Virtanen, Rodin, and numerous other promising (?) prospects who couldn't fulfill their potential due to injuries. I believe my concerns were justified, and if we were to redo the draft before the last post-season, I don't think he would have been selected in the first two rounds. From that perspective, a third-round pick seemed like a fair value for him back then.Yes there were many prominent posters who stated vociferously that he 'had the worth of a 3rd rounder' and that we should deal him before his value tanked further, that he was a terrible pick, that him struggling this past season (with a concussion, a foot injury, and mono) was a far greater indicator of his true value and upside as a player than his incredibly precocious performance in the SHL the previous season etc.
Those same people will now 'misremember' themselves as simply being 'cautious' or 'not sure if he was as good as hoped'.
And so it goes...
And for the record, for those like Grub above me who say, 'yeah I was overly pessimistic and it looks like I was wrong, I learned from this', no shade at all. Admitting to, learning from, and growing from our mistakes takes a lot of humility and self-awareness.
Yes there were many prominent posters who stated vociferously that he 'had the worth of a 3rd rounder' and that we should deal him before his value tanked further, that he was a terrible pick, that him struggling this past season (with a concussion, a foot injury, and mono) was a far greater indicator of his true value and upside as a player than his incredibly precocious performance in the SHL the previous season etc.
Agreed. On the other side of the coin many of us have been wrong over hyping prospects. Although I’m still holding out hope that Cole Cassels returns as the McDavid whisperer. Lol.Yes there were many prominent posters who stated vociferously that he 'had the worth of a 3rd rounder' and that we should deal him before his value tanked further, that he was a terrible pick, that him struggling this past season (with a concussion, a foot injury, and mono) was a far greater indicator of his true value and upside as a player than his incredibly precocious performance in the SHL the previous season etc.
Those same people will now 'misremember' themselves as simply being 'cautious' or 'not sure if he was as good as hoped'.
And so it goes...
And for the record, for those like Grub above me who say, 'yeah I was overly pessimistic and it looks like I was wrong, I learned from this', no shade at all. Admitting to, learning from, and growing from our mistakes takes a lot of humility and self-awareness.
Yes there were many prominent posters who stated vociferously that he 'had the worth of a 3rd rounder' and that we should deal him before his value tanked further, that he was a terrible pick, that him struggling this past season (with a concussion, a foot injury, and mono) was a far greater indicator of his true value and upside as a player than his incredibly precocious performance in the SHL the previous season etc.
Those same people will now 'misremember' themselves as simply being 'cautious' or 'not sure if he was as good as hoped'.
And so it goes...
And for the record, for those like Grub above me who say, 'yeah I was overly pessimistic and it looks like I was wrong, I learned from this', no shade at all. Admitting to, learning from, and growing from our mistakes takes a lot of humility and self-awareness.
Only on this forum would we have great news (prospect having a rebound year) that is immediately followed by “I told you so” condescending comments. Just shut up and enjoy having nice things, Jesus
I seem to remember MS saying he would be a 3rd round pick in the 2023 draft..... Which was completely wrong even at the time you said thatIt's so annoying.
It's also largely strawman stuff as there was maybe 1 dumb guy here calling him a bust.
He had a terrible year last year. He was poor in both WJCs, didn't score in a league he was expected to, and added 'concussion issues' to his plate on top of that. It was concerning and there was reason for concern and his stock/value absolutely dropped considerably.
Nothing that was said about him was really wrong.
Anyway, it's great that he's scoring. But it also doesn't mean that he's now a surefire NHLer, either.
I seem to remember MS saying he would be a 3rd round pick in the 2023 draft..... Which was completely wrong even at the time you said that
Don't just make stuff up. He was good in the WJCs. It was a classic case of him being the second youngest forward on the team and starting lower in the lineup, but he earned more ice-time as the tournament went on and was among team leaders in points/60 and xG/60. He was probably Sweden's third best forward behind Carlsson and Bystedt, both of whom are much more physically mature than he. The biggest factor for me was how good he was despite not looking like he had the energy to engage physically or keep up with the intensity of the game. In hindsight, his conditioning just wasn't in mid-season form as it should have been, but he had a good excuse.It's so annoying.
It's also largely strawman stuff as there was maybe 1 dumb guy here calling him a bust.
He had a terrible year last year. He was poor in both WJCs, didn't score in a league he was expected to, and added 'concussion issues' to his plate on top of that. It was concerning and there was reason for concern and his stock/value absolutely dropped considerably.
Nothing that was said about him was really wrong.
Anyway, it's great that he's scoring. But it also doesn't mean that he's now a surefire NHLer, either.
Yes, but then we would be in even worse cap trouble, and probably have to throw in another draft pick to unload some salary.It didn’t have to be our 1st this season (or could have been NYI’s 1st rather than making the Hronek deal). Chychrun in over OEL (or Soucy) is a huge upgrade.
Don't just make stuff up. He was good in the WJCs. It was a classic case of him being the second youngest forward on the team and starting lower in the lineup, but he earned more ice-time as the tournament went on and was among team leaders in points/60 and xG/60. He was probably Sweden's third best forward behind Carlsson and Bystedt, both of whom are much more physically mature than he. The biggest factor for me was how good he was despite not looking like he had the energy to engage physically or keep up with the intensity of the game. In hindsight, his conditioning just wasn't in mid-season form as it should have been, but he had a good excuse.
He also categorically wasn't terrible last year. He was mediocre and didn't score as expected in the regular season, but his playoffs were truly exceptional, and backed up by excellent all round play besides setting that playoff points record for his age. His play in the playoffs all but confirms the notion that injury and illness were major factors in his game early in the season.
He was also very good in the SHL preseason for what that's worth.
The only thing you are right about is that these first two games don't mean much. He has played a little more at the perimeter on 5v5 than what I saw both in the playoffs last year and in the preseason. PP goals are great, but I would like to see some ES production before we label his start to the season a success.
Yes there were many prominent posters who stated vociferously that he 'had the worth of a 3rd rounder' and that we should deal him before his value tanked further, that he was a terrible pick, that him struggling this past season (with a concussion, a foot injury, and mono) was a far greater indicator of his true value and upside as a player than his incredibly precocious performance in the SHL the previous season etc.
Those same people will now 'misremember' themselves as simply being 'cautious' or 'not sure if he was as good as hoped'.
And so it goes...
And for the record, for those like Grub above me who say, 'yeah I was overly pessimistic and it looks like I was wrong, I learned from this', no shade at all. Admitting to, learning from, and growing from our mistakes takes a lot of humility and self-awareness.
I'm not specifically calling out MS.Engages in historical revisionism to accuse others of historical revisionism.
Epic post.
Look, if you're going to publicly credit Grub, you should at least have the integrity to admit you're trying to, badly, call out MS.