Tkachuk Norris
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2012
- 16,019
- 7,417
You want to find the most clueless posters on HF? Read a Gaudreau thread.
You want to find the most clueless posters on HF? Read a Gaudreau thread.
Right now? He's got 15 points in his last 12 games since being liberated from Monahan.
And outside of a 10 game stretch right after the hiring of Sutter (when he was asked to play dump and chase hockey with Monahan and Ritchie) he's been a point per game player this year. He also finished last season at a point per game over the last 28 games
Its crazy how good every NHL player is when you ignore all the bad games they play.Beside all of his bad games he's had good games
Its crazy how good every NHL player is when you ignore all the bad games they play.
Except Franz Nielsen, he doesnt have good games.
And many of you said he will be a perennial 100+ pt player and Art Ross winner. Fun fact: 60pts is closer to the 40 I predicted than the 100+ you guys did...you’re the guy that said he was Gerbe as a ceiling. You literally posted over 500 times about how Gaudreau would suck and never do anything in the NHL.
487 points in 517 games later you still make yourself look like the least knowledgeable poster on HF. Congrats.
This issue with Gaudreau is that he should make a line better but is being tasked with carrying a line. I see him as a better version of Tatar. I think Gaudreau is more than capable of being a 90pt player again but unless he's playing with someone like prime Gio or McDavid or someone else who's capable of carrying a line on their own, I think this year and last was the real Gaudreau.
I see Gaudreau as a guy that's easy to shutdown too which doesn't bode well for him.
And many of you said he will be a perennial 100+ pt player and Art Ross winner. Fun fact: 60pts is closer to the 40 I predicted than the 100+ you guys did...
I know it must suck to never see your team accomplish anything, but dont take that anger out on everyone else.
What makes him especially easy to shutdown is that he plays with Monahan. I think Gaudreau would be dynamite again if he wasn't the only catalyst on his line.
Yet you keep acting like most of you didnt call him a future multiple 100+ pt player/Art Ross winner.my team may suck but at least I’m not clueless enough to think Johnny’s ceiling is Nathan Gerbe. And I’m certainly not so bored with my life that I am going to convince any random internet dude that will listen to a fact that I am completely wrong about. And I’m certainly not so self-absorbed that when I am clearly out to lunch with a take that I continue to make up ridiculous responses 7 years later instead of admitting I was wrong and move on with my life.
To each their own I guess
Yet you keep acting like most of you didnt call him a future multiple 100+ pt player/Art Ross winner.
Best of luck
His agent is going to use the most favorable possible argument possible. If he sucked 3 years ago he would just ignore it. Most projection models are built around waiting the previous 3 seasons with regression like (5x-3x-1x)/9 built in.Essentially useless huh. So I imagine his agent won't bring up his two top 10 scoring finishes, his Calder nomination, or finishing 4th in Hart trophy voting just two seasons ago in his contract negotiations. Or that he's 10th in even strength scoring since entering the league. Those facts apparently have absolutely no bearing on his value.
Sure the most recent seasons are the most relevant, doesn't mean at all the rest of a player's body of work is completely discounted. Especially when it comes to one of the league's premier point producers.
I must have missed when the last two seasons the top 10 were 60pt players...the guy is literally a top ten scorer in the league. The only guys who have scored more have played with better players.
but you’re right. He’s closer to being Nathan Gerbe than an elite forward. You must never get tired of being wrong
yeah we've all read your posts.You want to find the most clueless posters on HF? Read a Gaudreau thread.