Senor Catface
Registered User
- Jul 25, 2006
- 16,686
- 22,073
Stfuthe lynch mob forming on he main board is a joke. It was 1 hour after sunset on a non main road. This story is far from over
Stfuthe lynch mob forming on he main board is a joke. It was 1 hour after sunset on a non main road. This story is far from over
Is it far from over though? He hit and killed two people and then admitted he was drunk driving. (Which he has a history of) Seems pretty black and white to me.
Sure he deserves a fair trial but he definitely doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt.
Maybe. Im not saying he might not get off on a technicality. I’m saying he deserves to get blasted regardless of how the case goes.If the drunk had a dash cam this could very well go a completely opposite direction
Based on this logic, any groups that are trying to reduce DUI incidents (MADD, AA) should just give up. If it’s all on the driver, what’s the point?
I guess you missed the part where I said it’s primarily the drivers fault multiple times lol. Either 0% or 100% with some of you
Bad actors will always exist. I don’t believe that you should just put your hands up and accept that you can’t do anything to mitigate their actions
Soundwave, I know you to be a reasonable poster on these pages. Tell me you realize that driving under the influence includes consuming other products than just alcohol, right?
I’d encourage you to provide some confirmed data that supports this type of assertion that it’s “older people” who are causing DUI crashes. It’s a pretty big swing to make this claim.
i think cars ARE an issue. But in a more broad sense; not specifically tied to this one issue but DUIs in general. I just thought it was relevant enough to bring up.You started this whole thing by saying cars were an issue.
Human beings are far from perfect creatures. People will make stupid, selfish and irresponsible decisions no matter what safeguards society has in place.
In this specific case I’m not sure what “society” could have done to prevent drunken dickhead from getting behind the wheel and passing a car on the right on a narrow road at night.
Your striving for perfection in an imperfect world.
I’m tired of people blaming society for individuals stupid actions. Society has zero bearing in this. This is 110% on the driver.
i think cars ARE an issue. But in a more broad sense; not specifically tied to this one issue but DUIs in general. I just thought it was relevant enough to bring up.
I don’t think society is perfect - there’s always room for improvement. Will things like this happen anyway? Probably. But I think it’s our responsibility to try and minimize these types of accidents as much as possible.
Suspect car dealerships exist. Or informal ones, or informal sales of such etc. People can get anything they want black market and easy, and they can get a vehicle to drive. Again nothing really seems to deter drunk drivers. Some will continue to drive without a license, without insurance etc.I don't think you can leave a car dealership with a new vehicle unless you show them registration and have a plate for the vehicle, and you can't get those without going to a registry who wouldn't issue these to a person on a suspended license, so I'm not sure this isn't essentially already in place with the current process.
If all cars are self driving they wouldn’t even need to rely as much on cameras to avoid accidents. All vehicles would be networked, traffic would flow seamlessly, accidents would be probably very rare. Like it would be a real system at a certain point, not a bunch of individuals scrambling around.Soon we may have auto piloted cars, which I don't know if they are a good idea at this point. Autopilot would presumably stay behind the other car.
Musks cars would theoretically have enough cameras to override a dumb driver move like this perhaps. But I wouldn't want to put all trust in full auto pilot.
It’s kinda the same thing as gun laws, criminals find their ways while law abiding citizens are the ones that suffer.Suspect car dealerships exist. Or informal ones, or informal sales of such etc. People can get anything they want black market and easy, and they can get a vehicle to drive. Again nothing really seems to deter drunk drivers. Some will continue to drive without a license, without insurance etc.
Lets not forget how strong buddy network is. Its crazy that people will take liability for others but it happens. Some people will even buy a car for somebody else with their insurance and registration. Crazy I know.
I had an episode with a drunk driver that totalled our vehicle and injured myself and my wife. He didn't have his own insurance, wasn't his own vehicle, and he was being allowed to drive a company vehicle despite several DUI's having even been incarcerated for same. Of course the company that was allowing this guy a vehicle to drive got eviscerated. Of course he was hammered out of his head on a Friday night having spent several hours pounding them back. The guy is so hammered he can't even talk properly. I had to several times tell the police to write him up for dui. Was ridiculous I even had to get them to do this. The same police were trying to get us both to give information in the backseat of the same police car. All I wanted to do was assault the guy. Imagine them expecting us to share details in presence of the other. Anyway.
If all cars are self driving they wouldn’t even need to rely as much on cameras to avoid accidents. All vehicles would be networked, traffic would flow seamlessly, accidents would be probably very rare. Like it would be a real system at a certain point, not a bunch of individuals scrambling around.
It’s already a thing. It’s called Waymo.You would need cameras for pedestrian traffic, animals jumping out on the road way, etc. etc. etc.
Stop bringing hockey into this when someone dies. No I didn't want him on the oilers. Way too soft and disappeared in playoffs. The only thing that should be brought up is how tragic and senseless this was. 2 bothers killed and taken away from a loving family. This had zero to do with kissing ass after someone dies and talking about how great he was.He wasn't great and we didn't want him on our team. He was a good person by all accounts and a huge family man. I feel bad for his family and close friends. Such a tragic senseless accident
Nope. Didn't like him as a player and not a playoff guy. But this is not about hockey. This is about 2 brothers losing their life because of a drunk driverI think any team would love to have a 4th round pick hit pay dirt like that. That's the hockey management equivalent of winning a lottery ticket. He was an immense talent, I can admit that. Can you imagine a line with him Leon and Connor on it like they would have at the All-Star game? They'd probably have shifts where opponents wouldn't even be able to touch the puck for the entire shift.
Nope. Didn't like him as a player and not a playoff guy. But this is not about hockey. This is about 2 brothers losing their life because of a drunk driver
Like I said this is about human life, not hockey. And Kent Neilson was more talented. He was a good person and huge family man but not my cup of tea as a playerIf he's your no.1 guy, that can be a rough go in the playoffs, it's a contact sport and being 5'6 as the go to player does become a bit problematic, but damn if I didn't hold my breath every time he had any puck possession in our zone in any game.
I feared him much more than Tkachuk or Lindholm or any of their other guys.
He's not a McDavid level talent, but almost no one is, I'd submit he's probably the most purely skilled player the Flames have ever he's
kill 2 people on a bicycle? Doesnt need to be going very fast.The messed up thing is how fast would this guy have had to be going to kill 2 people from a rear impact? Either he was flooring it or he tried to stop at the last second right before impact which make have been even worse.