- Sep 27, 2017
- 3,768
- 3,004
Well, as tragic as the story is and how bad I feel for their families, this infograph is absurd.It’s been widely reported he passed on the right.
Read the report.
View attachment 904246
View attachment 904247
Exactly this. It's terrible but true.Its not a pass on the right if your returning to your lane of travel
A normal, sober person isn't driving fast enough and so close behind the car in front of them, on a single-lane backroad no less, that two bike riders on the road just magically appear in front of them so quickly the driver can't get out of the way. Some of you need to be reminded that speeding and tailgating and driving aggressively isn't what normal people do, precisely for these reasons. Most of us aren't children and understand there are consequences to driving like a garbage person. People who deal with car accidents (cops, lawyers, doctors and nurses, etc) see this shit way too f***ing often.Well, as tragic as the story is and how bad I feel for their families, this infograph is absurd.
Nobody is moving all the way into the opposite lane to avoid bikers who are biking conveniently just inside the non-existent shoulder.
The driver was zipped up, probably on suicide watch, and I'm sure his sigh was one of having to wait with his thoughts another few days locked up before he will have a chance to end his own life. Guilt ridden. There's no way he is going to be around much longer.
Point being, he probably deserves it for drinking and driving and ultimately taking the lives of two young men. However, if you look at this infograph and think the boundaries and measurements are anywhere near correct, you're being foolish.
In all likelihood, as the front vehicle moved towards the centre of the road, Higgins was simultaneously finished passing the middle car and was now moving back into the right lane. Again, go look at pictures of the road in question. There is no room for bikers to be tucked in on the shoulder. They would've been out in the road to some degree. Now when he cuts back into the right lane, he has no idea the bikers are there because the vehicle in front of him is blocking them from view. A sober person might realize the lead car is moving out of the way of something for sure.
Even driving solidly in his lane, he would have hit these boys. The idea that he was ripping onto (again) a non-existent shoulder makes no sense.
Terrible timing and circumstance coupled with a drunk driver leads to this tragedy. Now may not be the time to discuss the things @Jumptheshark is, but a lot went wrong here for this to occur. It wasn't a drunk driver blowing through a red light.
Exactly this. It's terrible but true.
but calling for the death penalty for the is okay?
Definitely agree, in a perfect world this never happens -- however almost all road rage / car crashes happen while people are completely sober.A normal, sober person isn't driving fast enough and so close behind the car in front of them, on a single-lane backroad no less, that two bike riders on the road just magically appear in front of them so quickly the driver can't get out of the way. Some of you need to be reminded that speeding and tailgating and driving aggressively isn't what normal people do, precisely for these reasons. Most of us aren't children and understand there are consequences to driving like a garbage person. People who deal with car accidents (cops, lawyers, doctors and nurses, etc) see this shit way too f***ing often.
There isn't a curb/shoulder on the particular road.I don't care if its bloody midnight and total darkness out there, this driver made a pass on the right side onto the curb/shoulder.
He could've been blinded by the sun or didn't see the cyclists, doesn't matter, that manoeuvre is illegal in any conditions. Drunk or not, day light or midnight.
With this, I totally agree. The way this guy was described as driving, he may not have needed alcohol. Of course, he was drinking. But aggression and inability to comprehend consequences like an adult is something horrible sober drivers deal with too, and cause tragedies like this all the time.Definitely agree, in a perfect world this never happens -- however almost all road rage / car crashes happen while people are completely sober.
The world isn't black and white. Drunk drivers should be punished harshly but saying they'd be alive if he was sober, I just don't agree with. Looking at the infograph, reading articles, piecing it together it seems like a combination of terrible factors culminating in a tragedy. Happens all the time unfortunately, across the world.
There isn't a curb/shoulder on the particular road.
The police mention it was raining as well as them driving along the fog line. It's a terrible culmination of factors.
Well, as tragic as the story is and how bad I feel for their families, this infograph is absurd.
Nobody is moving all the way into the opposite lane to avoid bikers who are biking conveniently just inside the non-existent shoulder.
The driver was zipped up, probably on suicide watch, and I'm sure his sigh was one of having to wait with his thoughts another few days locked up before he will have a chance to end his own life. Guilt ridden. There's no way he is going to be around much longer.
Point being, he probably deserves it for drinking and driving and ultimately taking the lives of two young men. However, if you look at this infograph and think the boundaries and measurements are anywhere near correct, you're being foolish.
In all likelihood, as the front vehicle moved towards the centre of the road, Higgins was simultaneously finished passing the middle car and was now moving back into the right lane. Again, go look at pictures of the road in question. There is no room for bikers to be tucked in on the shoulder. They would've been out in the road to some degree. Now when he cuts back into the right lane, he has no idea the bikers are there because the vehicle in front of him is blocking them from view. A sober person might realize the lead car is moving out of the way of something for sure.
Even driving solidly in his lane, he would have hit these boys. The idea that he was ripping onto (again) a non-existent shoulder makes no sense.
Terrible timing and circumstance coupled with a drunk driver leads to this tragedy. Now may not be the time to discuss the things @Jumptheshark is, but a lot went wrong here for this to occur. It wasn't a drunk driver blowing through a red light.
Exactly this. It's terrible but true.
If that picture you shared is of the location of the collision, it shows a solid dividing line.Definitely agree, in a perfect world this never happens -- however almost all road rage / car crashes happen while people are completely sober.
The world isn't black and white. Drunk drivers should be punished harshly but saying they'd be alive if he was sober, I just don't agree with. Looking at the infograph, reading articles, piecing it together it seems like a combination of terrible factors culminating in a tragedy. Happens all the time unfortunately, across the world.
There isn't a curb/shoulder on the particular road.
The police mention it was raining as well as them driving along the fog line. It's a terrible culmination of factors.
It seems more And more people just want to appear “edgy”. Unfortunately, more often than not they end up appearing something much less flatteringWe seem to be arguing for the sake of having an argument here, and I’m not sure why. 2 young family men are dead in a horrible and preventable accident. The driver was drunk which makes it even more tragic and wasteful. Of course fatalities still occur with sober drivers but I have no clue what people are arguing about or even why they feel the need to argue in this moment.
Its not a pass on the right if your returning to your lane of travel
Well, as tragic as the story is and how bad I feel for their families, this infograph is absurd.
Nobody is moving all the way into the opposite lane to avoid bikers who are biking conveniently just inside the non-existent shoulder.
The driver was zipped up, probably on suicide watch, and I'm sure his sigh was one of having to wait with his thoughts another few days locked up before he will have a chance to end his own life. Guilt ridden. There's no way he is going to be around much longer.
Point being, he probably deserves it for drinking and driving and ultimately taking the lives of two young men. However, if you look at this infograph and think the boundaries and measurements are anywhere near correct, you're being foolish.
In all likelihood, as the front vehicle moved towards the centre of the road, Higgins was simultaneously finished passing the middle car and was now moving back into the right lane. Again, go look at pictures of the road in question. There is no room for bikers to be tucked in on the shoulder. They would've been out in the road to some degree. Now when he cuts back into the right lane, he has no idea the bikers are there because the vehicle in front of him is blocking them from view. A sober person might realize the lead car is moving out of the way of something for sure.
Even driving solidly in his lane, he would have hit these boys. The idea that he was ripping onto (again) a non-existent shoulder makes no sense.
Terrible timing and circumstance coupled with a drunk driver leads to this tragedy. Now may not be the time to discuss the things @Jumptheshark is, but a lot went wrong here for this to occur. It wasn't a drunk driver blowing through a red light.
Exactly this. It's terrible but true.
Yep. Only a true POS would try to absolve a drunk driver“Yeah, sure he was drunk BUT FACTORS” is perhaps the most ignorant argument of all time.
Actually, you are wrong. That is exactly how I was taught to pass by cyclists and people walking with the flow of traffic (as opposed to facing). Maybe I’m in the minority but it’s not nobody as you state. I see others do the same.Well, as tragic as the story is and how bad I feel for their families, this infograph is absurd.
Nobody is moving all the way into the opposite lane to avoid bikers who are biking conveniently just inside the non-existent shoulder.
Just as clarity from reports "the field sobriety" test was used. Not sure why a breathalyzer wasn't utilized either at scene or station. Hopefully its just an error of omissions in initial police reporting. I sure hope they made him blow at some point.Passing on the right is illegal in most places.
Passing on the right at night is slam dunk criminally negligent.
Passing on the right at night while drunk and is slam dunk open and shut your going to jail buddy.
Passing on the right at night while drunk and killing 2 people is your f***ed pal. Even Matlock will be begging for a plea bargain.
If his lawyer had half a brain he’d make a plea deal of admitting guilt in exchange for a lighter sentence given the fact he admitted to the crime on the scene and blew over.
Um the driver is on anything but suicide watch. He's actually annoyed he has to be in jail over the weekend because if labour day. He views the whole thing as a massive inconvenience for him and has the mentality of "what's the big deal?".Well, as tragic as the story is and how bad I feel for their families, this infograph is absurd.
Nobody is moving all the way into the opposite lane to avoid bikers who are biking conveniently just inside the non-existent shoulder.
The driver was zipped up, probably on suicide watch, and I'm sure his sigh was one of having to wait with his thoughts another few days locked up before he will have a chance to end his own life. Guilt ridden. There's no way he is going to be around much longer.
Point being, he probably deserves it for drinking and driving and ultimately taking the lives of two young men. However, if you look at this infograph and think the boundaries and measurements are anywhere near correct, you're being foolish.
In all likelihood, as the front vehicle moved towards the centre of the road, Higgins was simultaneously finished passing the middle car and was now moving back into the right lane. Again, go look at pictures of the road in question. There is no room for bikers to be tucked in on the shoulder. They would've been out in the road to some degree. Now when he cuts back into the right lane, he has no idea the bikers are there because the vehicle in front of him is blocking them from view. A sober person might realize the lead car is moving out of the way of something for sure.
Even driving solidly in his lane, he would have hit these boys. The idea that he was ripping onto (again) a non-existent shoulder makes no sense.
Terrible timing and circumstance coupled with a drunk driver leads to this tragedy. Now may not be the time to discuss the things @Jumptheshark is, but a lot went wrong here for this to occur. It wasn't a drunk driver blowing through a red light.
Exactly this. It's terrible but true.
Thanks for looking out for me Drai.Just as clarity from reports "the field sobriety" test was used. Not sure why a breathalyzer wasn't utilized either at scene or station. Hopefully its just an error of omissions in initial police reporting. I sure hope they made him blow at some point.
Next, passing on the right is allowed in several jurisdictions, for instance in Canada in Alberta and Ontario. That said that would be only on roads that have 2 or more lanes going one way. Its batshit crazy to pass somebody on the right on a 2 lane blacktop. Doing it at night while impaired is beyond words.
Anytime I'm driving, walking, cycling I remember that people like this live amongst us and are actually out there driving.
We have a kinder, gentler penal system in Canada (in the convicted’s favour, of course).I'm just surprised and shocked as to how many people there are out there that are on their 5,6, or 7th drunk driving conviction. How does this happen when you receive multiple sentences? Seems like the authorities are just waiting for them to kill someone before they get locked up.
I think part of the reason these people aren’t locked up for lengthy periods would be jail and prison overcrowding.I'm just surprised and shocked as to how many people there are out there that are on their 5,6, or 7th drunk driving conviction. How does this happen when you receive multiple sentences? Seems like the authorities are just waiting for them to kill someone before they get locked up.
He is and he will be held accountable. But if lessons are to be drawn for the case it's also about the dangers of biking on country roads at night.Even if they were riding in the middle of the road, he's 100% culpable. A normal, sober, non-brain damaged driver doesn't hit them in that situation. He was drunk, driving aggressively, and impatient, and Johnny Gaudreau and Matthew Gaudreau are dead because of it. It's really that simple.