John Tortorella is a bad coach and a bad person.
There were a couple of those this year.
Plus not letting Coots play a game or two at the end when he ramped up to do so?
John Tortorella is a bad coach and a bad person.
Play Couts and he gets hurt: x&#$%@ medical staffIt's not against Couts, but it sure as f*** is alienating. Wonder if this is considered a knock on Torts by those that favour him.
I'm confused what you are getting at. Are you saying scratching Sanheim in his hometown, when his family came to watch, and not telling him why (and having Sanheim say it hurt him) isn't alienating?Play Couts and he gets hurt: x&#$%@ medical staff
Don't play Couts: Disrepect!!!
Cut me a break.
John Tortorella is a bad coach and a bad person.
Play Couts and he gets hurt: x&#$%@ medical staff
Don't play Couts: Disrepect!!!
Cut me a break.
Yes. I'm biased against overpaid players who don't perform.Your bias is showing.
61 point pace his last 54 games. And yet there are another 90+ guys like that. Shows how far behind everyone else tge Flyers are.I'm happy for Frost. He gave a giant f*** you to everyone who doubted him and he went and played really well in the second half. There's no reason why Farabee - Frost - Tippett is the full time 2nd line going forward. Let them run with it next season.
Yet you defended Hayes for years....Yes. I'm biased against overpaid players who don't perform.
Not at ES scoring, or at ES defense.Who cares if Sanheim is alienated? I mean he just got $48M guaranteed and sucked, he was worse than Risto this year.
And yet you were so hard on Frost, who scored 46 points and only made $800,000.Yes. I'm biased against overpaid players who don't perform.
Who cares if Sanheim is alienated? I mean he just got $48M guaranteed and sucked, he was worse than Risto this year. He's 26, at some point players run out of excuses. He wants to leave town - fine, just find a team that will take your contract.
I hope so. I remember I had tickets to meet and get autos from Brind’Amour at the carnival that year. I was so pissed I almost didn’t go.Did he somehow hurt Clarke's feelings?
I've called him overpaid for years, just like JVR and Voracek.61 point pace his last 54 games. And yet there are another 90+ guys like that. Shows how far behind everyone else tge Flyers are.
Yet you defended Hayes for years....
I want them to keep TK and Frost together next season. They were fantastic together.I'm happy for Frost. He gave a giant f*** you to everyone who doubted him and he went and played really well in the second half. There's no reason why Farabee - Frost - Tippett is the full time 2nd line going forward. Let them run with it next season.
Just to confirm, you do think it's alienating, but you don't care because it happens to him and not Couts?Who cares if Sanheim is alienated? I mean he just got $48M guaranteed and sucked, he was worse than Risto this year. He's 26, at some point players run out of excuses. He wants to leave town - fine, just find a team that will take your contract.
Just to confirm, you do think it's alienating, but you don't care because it happens to him and not Couts?
I'm really struggling to see your rationale on this one if I'm being honest.
It probably wasn't politic, but usually these things are preceded by a stretch in which the player is letting things go in one ear and out the other.Just to confirm, you do think it's alienating, but you don't care because it happens to him and not Couts?
I'm really struggling to see your rationale on this one if I'm being honest.
I understand why you think Sanheim deserves to be alienated, it just seems like you have to do a bunch of mental gymnastics to make this not be something that makes you criticize Torts for, but by your own admission would criticize him for if....he did it to a different player?It probably wasn't politic, but usually these things are preceded by a stretch in which the player is letting things go in one ear and out the other.
Sanheim is one of the few players who didn't show much, if any, improvement this season.
At first I wrote it off to the new contract, then to being forced to play with TDA, but when Risto plays better with almost any other player but you, that's not a good sign.
It may be, like Provorov, both the organization and fans saw more there than there actually was.
Both players only seem to play well with the right partner, which means they're not carrying their pairs. You have to shelter Seeler, but you're paying him the league minimum. When you pay a D-man $6-7M, you want someone who's a key cog on your team, not someone who has to be baby sat.
It probably wasn't politic, but usually these things are preceded by a stretch in which the player is letting things go in one ear and out the other.
Sanheim is one of the few players who didn't show much, if any, improvement this season.
At first I wrote it off to the new contract, then to being forced to play with TDA, but when Risto plays better with almost any other player but you, that's not a good sign.
It may be, like Provorov, both the organization and fans saw more there than there actually was.
Both players only seem to play well with the right partner, which means they're not carrying their pairs. You have to shelter Seeler, but you're paying him the league minimum. When you pay a D-man $6-7M, you want someone who's a key cog on your team, not someone who has to be baby sat.
Funny, York had no problem figuring out what Torts wanted.
Maybe college kids are smarter?
The fact that York came up and clearly outplayed Provorov and Sanheim by a wide margin is disturbing. I think he faded a little at the end of the season, but he was still clearly the best D-man on the team at 21.
Even if players were feeling out Torts, by December 7, when JVR returned, Cates moved to center and York was brought up, they should have figure it out by then. Most of the players made significant improvements after that point, including Provorov, TDA and Risto.
I understand why you think Sanheim deserves to be alienated, it just seems like you have to do a bunch of mental gymnastics to make this not be something that makes you criticize Torts for, but by your own admission would criticize him for if....he did it to a different player?
I guess you're just okay with him alienating players who you think deserve it? I vehemently disagree that Sanheim deserves this treatment, but even if you think that is the case, why is it okay to alienate him? Shouldn't a good coach......avoid alienating key roster players signed to long term deals?
Not to mention how much you defend Hayes and his signing, after 2+ seasons of disappointment? Would you have supported AV/Yeo alienating Hayes last season?