John Tortorella Named (Part Time) Head Coach Discussion

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Remember that a couple months ago the team was also scoring and winning via east-west and possession hockey and he vowed to shut it down to get back to grinding. And the scoring stopped right after.

After years spent with Gordon, Lappy, Hakstol, AV, and Tortorella, we probably need to turn over the entire roster and prospect pool to purge the contamination of bad hockey that's been taught. That's why this is going to be a decade long process. They really have to start over, and they haven't begun.
Sell the team....
 
Hoooooly shit. Think about what he’s actually saying here.



“Even though we scored, we didn’t stray away from what I focus on: grinding.”

Meaning grinding is what he thinks is important, not the scoring. Thats being treated as merely a potential distraction from what he thinks matters most.

At this point, anyone denying that he’s a dinosaur is just lying. It’s not even arguable, it’s not a matter of opinion. He openly and loudly dislikes offense/skill/youth and fetishizes grinding/goons/defense.

def. not a dinosaur thou..


LOOOOL....
 
Hoooooly shit. Think about what he’s actually saying here.



“Even though we scored, we didn’t stray away from what I focus on: grinding.”

Meaning grinding is what he thinks is important, not the scoring. Thats being treated as merely a potential distraction from what he thinks matters most.

At this point, anyone denying that he’s a dinosaur is just lying. It’s not even arguable, it’s not a matter of opinion. He openly and loudly dislikes offense/skill/youth and fetishizes grinding/goons/defense.


He had the Rangers grinding so hard that f***ing Alain Vigneault took them to a cup finals after taking over just by virtue of not being Torts. Probably shortened Girardi's career by a few years having him eat a puck buffet every game.

Even his cup win with Tampa where he played 3 forwards 30 minutes a game and rode a hot goalie and Fedotenko's insane hot streak was a perfect example of what not to do for 99% of teams and situations.
 
He had the Rangers grinding so hard that f***ing Alain Vigneault took them to a cup finals after taking over just by virtue of not being Torts. Probably shortened Girardi's career by a few years having him eat a puck buffet every game.

Even his cup win with Tampa where he played 3 forwards 30 minutes a game and rode a hot goalie and Fedotenko's insane hot streak was a perfect example of what not to do for 99% of teams and situations.

Ironically, Tampa only got past the Flyers in 2004 because our blueline was so ravaged by injuries that 5'8 RW Sami Kapanen played DEFENSE at times. The Flyers win that in 6 with a healthy D and face Calgary in the Finals. Then maybe the Hockey world would have been spared the next 19 years of Torts.
 
Ironically, Tampa only got past the Flyers in 2004 because our blueline was so ravaged by injuries that 5'8 RW Sami Kapanen played DEFENSE at times. The Flyers win that in 6 with a healthy D and face Calgary in the Finals. Then maybe the Hockey world would have been spared the next 19 years of Torts.
Well, you can also blame Clarke for the lack of depth on the blueline because he decided it would be a good idea to trade Weinrich, Vandemeer (packaged for Zhamnov) and Therien. At least one of Weinrich and Therien should have been kept
 
Correct. Cut and dry. Very clear. No grey area.
in your world sure.

Neither of the 2 were going to play. He moved them to do them a solid and find a place to play. Should he have kept one of them, even if they were going to be a disgruntled employee, that is a valid conversation to have. To say he doesn’t like depth is a false narrative. Keep pushing.
 
in your world sure.

Neither of the 2 were going to play. He moved them to do them a solid and find a place to play. Should he have kept one of them, even if they were going to be a disgruntled employee, that is a valid conversation to have. To say he doesn’t like depth is a false narrative. Keep pushing.

I've noticed you're taking my posts on this too seriously
 
  • Like
Reactions: kudymen
in your world sure.

Neither of the 2 were going to play. He moved them to do them a solid and find a place to play. Should he have kept one of them, even if they were going to be a disgruntled employee, that is a valid conversation to have. To say he doesn’t like depth is a false narrative. Keep pushing.
Bob Clarke said multiple times he didn't like having veteran players sitting in the press box every night as healthy scratches. It's bad for the morale of the team having a disgruntled player who's never playing hanging around, and it's not fair to the player if he could be playing regularly on another team.

Bob Clarke tried doing a veteran Eric Weinrich a solid by trading him when he was stuck way too deep on the Flyers' depth chart and not playing.

Did it backfire when the Flyers' defense corps had a rash of injuries that I don't think anyone could predict? Yes, it backfired.
 
It’s a lie is what it is. Frost-Tippett / Farabee-Cates / Laughton-Hayes. Wow, that was difficult. Or just ice 2 defensemen on every unit with a below average defensive group.

It’s a refusal to admit wrongness. Nothing more, nothing less. Which is a great trait in a coach, especially such a forward thinking offensive minded one.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad