Magua
Entirely Palatable Product
Loser. Energy.
"When the time comes, and we get on the other side of it......"
Loser. Energy.
"When the time comes, and we get on the other side of it......"
COVID, injuries, and AV.Of course the advisors think Charles Entertainment Fletcher got dealt a bad hand with injuries. Did they use that excuse the previous 2 seasons as well?
I actually was encouraged by his presser. Yeah that was a dumb answer...but it was also a dumb question.listening to him bleat on about how hockey needs more fighting back in makes me really hang my head in shame..
jesus hes not only a dino hes a godam super dino
Every good team does the cycle, the better teams are better at it, they win board battles, get players to the net, and make good passes to set up high danger shots.He can certainly put them in better position to score and allow them to do more than cycle the perimeter.
And Tortorella may not be a member of the Clarke cult, but he exemplifies the hockey they think is best. Hockey from an era that's gone.
Our only real hope is that he's a little two-faced bastard who knows the brain trust is out to lunch and is just playing along with them to land the job.Briere was hand picked and groomed by the clowns that got us into this situation.
It’s more of the same.
I’m not saying he’s a guaranteed flop but I wouldn’t expect much.
That's some Tolkien level fantasy. I'm sure that will be used in the future in defense of him.Our only real hope is that he's a little two-faced bastard who knows the brain trust is out to lunch and is just playing along with them to land the job.
Hmm, I wonder where he got the idea for that question from.Oconnor directly asked him the million dollar question...why play old guys like seeler n braun at this point? He didnt dismiss it...he praised the question and said its time to start playing young guys.
It's not ridiculous at all, if the veterans are struggling to adjust to the new schemes (and it's not just D-men, it's forwards reading the play and covering for D-men when they attack the O-zone), playing a bunch of rookies will just compound the situation and hinder their development (blind leading the blind). Right now, York is playing 1st pair minutes, PP and PK in LHV, he wouldn't be doing that in Philly.Hmm, I wonder where he got the idea for that question from.
It's ridiculous that Seeler, Braun and Risto have played every game of this 10 game losing streak - that's 30 games total for the bottom three dmen. At least 5 of those games should have gone to Zamula or York or Attard.
It's not ridiculous at all, if the veterans are struggling to adjust to the new schemes (and it's not just D-men, it's forwards reading the play and covering for D-men when they attack the O-zone), playing a bunch of rookies will just compound the situation and hinder their development (blind leading the blind). Right now, York is playing 1st pair minutes, PP and PK in LHV, he wouldn't be doing that in Philly.
You can see what happens when you play too many inexperienced players in situations where they're over their head, just look at the forwards. It would certainly help Frost or Cates to have a competent veteran winger.
As the team gets comfortable with roles and responsibilities, they'll gradually work in prospects. Torts was explicit about that, he sent Zamula down to get a full week of practice and two games, then brought him back to play him. If Risto can settle in with Sanheim, the third pair can be used to audition York and Attard down the road. When Atkinson, Laughton, JVR and TK return, players like Frost and Cates and Tippett can play in lower pressure roles.
After the TDL, good chance JVR, Braun, Seeler, maybe Sedlak or MacEwen will be gone. Provorov might be traded this summer.
The roster could look very different this spring, and with more changes by next October.
What if the veterans aren't struggling to adapt, what if they just f***ing suck? These are after all players you insisted would never be regulars. Due to how much they suck.
Then trying out higher upside players would be the better idea. The notion that Tortorella's schemes are so complex we have to cancel the revolving door is laughable. He himself has claimed he's greatly dumbed it all down because he's too lazy to figure out how to communicate it.
The roster isn't going to look different. Unless you mean it'll be even older.
Brought him back to play, f*** off with that shit. DeAngelo is out.
Utter f***ing fantasy.
Beef, you didn't hear? The complex schemes is the new justification of why the sucked the first ten games and why we can't use that sample size to try and show anything. Only the last 12, or whatever it is now, can be used.
Yeah but those regressing to the mean underlying stats are niceeeee.You mean the last 12 where they've lost nonstop and treat offense like an aggressive grinding defense, an old Tortorella staple?
It's not ridiculous at all, if the veterans are struggling to adjust to the new schemes (and it's not just D-men, it's forwards reading the play and covering for D-men when they attack the O-zone), playing a bunch of rookies will just compound the situation and hinder their development (blind leading the blind).