John Moore's hit on Dale Weise - Suspended 2 games - Video in post 177

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Insane. And so.....arbitrary. So now the lack of an injury DOESN'T matter? Consistency = zero.
 
More ammo to think that the league wants the Habs in the finals instead of New York Rangers. Now The Rangers are playing 8 on 6 as we should include the league officials and the refs.
 
Yea, considering no injury + first time 1 game was probably right.

Personally I thought it was a carbon copy of Prust. So based on the act 2 games to 2 games seems reasonable. It is just showing that the NHL's arguments are BS.

If the video says this was head contact but Prust's was not that is a joke. And Moore already got 5 + game.
 
Wasn't the same as all since Prust's was twice as late and involved a player who has been suspended before.

Multiple suspensions and injuries are modifiers for hits. They are supposed to increase the suspension length. Here, they did nothing since the league somehow ignored both.

I really just think they come up with their explanations on the fly for these videos. The lengths, on the other hand, doesn't seem to be a problem I have, for the most part.

When a player doesn't get injured, everyone complains because he could have. When they do get injured, everyone complains he was injured. Everyone cries bias whenever anything happens.
 
I can't see how "fair" could possibly explain this suspension.

Prust got an extra game for an injury. Moore got an extra game for stupidity. That's the way I see it. Similar hit to Prust just not as late. Even though it was stupid because of all the talk about the Prust hit, I have to admit I loved it at the time. Old time hockey.
 
Annoys me to no end that Moore got suspended the same amount of games as Prust and STILL got a 5 minute major to Prust's freebie.
 
This is a ****ing joke. Should never have been more than one game. Prust hit was way worse in every way, yet they get the same punishment. Ridiculous.
 
bizarre how a repeat offender who injured a player with a very late hit that went unpunished during the game gets the same punishment as a first time offender who didnt cause injury and only is suspended because the player wasnt looking in front of where he was skating. moore essentially got more punishment from the hit because he actually got a major and game misconduct on the ice. laughably biased decision from my heart is in montreal quintal.
 
Prust got an extra game for an injury. Moore got an extra game for stupidity. That's the way I see it.

What?

So injury and history really don't matter.

Yep. Disgraceful.

I really just think they come up with their explanations on the fly for these videos. The lengths, on the other hand, doesn't seem to be a problem I have, for the most part.

When a player doesn't get injured, everyone complains because he could have. When they do get injured, everyone complains he was injured. Everyone cries bias whenever anything happens.

I have a problem with the explanations and the length. Prust's hit would have been ONE game had it not been for the injury. So how does a non-injury here garner two? That right there is a full game more suspension than Prust would have gotten otherwise.
 
It was the same hit as Prust's but without an injury.

Not really. Stepan was attempting to skate around another player. Weise is just looking at his pass, his body is moving in the same direction as when he passed it, Moore was committed to the hit before Weise passed the puck, Prust's hit was late enough that Stepan had time to start moving in a different direction before he even committed to the hit.
 
Annoys me to no end that Moore got suspended the same amount of games as Prust and STILL got a 5 minute major to Prust's freebie.

Yup. So Moore actually got a more severe punishment. AND, we lost a player for a game.

Unreal.
 
What?



Yep. Disgraceful.



I have a problem with the explanations and the length. Prust's hit would have been ONE game had it not been for the injury. So how does a non-injury here garner two? That right there is a full game more suspension than Prust would have gotten otherwise.

I really don't think Prust would have gotten one game despite what Quintal said. The lengths really are fine and they should never base if off of an injury. They just need to word their videos better because it seems like they think the fans are stupid.
 
Obvious decision. Tit for tat. Did anyone think it would be less?

exactly.

Anyway, Moore shouldn't have got less. Prust should have got more.

HE's back next game though right? Can only be a good thing for the rangers.
 
Just watched the video. It's because the NHL offices believe the initial point of contact is the head.

.....or something.

Still, first timer. No injury.

2 games for being a Ranger. The league is just not used to guys wearing our uniform hitting people that hard, lol.
 
I really don't think Prust would have gotten one game despite what Quintal said. The lengths really are fine and they should never base if off of an injury. They just need to word their videos better because it seems like they think the fans are stupid.

It's well known that injury and suspension history are modifiers. So I don't really see why what Sluggo said shouldn't be taken at face value.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad