Joe Hallenback
Moderator
- Mar 4, 2005
- 15,564
- 22,222
Joni Pitkanen - do not want. He will instantly be the whipping boy on this team. Gigantic but soft as a marshmallow. No way he's a TN type player.
Keep in mind this is from a guy who OWNS a Pitkanen jersey
Pittsburg has four top LHD prospects in Despres, Dumoulin, Harrington and Pouliot. That's behind Maatta on the left side too. Despres is 6'4", moves nicely, but seems to be out of favour. Think I'd like Harrington out of the group, but Despres may come cheapest. We need someone who can slot in long term behind Toby, if they won't put Buff back there.
Pittsburg has four top LHD prospects in Despres, Dumoulin, Harrington and Pouliot. That's behind Maatta on the left side too. Despres is 6'4", moves nicely, but seems to be out of favour. Think I'd like Harrington out of the group, but Despres may come cheapest. We need someone who can slot in long term behind Toby, if they won't put Buff back there.
I'd be all over Gormely if we could get him for the right price.
Pittsburg's LHD prospects definitely fit the bill. I would also love to see Gormely as a LHD in our system. With OEL being a lock on the left, and Yandle with 2 more years on his deal, have to wonder where he fits. Maybe on the 3rd pair until Yandle moves on?
Another team and situation that comes to mind is Chicago with Pirri and Morin.
Despres, Dumoulin, Harrington, Gormley
Pirri, Morin, Connolly
The reason I was thinking about this is I like when Chevy was asked last year if he was a buyer or a seller and he answered "yes". If the Jets do indeed decide to move on from a UFA or two this TD, I would love to see them try to target some more NHL ready prospects in the above (and others), as opposed to focusing on picks. Most of the above would help us as soon as next season.
Soft or not, I would hope the Jets consider anybody who could make the team better. Plus, the Jets need a #4 Left D and it isn't like there will be a glut of quality LD on the market - especially if they want to stay young-ish. Andrej Meszaros, Andre Benoit, Kyle Quincey and Nikita Nikitin likely top the list.
Pittsburg's LHD prospects definitely fit the bill. I would also love to see Gormely as a LHD in our system. With OEL being a lock on the left, and Yandle with 2 more years on his deal, have to wonder where he fits. Maybe on the 3rd pair until Yandle moves on?
Another team and situation that comes to mind is Chicago with Pirri and Morin.
Despres, Dumoulin, Harrington, Gormley
Pirri, Morin, Connolly
The reason I was thinking about this is I like when Chevy was asked last year if he was a buyer or a seller and he answered "yes". If the Jets do indeed decide to move on from a UFA or two this TD, I would love to see them try to target some more NHL ready prospects in the above (and others), as opposed to focusing on picks. Most of the above would help us as soon as next season.
Can someone propose a trade with Pittsburg in the Trade Forum?? I'd really like to see their responses but as a "Rookie User" I can't propose a trade on there.
I know that many of their fans are keen on both Stuart & Gooch. Would something around those two guys, for Depres & a second make sense. They may counter with a third or another prospect, but I'd be real happy to get a quality LHD in a trade like that.
I don't know if it would be beneficial. They have a high value on Despres, and will all likely say no to something around Seto.
It would likely turn into them trying to get one of Kane, Ladd, or Wheeler before it even got to page 2.
Hey guys, Pens fan here. I came here thinking we would make good trading partners and I see you guys think the same. Just curious if Ladd could possibly be had for the right price, and what that price would be. I was thinking something along the lines of Sutter, Pouliot, and our 1st.
I'm not sure what the deal is with Jokinen after this season, but Sutter would be a cheap solid option for your 3C. He will probably be looking for something around 2.5-3 per. Plus a blue chip prospect in Pouliot to possibly pair with Trouba moving forward, and a late 1st.
Thoughts?
Hey guys, Pens fan here. I came here thinking we would make good trading partners and I see you guys think the same. Just curious if Ladd could possibly be had for the right price, and what that price would be. I was thinking something along the lines of Sutter, Pouliot, and our 1st.
I'm not sure what the deal is with Jokinen after this season, but Sutter would be a cheap solid option for your 3C. He will probably be looking for something around 2.5-3 per. Plus a blue chip prospect in Pouliot to possibly pair with Trouba moving forward, and a late 1st.
Thoughts?
I like the idea of getting Sutter to have a more long-term solution to our third line, but isn't Pouliot strikingly similar to Morrissey in terms of playstyle? Somebody with more knowledge could help me out here but if he really is closer to Morrissey I'd rather not give up our captain to get him.
Can someone propose a trade with Pittsburg in the Trade Forum?? I'd really like to see their responses but as a "Rookie User" I can't propose a trade on there.
I know that many of their fans are keen on both Stuart & Gooch. Would something around those two guys, for Depres & a second make sense. They may counter with a third or another prospect, but I'd be real happy to get a quality LHD in a trade like that.
Pouliot is like Morrisey except without one ounce of hockey sense. Has the natural skills but lacks the tool box. Often lost defensively, takes bad chances and hasn't sprung forward offensively due to that lack of hockey sense as well (depends too much on his skating). I literally LOLed when Pittsburgh took him #9 (I had him at #28). He is basically a less developed Paul Postma (and that's if he starts to figure the game out a little better even). Not interested in him at all, he is certainly no bluechip prospect.
Sutter isn't really a necessary piece either. Don't see much beyond a 3rd line C there myself. Late first is late first. Not an interesting package for Ladd, IMO.
Pouliot is like Morrisey except without one ounce of hockey sense. Has the natural skills but lacks the tool box. Often lost defensively, takes bad chances and hasn't sprung forward offensively due to that lack of hockey sense as well (depends too much on his skating). I literally LOLed when Pittsburgh took him #9 (I had him at #28). He is basically a less developed Paul Postma (and that's if he starts to figure the game out a little better even). Not interested in him at all, he is certainly no bluechip prospect.
Sutter isn't really a necessary piece either. Don't see much beyond a 3rd line C there myself. Late first is late first. Not an interesting package for Ladd, IMO.
I don't understand that tweet, does he mean trade values of our UFAs? I don't see Chevy selling if our success continues.
edit: I sent Lawless a DM (he follows me) for clarification.
@garylawless: smart hockey guy in #sochi said to me about recent #nhljets success, "this gives them a chance to make changes and get better." values r up
It's hard to believe that NHL GM's are that dumb...I wouldn't have traded for player x 3 weeks ago, but he's played so well in the last 8 games, so now I'll be sure to hand over an asset for him.