I agree, and I was under the impression that when making statements like this (I've seen others on other threads), you need to point to something substantial to bolster these sorts of statements. Not a "I know a guy who knew a guy", or "it's obvious by just the look on his face or the way he talks".
Like I said, I've seen similar statements without any clear indication of what evidence of bad behavior/attitude actually exists.
On a moderating note about this.
If you have been vetted by the admin staff here you can make "insider" statements on the info you know about (for example garretts stuff or when i talk about a very select number of players i know about in guys like hall phaneuf toews).
Generalized statements like i think so and so was not well liked or has character issues because of these reasons ive seen in media or on ice or heard about from media thats fine as well (like when i talk about thinking subban or kadri have character issues/not leaders). Thats just my opinion of their character and im entitled to that.
If you start saying player a has a drug problem, or player b slept with players c's wife or something then that falls under libel if you cannot support that with sources. If you start claiming player d told you player e is a cancer, or i know such and such about player f due to my contacts thats outlandish claims of insider info unless you are vetted by admin staff.
Hope that clears this up.