I dunno why you're generalizing when i said i would do it (value-wise) and gave the reason why management might not (need-wise).
Things aren't black or white in real world hockey land like they are on HF, there's a lot of grey (teams look to make trades that are close value-wise but work better need-wise). When there's an A prospect that fills a big organizational need then odds are that he won't be a name mentioned in trade talks.
When you're the one making the offer you have the advantage of offering pieces that are expendable to you (which doesn't mean that they're bad), Dvorak is a solid 2 way center who's easily capable of 40-50 points a season but he just doesn't fit MTL's timeline (he was acquired during MB's time to compete).
Beck's upside is what Dvorak can top out at in a good situation but the difference is Beck is young (and developed by the team, there's a certain comfort level between the team and the player) and fits with MTL's rebuild timeline... are the Jets rebuilding or competing? There's no guarantee that Beck can become what Dvorak is, it's just that Dvorak is gonna be gone by the time our contention window kicks in.
If you read my post again, I never said anything about you or your post (quoted it bc it echoed the Habs GM's comments to a degree). I was more responding the the Habs GM's comments, he seems to be thinking pool A is unavailable for any lateral moves, but pool B he's willing to trade & far more disposable, problem is pool B isn't all that attractive in any trade of Rutger's level specfically in any one for one situation and four quarters isn't the same as a dollar.
I didn't comment on Beck or Dvorak, but being you brought them up. Dvorak isn't even a piece Chevy (IMO) would consider in any one for one trade (a UFA & turning 30 years old in Feb), I'm not entirely sure he even has positive trade value TBH but I'm not slagging on Dvorak, but he's a non starter. Beck I wouldn't even do one for one, his upside is too low IMO, looks to be more of a 3C potential. Beck is a center which is good but his upside is too low, again not slagging him, I would love to have him but I wouldn't be doing any one for one trade for him with Rutger.
As I've stated before fans don't know the details of GM chats or what they want, so we shall see how it goes. By reports online sounds like about 5-6 teams are being reported in on Rutger, we shall see how it unfolds, no guarantees from me on any outcome (but generally demand helps drive value). If you listen to Chevy's comments post FA frenzy he very openly states the door is very open for a our young players to step up and take/earn roles so sounds like he's very open to an injection of youth into the lineup.