Player Discussion Jeremy Swayman II - still waiting

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
14,359
19,646
Las Vegas
Yep and he had more than a season of being the number 1 goalie by then. He took over for injured Thomas in 2010 before giving it back to Timmy the next two years. Then obviously was starter the year before he signed

He didnt though. 2010 was split time, he started 39 games that year. 2013 while technically a starter's load, it isnt anything more than Swayman has done to this point since it was a shortened season in which he started 34 games (out of 48).

The one thing Rask had at the time of his deal that Swayman doesn't is the Finals run and that's as much about team quality as it is quality of play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
9,389
18,633
No you don't. Team makes an offer, player makes a counter offer. They then proceed to negotiate. Comps are used for arbitration to convince an impartial judge what they deserve in pay. As both sides are biased with their comps and will not be swayed by any one the other side uses, they are irrelevant. The team and the player know exactly what the market is with no comps needed, so now they're playing the game of how do I get the player for less than the going rate and the player is trying to get the team to pay more than market value.
How do you know what market value or going rate is without using comps?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoBs

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
9,743
10,629
NWO
He didnt though. 2010 was split time, he started 39 games that year. 2013 while technically a starter's load, it isnt anything more than Swayman has done to this point since it was a shortened season in which he started 34 games (out of 48).

The one thing Rask had at the time of his deal that Swayman doesn't is the Finals run and that's as much about team quality as it is quality of play.
Yeah I stand corrected my bad
 

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,113
11,295
Giving him 8 years is risky unless its a lower cap number ~ under 8

Four years at $6.5 allows him to prove he can handle workload and lead a team to a Cup

This also allows him to live where he wants


Haha

Was talking to Eric about this

Sway is bright I bet he would do very well in any school but the Bruins guys are all Ivy League economic, finance, and law background

Sway
1. Focus on hockey
2. Don’t shit on your biggest fans
If a gm a traded a vezina winner for a 3m cap dump and a late 1st WITHOUT knowing if the guy they had could handle the load...

said GM needs to be fired immediately.
 

Absurdity

light switch connoisseur
Jul 6, 2012
11,197
7,671
The magic number will be around 8M and term at 6 years. I worry that one GM will offer Swayman an offer sheet that Sweeney will have to match.

The Cap is the creation of Jeremy Jacobs - 20 years ago there was no season mainly because Jacobs was fed up with Mike Ilitch willing to lose money to win a Cup.

Today can Sweeney make the numbers work? :dunno:

I think the Bruins match that offer, but two 1st’s, one 2nd, and one 3rd round pick for a goaltender that hasn't played a full season yet makes you think.
 

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
9,389
18,633
Because everyone knows what the CBA says and what top players in the league get in terms of AAV?
I don’t understand what the CBA would have to do with market value or going rate. Or what McDavid or Mackinnon get, much less Shesterkin. How does any of that help determine what the going rate is for Swayman?
 

dugg133

Registered User
Jan 11, 2023
1,505
3,809
The magic number will be around 8M and term at 6 years. I worry that one GM will offer Swayman an offer sheet that Sweeney will have to match.

The Cap is the creation of Jeremy Jacobs - 20 years ago there was no season mainly because Jacobs was fed up with Mike Ilitch willing to lose money to win a Cup.

Today can Sweeney make the numbers work? :dunno:

I'm no cap expert or anything, but I've been messing around on PuckPedia and I believe we can make basically any number work up to around 9.5mil work. We'd need to send Korpisalo to Providence, have Bussi as the backup, and run a 22 man roster, but it'd be possible. If Swayman is deadset on 10mil I think we'd need to shed salary somehow. Maybe they could play the waivers game with Peeke like we did with Foligno in 2022 and get enough cap relief that way?
 

DKH

Worst Poster/Awful Takes
Feb 27, 2002
76,073
56,239
If a gm a traded a vezina winner for a 3m cap dump and a late 1st WITHOUT knowing if the guy they had could handle the load...

said GM needs to be fired immediately.
lol

Shouldn’t you be removing gum from under desks and sharpening #2 pencils
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiggityDog

LSCII

Cup driven
Mar 1, 2002
50,693
22,346
Central MA
I don’t understand what the CBA would have to do with market value or going rate. Or what McDavid or Mackinnon get, much less Shesterkin. How does any of that help determine what the going rate is for Swayman?
CBA sets the ASL for the players, the process of RFA status, and what the options are. It's literally the framework they're operating under for this entire process, no?

As for what the going rates are for players, the highest paid players in the league make 10-12.6 mill today in terms of AAV ,regardless of position. If the Bruins don't view him as a top player in the league and don't want to pay him as one, it's up to them to negotiate a deal that they're comfortable with or trade him. Either way, comparing him to the top paid goalies or the top paid players is completely arbitrary because it's still on the team and player to negotiate with each other to reach a deal since they both opted to not go to arbitration.

The Bruins could literally pick the worst goalie in the league as a comp and Swayman's team could pick the best, and neither of those would matter because neither side is going to agree with the other sides assessments. It's on them to negotiate a deal both are amenable to or move on. Simple as that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CHRDANHUTCH

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,422
37,066
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
I'm no cap expert or anything, but I've been messing around on PuckPedia and I believe we can make basically any number work up to around 9.5mil work. We'd need to send Korpisalo to Providence, have Bussi as the backup, and run a 22 man roster, but it'd be possible. If Swayman is deadset on 10mil I think we'd need to shed salary somehow. Maybe they could play the waivers game with Peeke like we did with Foligno in 2022 and get enough cap relief that way?
They can make $10 million work
 

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
9,389
18,633
CBA sets the ASL for the players, the process of RFA status, and what the options are. It's literally the framework they're operating under for this entire process, no?

As for what the going rates are for players, the highest paid players in the league make 10-12.6 mill today in terms of AAV ,regardless of position. If the Bruins don't view him as a top player in the league and don't want to pay him as one, it's up to them to negotiate a deal that they're comfortable with or trade him. Either way, comparing him to the top paid goalies or the top paid players is completely arbitrary because it's still on the team and player to negotiate with each other to reach a deal since they both opted to not go to arbitration.

The Bruins could literally pick the worst goalie in the league as a comp and Swayman's team could pick the best, and neither of those would matter because neither side is going to agree with the other sides assessments. It's on them to negotiate a deal both are amenable to or move on. Simple as that.
In the top 100 of AAV for this coming year, there are 63 forwards, 32 D, and 5 goalies. There is no "regardless of position". What Mackinnon or Panarin or Matthews get paid has absolutely nothing to do with what goalies are paid, other that they're governed by the same CBA (not sure why that needs to be said, but following along with you). Apparently there's no convincing you that comps don't have anything to do with pay (despite the fact that you used your own comps in the paragraph above), but even Swayman himself said he can't screw up the market for the next group of goalies coming behind him. Why would he say that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Hungus

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
9,743
10,629
NWO
I think the Bruins match that offer, but two 1st’s, one 2nd, and one 3rd round pick for a goaltender that hasn't played a full season yet makes you think.
It's a nice offer but given their current roster I don't see how giving up a core player for only picks would make sense. Sure they can flip those picks, but you better get a top 6C back if you move on from him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

TD Charlie

Registered User
Sep 10, 2007
37,806
18,912
It's a nice offer but given their current roster I don't see how giving up a core player for only picks would make sense. Sure they can flip those picks, but you better get a top 6C back if you move on from him
It doesn't, at all.
 

dugg133

Registered User
Jan 11, 2023
1,505
3,809
They can make $10 million work
How? The following roster leaves them with 9.7mil in space according to PuckPedia's roster builder:

Zacha-Lindholm-Pasta
Marchand-Coyle-Lysell
Frederic-Poitras-Geekie
Jones-Beecher-Kastelic

Lindholm-Mac
Zadorov-Carlo
Lohrei-Peeke

xxxxx/Bussi

Brazeau, Wotherspoon as the only extras.

Can maybe scrap together another like 200k by sending Kastelic and Lysell down and replacing them with league min guys, but besides that I don't see where the fat is to trim.
 

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,480
18,773
Connecticut
In the top 100 of AAV for this coming year, there are 63 forwards, 32 D, and 5 goalies. There is no "regardless of position". What Mackinnon or Panarin or Matthews get paid has absolutely nothing to do with what goalies are paid, other that they're governed by the same CBA (not sure why that needs to be said, but following along with you). Apparently there's no convincing you that comps don't have anything to do with pay (despite the fact that you used your own comps in the paragraph above), but even Swayman himself said he can't screw up the market for the next group of goalies coming behind him. Why would he say that?


You kind of left the first part of his comment out of this. His full statement was.....

"I understand the cap is going up and where it will be in years. I understand my comparables and how I can’t ruin the goalie market for other guys that are going to be in my shoes down the line."

The "not ruining the goalie market" comment was him basically saying that his contract could/will be used for other goalies/teams in contract talks in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bruinswillwin77

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
9,389
18,633
You kind of left the first part of his comment out of this. His full statement was.....

"I understand the cap is going up and where it will be in years. I understand my comparables and how I can’t ruin the goalie market for other guys that are going to be in my shoes down the line."

The "not ruining the goalie market" comment was him basically saying that his contract could/will be used for other goalies/teams in contract talks in the future.
Exactly. So...comparables. The point I've been trying to get through to Lonnie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad