Pens x
Registered User
- Oct 8, 2016
- 16,393
- 8,177
Maybe he thinks Letang and Geno are re-signing? I doubt he’d want to stick around for two more years for a rebuild.
I don't think there's any question he's adding something to l1 and the pp. Producing at a > PPG rate is very good.
Neat. So were McCann and Rodrigues.
I'm actually ok with this. But also, wtf does this mean for Blueger and his role on this team?
Didn't expect this at this point in the season but I like the signing
Carter has been very solid for us and I don't see a drastic drop off in the 2 years, even so he will be at 3 mil his last season.
Nice thing is he can play C or W and if we have to move him to one of those positions to fill a better player we have that option, add to the fact he seems like a great team guy and knows what it takes to win.
Minimal risk
People wanted to pay him $3 or $4 million per year, on a multi year deal as recently as a month ago.Erod was for a month playing top lines and top pp. He has 1pt in his last like 11 now.
What Bryan Rust is doing is dope as f***.
But if we're looking at what we expect him to do going forwards, we need to cool our jets a little. Rust's scoring is a huge candidate for regression unless you think he's natural talent a guy who should be around 6th in the league for ppg, between MacKinnon and Huberdeau, quite a bit ahead of Sid, Jake, and Geno.
If you think that you sign him for 6 x 6m today, and you do it quick while you can keep a straight face.
If you don't think that, you've got to work out a sensible expected rate to compare him to alternatives to.
I don't see it. Playoffs in the NHL are a meat grinder, and that's after a long regular season. Is this team built for playoffs?
Ovehckin is probably banking on the fact the Capitals would never trade him. Things would have to go down hill real fast for him in which case who's going to want him at that price? Or the team goes down hill real fast in which case, maybe he'd be fine with a trade? Forgoing the NMC probably got him some extra money and he effectively has a NMC anyway.I'm perfectly willing to be proven wrong (and would be delighted if so), Peat. It's just wild to me that Carter has a stronger NMC than Ovechkin.
Surely worrying about this team's playoff suitability is all the more reason to put a priority on keeping one of the team's bigger stronger guys, who scored 5 in 6 in the last playoffs and has a long history of production there? Sure you worry about the legs, but an older Cullen went though the playoffs playing 14 minutes a night just fine.
You're talking about 1 of the 2 losses they suffered in the last month and half?If the Pens didn't have an aging core, I wouldn't mind Carter. Cullen was here during our core's prime.
But a thought, a few weeks back the Pens took on the Kings, the team that Carter wanted to stay with, the team that decided it was time to move on. The Pens were beaten in every facet of the game, out worked, out hit, out chanced, out skated........ it was embarrassing.
You could say it was just a bad night for the B & G....... Not me, I hoped it would fire a warning shot to the FO that this team needed to get some energy on this roster and quick. They obviously saw it as a bad night.
I dunno, man. If you are giving an NMC to a role player, you should at least see a discount. Give the dude a modified NTC, or something.
It's not the Tanev contract, but it's not the best thing ever. I'd rate it a solid B.
A drop off is only one of many concerns.
You are locking up Cap $'s and a roster spot for 2 additional years when you had all of the leverage. Winning streaks in the middle of the season mean nothing, other than a winning streak mid season. It's all so short sighted in my opinion. I guess a lot of this goes back to the playoff series against the Isles and how close management thinks they were to winning that one and beyond.
I don't see it. Playoffs in the NHL are a meat grinder, and that's after a long regular season. Is this team built for playoffs?
You are locking out cheaper younger players from a roster spot for a player at the very end of his career. He has an NMC which now gives him leverage and will cost you assets if you decide in 14 months you have to move him, and if he's agreeable to said move.
Do we know if Z put in the same spot for 25 would be equal to or even greater.......at a lower cost with fresh young legs??
Do we know what player might be playing his way off of his current team and might be exactly what this team needs for this year or next?
Do we know who will be available in FA, younger, tougher and possibly a steal for equal $'s?
I was hoping that this upcoming offseason would finally be the one where they infused youth and dynamic with the roster. This signing signals that they want nothing of the sort.
It looks like I'm crazy after the streak they have been on the past 45 days............ We'll revisit after the playoffs.
A drop off is only one of many concerns.
You are locking up Cap $'s and a roster spot for 2 additional years when you had all of the leverage. Winning streaks in the middle of the season mean nothing, other than a winning streak mid season. It's all so short sighted in my opinion. I guess a lot of this goes back to the playoff series against the Isles and how close management thinks they were to winning that one and beyond.
I don't see it. Playoffs in the NHL are a meat grinder, and that's after a long regular season. Is this team built for playoffs?
You are locking out cheaper younger players from a roster spot for a player at the very end of his career. He has an NMC which now gives him leverage and will cost you assets if you decide in 14 months you have to move him, and if he's agreeable to said move.
Do we know if Z put in the same spot for 25 would be equal to or even greater.......at a lower cost with fresh young legs??
Do we know what player might be playing his way off of his current team and might be exactly what this team needs for this year or next?
Do we know who will be available in FA, younger, tougher and possibly a steal for equal $'s?
I was hoping that this upcoming offseason would finally be the one where they infused youth and dynamic with the roster. This signing signals that they want nothing of the sort.
It looks like I'm crazy after the streak they have been on the past 45 days............ We'll revisit after the playoffs.
definitely was a bad game…I’ll be interested in seeing how they look Sunday against LAK…but the Kings, Stars, Flames have been bad matchups for the Pens this year and in the past in some cases because of their heavily defensive style…
true test of how much age matters in our centers will be the playoffs…I believe it’s fine if our wings are young and speedy…which is why I wouldn’t be interested in re-signing Rust and we need to move Zucker out…
Indeed, it will an interesting watch. I should also note that those teams will only ramp up that style more in a series, where fatigue and injuries show up the longer a series lasts.
I understand that all of those team are in the West, but TB, Fla, Wash, Boston can all play the same type of game.
I feel like as a 29 year old you probably expect (or at least hope for) 3 or so more years of paces similar to what he has done in the past three years. After that a decline seems likely. So if you sign him to a hefty price for 6 years you probably get three years where he's worth what you give him or even a bargain and three years where he's not.
I feel like I'm OK with that gamble as the Pens since they will be tailing off in the last three years of a theoretical Rust contract anyways.
But of course it isn't in a vacuum either. In order of importance for signing our free agents, I'd still rate it: Letang-->Malkin--->Rust--->Erod in that order. So I'd prefer to get Letang and Malkin done before worrying about anyone else.
Rust might actually be a more valuable/offensively productive player than Malkin at this point in their careers, but Malkin is I think still more important even with that just because he's a center and we have nobody who can plug those minutes effectively. Carter ain't a 2c anymore. As for Letang, he's obviously the linchpin to our entire defense. Nobody can fill those minutes the way he can. If we lose him it will be devastating and may slam whatever remains of our window shut.
If the Pens didn't have an aging core, I wouldn't mind Carter. Cullen was here during our core's prime.
But a thought, a few weeks back the Pens took on the Kings, the team that Carter wanted to stay with, the team that decided it was time to move on. The Pens were beaten in every facet of the game, out worked, out hit, out chanced, out skated........ it was embarrassing.
You could say it was just a bad night for the B & G....... Not me, I hoped it would fire a warning shot to the FO that this team needed to get some energy on this roster and quick. They obviously saw it as a bad night.
Ovehckin is probably banking on the fact the Capitals would never trade him. Things would have to go down hill real fast for him in which case who's going to want him at that price? Or the team goes down hill real fast in which case, maybe he'd be fine with a trade? Forgoing the NMC probably got him some extra money and he effectively has a NMC anyway.
I'd say 3.125 mil per is a discount for Carter.
Counting the playoffs - where he was our best player - Carter's scored 25 goals and 42 points in 56 games as a Penguin. That's a 36 goals/62 points per 82 games pace. And he's 57% on faceoffs, best on the team.
Can’t believe they gave him an NFT