Why wouldn't our defense in the future not have Arber on LD?
We have needed a guy like Xhekaj for decades - no way in HELL we should consider trading him. I don't care what the return is.The thinking for some is that Arber is highly valued around the league. So, if we could trade him for a high return (say something similar to the Romanov-Dach deal) it might be the way to go, considering we have other good bottom pair d in the system. Even if Struble's overall package isn't as good as Xhekaj's, he still may be a high quality bottom pair damn - plus we also have Guhle, Matheson, Hutson, Engstrom, Harris, and Trudeau on the left side.
Now, for me the return for Xhekaj would have to be very high. We have a lot of small players. And Xhekaj hopefully is one piece to balance out those small players and allow the team to play big. If someone offers the next Dach, sure I take it.
And for the first time we can have the a bang Em up bro combo! Have you even thought about the children? Has anyone thought of the children!We have needed a guy like Xhekaj for decades - no way in HELL we should consider trading him. I don't care what the return is.
Well I get the point from people arguing they would trade Arber for a Dach like prospect (i.e Lafreniere or Byfield)Those who want to trade Arber should be sent to the gulag.
To each their own. Everybody has a price. If the next Dach is offered for Xhekaj, I do it.We have needed a guy like Xhekaj for decades - no way in HELL we should consider trading him. I don't care what the return is.
To each their own. Everybody has a price. If the next Dach is offered for Xhekaj, I do it.
Yes, that remains to be seen. Lucic was a good fighter and a great offensive player, and played in an era when fighting and size was more important. As soon as the rules changed, Lucic became ineffective.That’s fine but I wouldn’t do it. It would be like the Bruins trading away a young Lucic.
We have needed a guy like Xhekaj for decades - no way in HELL we should consider trading him. I don't care what the return is.
Same size as noted undersized defenseman Radko GudasHe's maybe one inch taller than Harris lol. Struble does not bring size to our defense. They are both undersized for NHL defenseman.
Yeah 6'0 and 205 is a pretty solid size for a Dman especially if you are stronger than a country ox.Same size as noted undersized defenseman Radko Gudas
Size lol?? He's barely 6ft tall. I would guess that's smaller than NHL average, maybe even smaller than defenseman average.
No offense, but fitness results from 4 years ago are not exactly compelling evidence that he has the current size and ability to handle the NHL. That said, Struble's size and physicality are about the last thing we need to worry about, I see zero reason for any concern.The 2019 NHL Draft Combine has just wrapped up in Buffalo. While neither Kaapo Kakko or Jack Hughes participated in the fitness testing, Jayden Struble finished at the top of almost every event.
2019 NHL Draft: Jayden Struble stands out at combine
The 2918 NHL Draft Combine has just wrapped up in Buffalo. While neither Kaapo Kakko or Jack Hughes participated in the fitness testing, Jayden Struble did.puckprose.com
Just look at him on the ice. He is an imposing figure. Some guys are more muscular than others and can pack more muscle on the same frame. Struble is a big guy, despite his size being average. He is imposing, which is what matters.Size lol?? He's barely 6ft tall. I would guess that's smaller than NHL average, maybe even smaller than defenseman average.
Recent one:No offense, but fitness results from 4 years ago are not exactly compelling evidence that he has the current size and ability to handle the NHL. That said, Struble's size and physicality are about the last thing we need to worry about, I see zero reason for any concern.
Size lol?? He's barely 6ft tall. I would guess that's smaller than NHL average, maybe even smaller than defenseman average.
To me Matheson is part of the future until someone shows they can supplant him and Mailloux is ahead of Kovacevic.Future is bright:
Guhle - Barron
Hutson - Reinbacher
Struble/Xhekaj - Kovacevic
Engstrom/Harris - Mailloux
Konyushkov - Trudeau
Go Struble Go!!
Yep this kid is exceeding all expectations of many. Habs have a plethora a stud D prospects. Maybe down the road some of these very prospects can help the organization trade for offensive players.Recent one:
Marc Denis : Jayden Struble est potentiellement le meilleur athlète de l’organisation du CH
Intéressant.www.danslescoulisses.com
That's my hope as well !Yep this kid is exceeding all expectations of many. Habs have a plethora a stud D prospects. Maybe down the road some of these very prospects can help the organization trade for offensive players.
Imposing lol. I'm sorry he doesn't look imposing to me at all. When I think of imposing I think of Shea Weber, Hedman, Carlo, Zadorov, Pronger...those types. Struble might a strong guy for his size, but he is not imposingJust look at him on the ice. He is an imposing figure. Some guys are more muscular than others and can pack more muscle on the same frame. Struble is a big guy, despite his size being average. He is imposing, which is what matters.
Hedman and Carlo aren't imposing in the same sense. They're soft as f***.Imposing lol. I'm sorry he doesn't look imposing to me at all. When I think of imposing I think of Shea Weber, Hedman, Carlo, Zadorov, Pronger...those types. Struble might a strong guy for his size, but he is not imposing
Bouillon also threw people around, he still wasn't an imposing defenseman. Hedman is an imposing defenseman any way you look at it.Hedman and Carlo aren't imposing in the same sense. They're soft as f***.
Struble will get confidence and he'll start throwing people around with his build.
Mark Giordano is 6', Roman Josi is 6'1, so was/is Duncan Keith. None are softies. There are countless others. Struble can and will be a player opponents do not want to skate by too closely!Yeah 6'0 and 205 is a pretty solid size for a Dman especially if you are stronger than a country ox.