Fourier
Registered User
Sorry, I should have given the reference. They are from Hockeyviz:What site .. these are familiar but i cant place
Sorry, I should have given the reference. They are from Hockeyviz:What site .. these are familiar but i cant place
I didn't say it is a bad move... but it is obvious that the Oilers try to please McDavid... from Foegele, Brown, Jackson and now to Knoblauch....In life, just because something happened over there, doesn't mean it will happen over here. You have to pivot, try new things, etc. Experienced coaches get recycled all of the time and suck too. If they were all sure things, they would be like teachers. Coach 30-40 years and then retire.
There is no set formula. Every team has different strengths and weaknesses.
So you think it is a bad move that the incoming coach KNOWS a bunch of players and how they play? Interesting.
Ahhh.. thank youSorry, I should have given the reference. They are from Hockeyviz:
You see enough of these over the year and wonder if the tide will ever turn. In my estimation we have simply built a team full of players who can not score goals, even if they're capable of getting to the correct areas of the ice to do so. It is not out of the realm of possibility that we've drafted and signed non goal scoring forwards who looked good via these metrics, in hopes that with enough time the goals would come.Oilers vs Vegas in pictures:
For me the Oilers record is a matter of too many big mistakes rather than poor overall defense, not enough saves and a lack of finish.
View attachment 767591
View attachment 767590
View attachment 767589
View attachment 767588
View attachment 767587
View attachment 767586
View attachment 767585
View attachment 767584
General consensus from oiler fans is that woody shouldn’t be fired?Venturing out of HF to see the general consensus on this decision. I thinks genral consensus from Oilers fans is that this was a dumb move and Woody didn’t deserve the firing.
When Oilers fan universally agree on something they are probably right. And management will look dumb in short order.
Except the best measure of a team's ability to score goals is how many goals they score. If you look back over the last two years where the core of the offense has been similar they are second in total goals scored.You see enough of these over the year and wonder if the tide will ever turn. In my estimation we have simply built a team full of players who can not score goals, even if they're capable of getting to the correct areas of the ice to do so. It is not out of the realm of possibility that we've drafted and signed non goal scoring forwards who looked good via these metrics, in hopes that with enough time the goals would come.
Well, they have not, and will not. It's not like we're talking about a team of Ovechkin's here just getting unlucky. This is years of people underperforming dramatically in relation to the 'chances' the metrics show they generate. At some point we must accept this is who we have. The strategy would be to get players who can put pucks in the net rather than get players who can direct pucks to the net.
I agree completely that our top guys are not scoring at the rate that is expected of them. However, would you agree last year was an anomaly in terms of goal production by our secondary, tertiary guys?Except the best measure of a team's ability to score goals is how many goals they score. If you look back over the last two years where the core of the offense has been similar they are second in total goals scored.
Now I agree that they have a limited number of shooters. But the offense is definitely underperforming. Some of thsi may well be an injury to McDavid. But odds are it improves. The question is will that be too little too late.
10?Been needing a goalie + top pairing Dman for 10yrs now.
Nurse+ Campbell is what Holland banked on.
Just like CFP covered up a lot of problems (Roloson did his part too) so too do McDavid and Draisatl.10?
Outside of a few months in 2006, they haven't had a top pairing D and goalie for over 30 years. I guess one can argue '16-'17 as well but that went to shit pretty quickly.
It's hard to say what is an anomaly with the secondary and tertiary guys. Nuge is very unlikely to score nearly as many as he did last year but Kane is also very likely to score more than he did last year. 53 goals between the two is not a big stretch by their normal standards.I agree completely that our top guys are not scoring at the rate that is expected of them. However, would you agree last year was an anomaly in terms of goal production by our secondary, tertiary guys?
Would enjoy seeing that chart for our bottom 6 players only as well.
I guess it goes to show how poorly this club is structured if the difference between us being in the basement or competing for the division hinges on two players going supernova. A damn shame it has ended up like this. Every club has to make concession in how they build, and it does seem that relying on an extreme high end to carry versus building a balanced group that acclimates better to players going through funks is risky. Although we didn't have much choice given we drafted both superstars.It's hard to say what is an anomaly with the secondary and tertiary guys. Nuge is very unlikely to score nearly as many as he did last year but Kane is also very likely to score more than he did last year. 53 goals between the two is not a big stretch by their normal standards.
Guys like Foegele, Ryan and McLeod were not that much more productive last year than in the year before. They scored 31 goals combined in 2021-22 and 37 last year. Kostin's 11 goals is not so easy to replace, but in the end the big difference so far is McDavid and Leon. Is this a short term slump or is it going to last. Both guys are capable of going on insane runs.
Yep, this is indefensible.This screams of desperation to keep McDavid in Edmonton by surrounding him with "his" people. The inmates are running the asylum.
What a f***ing joke. f*** this organization. They're just a bunch of f***ing clowns at this point.
I think it is more complicated than simply McDavid/Draisaitl.I guess it goes to show how poorly this club is structured if the difference between us being in the basement or competing for the division hinges on two players going supernova. A damn shame it has ended up like this. Every club has to make concession in how they build, and it does seem that relying on an extreme high end to carry versus building a balanced group that acclimates better to players going through funks is risky. Although we didn't have much choice given we drafted both superstars.
It sounds crazy to even contemplate what the team would look like without one of McDavid or Draisaitl, but at this point I'm willing to entertain it.
Until Katz goes nothing will truly change. We thought it couldn't be worse than Chiarelli... We were wrong.10 coaches in 10 years. Nothing has changed with management. every gm comes in and never fixes the defence, goaltending and depth scoring, fires the coach instead of taking the blame rinse repeat.
Not every coach has obviously been good but woodcroft was a great coach. Yes he is partially to blame for the slow start but we all know the majority falls on Holland. And this new guy might help short term but isn’t going to be a long term success until the team gets a gm who can finally fix the weaknesses. and yes there’s a lot of them. The more things change, the more things stay the same.
You keep focusing on these random small samples. Whether it's this or Campbell you're always taking the smallest possible sample size.
You don't think Woodcroft had at least something to do with McDavid going supernova? Because Dave Tippett sure never unlocked that level of play for him.
The Oilers fans of the day were jerks and got on any player. So much so that Grant Fuhr famously gave the home jeering fans the finger. Sather had to help several of the players deal with the inordinate and critical demands of the fans. He also had to speak to the media often to lay off his players.Gifted offensive player but certainly not a tough or hard working defenseman. Even during the glory days the Oiler fans got on him with "dont-coff-up the puck"
You should be at least awarded an Ass't Coach job!There is no smoke. That mofo is electric.
No the bolded was true. Mostly in his inaugural years. But like anyone he matured. Of course he wasn't anything near the stay at home shut down defenceman type, but he played the position to his strengths. And incredibly so. Pretty hard to argue that he couldn't play defense when he had the puck all the time. Also as you say - being the most beautiful skater in the game - he got back fast when mistakes were made.The Oilers fans of the day were jerks and got on any player. So much so that Grant Fuhr famously gave the home jeering fans the finger. Sather had to help several of the players deal with the inordinate and critical demands of the fans. He also had to speak to the media often to lay off his players.
Coffey was the hardest working player on the ice, covered the most miles, could do anything, and was tough enough.
Never heard the bolded and its silly anyway because in a risk/reward analysis Coffey was making great decisions out there. But when you produce to the degree he did theres going to be the occasional plays that go the other way.
General consensus from oiler fans is that woody shouldn’t be fired?
You not paying attention lately?
Nice. You talked to all the fans or just a specific few.
I don’t think you know what consensus meansLooks like it. There’s a lot of support for Woody and lots that say he shouldn’t have been fired. Me included.
Just Twitter and Reddit along with here to get an idea. Is that not possible?