MG: The NHL now is built on you’re successful for 2-3 years and then you’re not very good for 10 years. There’s got to be a way to break out of that cycle using technology and advanced thinking and advanced decision making.
CC: You don’t think that cycle has to exist in a cap system?
MG: I don’t think it has to exist that way. If you’re constantly getting the best you can out of every player, you will go through downturns but they don’t have to be downturns that exist for five, six, seven, eight years or longer in some cases. When you see teams that select in the top five players or six players for years and years in a row and don’t seem to make any advancement, there’s something else wrong.
Everyone identifies who the top 10 players are, it may change. There may be four great players and six really good players coming out of every draft. If you’re consistently picking in the top eight or 10 and not changing your result at all over an extended period of time, clearly there’s something else wrong. They may not be as good as you actually hope them to be, but if the environment is correct, they’re going to be the best they can be. So I think, yeah, there are ways to avoid it. It requires real commitment and alignment throughout the organization to put those processes and environment in place.