Jason Botterill Discussion 3

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.
Status
Not open for further replies.

SabresFan26

Registered User
May 28, 2003
10,837
2,377
Visit site
Unfortunately, outside of the Skinner trade, Botts hasn't been able to make any savvy trades to acquire solid depth in areas of need during the offseason. Sheary is the closest one, and he didnt pay cheap to get him.

So while I'm not going to jump off the ledge after every depth trade- each one will further my belief that Botts just isnt competent at his job.

I dont hate blindly. I'm a huge fan of Beane, but Botts has a lot of proving to do before I give him the benefit of the doubt.
This is fair. I'd argue getting Montour is another good trade. The ROR will look better in 2-3 years which was what the trade was intended for. Like I've said in other threads, Botts deserves 4-5 years to right the ship and in year 3 (this year) progress needs to begin to show. His vision is different than the past GMs. This summer/off season will really define Botterill's tenure with the team we ice this upcoming season.
 

Sabresfansince1980

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 29, 2011
11,192
5,736
from Wheatfield, NY
"The Assistant GM brought his former team's scouting department work with him to his new job"

I love the depths to which some will go to invent narratives.

And your narrative is that Botterill would not take notes from any scouting meetings with his old team, or forget anything he learned from them.

Not sure I’m following this conversation topic but in Friedmann’s 31 thoughts podcast this week he talks about new GMs having “two lists” - one from their old team, one from their new. They were particularly curious which list Yzerman pulled Seider from.

With Botterill being an AGM and ostensibly not heavily involved in the draft when he was with the pens, I’m not sure he’d have had a list to bring over with him, but it does apparently happen with GMs.

AGMs would be in most scouting or draft meetings just like the GM.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
155,337
109,199
Tarnation
Not sure I’m following this conversation topic but in Friedmann’s 31 thoughts podcast this week he talks about new GMs having “two lists” - one from their old team, one from their new. They were particularly curious which list Yzerman pulled Seider from.

With Botterill being an AGM and ostensibly not heavily involved in the draft when he was with the pens, I’m not sure he’d have had a list to bring over with him, but it does apparently happen with GMs.

It's carry-over from Jame and Joshjull debating the Laaksonen selection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doug Prishpreed

OkimLom

Registered User
May 3, 2010
15,571
7,018
Unfortunately, outside of the Skinner trade, Botts hasn't been able to make any savvy trades to acquire solid depth in areas of need during the offseason. Sheary is the closest one, and he didnt pay cheap to get him.

So while I'm not going to jump off the ledge after every depth trade- each one will further my belief that Botts just isnt competent at his job.

I dont hate blindly. I'm a huge fan of Beane, but Botts has a lot of proving to do before I give him the benefit of the doubt.

I tend to agree with this assessment. Trust me, Botts has a lot of work to do for me to view him favorably, but nobody knows, except those parties involved in the trade negotiations, whether Botts is trying to get a player that was moved or not. I think it's reasonable to believe Botts could've been trying to get the player, but the asking price was too high, whether one piece, or overall. It's also reasonable to believe he wasn't involved in that player that was moved because he doesn't fit or doesn't want him for whatever reason.

Would one be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, or give him kudos for not overpaying for a depth player, while at the same time complaining about Botts not trading for a player, because with the amount of confirmed factual information we have as a fanbase as parties not involved, we should be able to.

There's enough to hate about Botterill, if one has that opinion of him, why waste the energy and time hating on a guy for something you, yourself are not 100% sure he was a part of? At least let your hate build up for when he actually does something you don't like :DD;)
 

Deleted member 27798

Guest
By my count 17 teams have made trades since the last week of the cup final involving players not just pick for pick deals. Those trades have involved by my count 28 players and 15 draft picks with one case of future considerations. Of those players one was a buyout. Several teams have made multiple moves. I didn’t count all of the trades by total just looking at who was involved.
I must have missed a few. I scrolled through the trade forum from the last few weeks looking at the thread titles with the prefix "Confirmed Trade".

That being said, I stand by my point...there is a LOT of off-season to go. If the next 3-4 weeks go by, and there are not at least 4-5 new Sabres acquired via F/A or trade, I to will start to worry. Especially if said players don't address the teams biggest weaknesses...2C, a top 6 winger, a couple of bottom 6 forwards, and a defenseman...depending on what they do with Risto or any of the other current blueliners under contract.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
155,337
109,199
Tarnation
I must have missed a few. I scrolled through the trade forum from the last few weeks looking at the thread titles with the prefix "Confirmed Trade".

That being said, I stand by my point...there is a LOT of off-season to go. If the next 3-4 weeks go by, and there are not at least 4-5 new Sabres acquired via F/A or trade, I to will start to worry. Especially if said players don't address the teams biggest weaknesses...2C, a top 6 winger, a couple of bottom 6 forwards, and a defenseman...depending on what they do with Risto or any of the other current blueliners under contract.

Most roster building historically is done by the end of the first week in July.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tsujimoto74

Dubi Doo

Registered User
Aug 27, 2008
20,202
14,060
I tend to agree with this assessment. Trust me, Botts has a lot of work to do for me to view him favorably, but nobody knows, except those parties involved in the trade negotiations, whether Botts is trying to get a player that was moved or not. I think it's reasonable to believe Botts could've been trying to get the player, but the asking price was too high, whether one piece, or overall. It's also reasonable to believe he wasn't involved in that player that was moved because he doesn't fit or doesn't want him for whatever reason.

Would one be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, or give him kudos for not overpaying for a depth player, while at the same time complaining about Botts not trading for a player, because with the amount of confirmed factual information we have as a fanbase as parties not involved, we should be able to.

There's enough to hate about Botterill, if one has that opinion of him, why waste the energy and time hating on a guy for something you, yourself are not 100% sure he was a part of? At least let your hate build up for when he actually does something you don't like :DD;)
Botts has turned me into Darth Vader. He's my Emperor. Feel the hate run through you veinssss!
 

OkimLom

Registered User
May 3, 2010
15,571
7,018
Botts has turned me into Darth Vader. He's my Emperor. Feel the hate run through you veinssss!

This man turned you into Darth Vader???

bytXZIF.png
 

brian_griffin

"Eric Cartman?"
May 10, 2007
16,782
8,036
In the Panderverse
Here's the thing about geniuses: most don't ever amount to jack ****. They just lounge around the park, playing speed chess, and spend all night wondering why the "idiots" around them are so much richer and successful than they are.
Speak for yourself, I know exactly why I'm not rich and successful. ;)

But the problem is that de facto he was because our centers outside of Jack were Mount Trashmore and Casey was viewed as one of our very few talented or skilled players. Also when it was clear he wasn't ready we really couldn't do anything because our depth was so pitiful there wasn't really anyone we had who could replace him.
Love that phrase. Circa mid-late 1970's, hockey cards had "bonus cards" highlighting some of the NHL's best lines. There was one for the "French Connection", one for the "Long Island Lighting Company", etc. 2019 Sabres have a "Mount Trashmore" card.

I think that's like saying someone is a better MLS player than Andrew Shue.
Deep vintage reference, and I wasn't a 90210 watcher. Respect!!!

Jame your response a few pages ago plainly illustrates you can't be rational when discussing Botterill. You're a great part of this community but for whatever reason it seems you can't think or act with reason all things Botterill.

Murray made far more bad moves than Botterill. You keep regurgitating the one bad move he did make... And as pointed out elsewhere there were circumstances which made the outcome of that trade absolutely as bad as possible. Circumstances outside Botterill's control... Hell I don't even trust that it was all on Botterill making the move to begin with....

You need to give him time. If he bungles a potential Risto trade, messes up the 7ov selection & it turns out his boy Krueger is a total failure - then we can sit here next summer & all be closer to agreement.

You give a GM a job even if he is terrible the least you owe that guy as an owner is time. But there has been enough good stuff to suggest that Botterill might not be terrible.
Good post. If - and I agree with you - Pegulas pushed the Housley hire as part of their Alumni nepotism plan, and pushed the ROR trade as part of their 1920s Prohibition-era Buffalo plan, then Botterill should have laid down in the road and refused to do it, and risk being fired.

Buffalo media....killin' it again.
Killing what's already dead...
images

How many chances does this dopey mfer get? He’s so so bad at this job.
Will suggest this to my wife as a possible nickname for one of our work colleagues. Thanks!!

I hope they're winning and have a successful season. Maybe I'm different as a fan of the team. What color are your pajamas?
I have a pair of bottoms - navy blue with gold / white window pane pattern that I've deemed my Sabres pjs. Have a short sleeve classic-logo-on-navy top I wear with them.

The problem is that because of all the negative factors surrounding our organization we will end up paying Manhattan prices for Staten Island real estate. I'm just scared that we end up with land by Fresh Kills instead of by Wagner College.
I've been to Wagner. Nice reference.

Trades are zero sum moves. You give from area of strength to address an area of weakness. You build areas of strength through the draft. Currently we have no area of strength due to this arse hat. To address our weakness, scoring, we will open a hole somewhere else. Bottom five finish, rinse repeat. Presented with the opportunity in three consecutive drafts to add scoring forwards he has either drafted obscure d men, goalies or in the laugher traded a pick for a later pick the following year in the same round. He is a spineless tool of the Pegulas. He should have walked when they wanted he who should not be named moved. He would have at least been employable going forward. Now he just fiddles about like he has a clue and no one question hims. Where were the Pegulas demanding answers when he regressed two consecutive years like they did Murray after one? The whole organization, PSE that is, is mired in the incompetence and hubris of two charlatans who operate for the value of their own personal brand in a market that is too scared to complain or better, refuse to consume the product. If they tried their bull**** in Boston, Chicago, LA, or NY they would have their teams play to empty buildings. Everyone wants to praise him for the luck of Dahlin and Skinner when everyone of his conscience moves have been shyte.

Not a personal attack, far from from it. Just an opposing point of view. UFA and trades aren’t going to do anything but put bailing wire and duct tape on this team.
The bolded is not true when negotiating with the 20-25% of the league which is ham-stringed by the Cap each offseason. Other teams absolutely have leverage against cap-constrained teams.

But, we have to win now...
Some Sabres progress now might at least shorten the gap the better Eastern teams are widening on Buffalo. If Botts is expecting organic roster improvement and a developed prospect or two each season putting the Sabres over the playoff bubble hump, he'll be waiting a good 5 years (10 players) before the Sabres sniff the playoffs.

looking ahead it looks like Buffalo top 9 looks like:

Skinner-Eichel-xxx
xxx-Mitts-Reinhart
xxx-Cozens-xxx

Nylander, Olofsson would be in that top 9. They have space for one more player to protect in ED

If they target a Center they only want one for 2-3 years.
You really think Cozens starts in the NHL???? Serious question.

Bad GMs win the cup all the time. Look at Rutherford in Pittsburgh. He did some dumb **** on paper but it worked itself out. And the longer he's been there, the worse its gotten. They might not make the playoffs next year if they have any sort of injury issues. Or Chiarelli won a cup in Boston.

Sometimes blind luck is more important that a base level of competence.
Buffalo has neither...

Bobblehead is just a symptom. The Pegs were outraged at Kane for peeing in the punchbowl at their draft party. ROR pissed them off with his comments. So they want character now. These same folks have no problem raising ticket prices, and pressuring SLG for a new stadium when the team finishes dfl 3 out of 5 years. A Christmas party takes a wrong turn and the Harborcenter staff is **** canned, probably correctly. Make the stupidest trade in the Last 20 years and its business as usual because in the end they can blame it on the gm, send a letter to sths and their personal brand remains intact. Any competent FO guy is gonna politely decline any association with these clowns and the media will continue fawn over the saviours of sports in wny. I swore off the Bills when the hired Ryan and haven’t looked back. The Sabres are a tougher habit to kick. But I may need to for my sanity.
Did the bolded really happen? Serious question.

When Jed Clampett accidentally razed up bubbling crude while shooting at some food, he became a billionaire. He became wealthy by accident, not business acumen. When Terry Pegula "hit" on fracking, was it because he was a self-made business genius, or was it due to sufficient working capital meeting someone else's business plan?

Jason Botterill is so over his head, GM's do rock, paper scissors to get dibs on trading with him first. Phil Housley was not a head coach and never was he going to be. Ryan O'Reilly made an honest, understandable comment after another horrible season because he likes to win. He gets upset when that doesn't happen. OMG, how terrible...get him out of the locker room. Sure. Despite his Conn Smythe, Stanley Cup leading talent, Botts trades him for [NOTHING], even taking two retreads with bad contracts...at the time he traded ROR, Botts was convinced that no one wanted him, his leverage was nonexistent and Doug Armstrong acted like he was doing us a favor. Great way to negotiate big returns.

I'm tired Terry. Get your act together would you please. Hire the right people. Act like the brilliant business magnate, not the ignorant mountain man. And please, Kim is just not a team president [x-2] unless I missed something in her CV. Botts is now the subject of pity from his peers. You (and Kim) are the butt of jokes and ridicule. Having fun yet? We're not. Keep this up and we will all know that you are the accidental billionaire without the slightest clue how to build a winning NHL team.
WELCOME new poster !!!!

Problem is, players are selling cheap due to cap constraints. Botts should be looking to make deals during the entire offseason. If not, he's ain't doing his job.
Wholly agree!!

This is fair. I'd argue getting Montour is another good trade. The ROR will look better in 2-3 years which was what the trade was intended for. Like I've said in other threads, Botts deserves 4-5 years to right the ship and in year 3 (this year) progress needs to begin to show. His vision is different than the past GMs. This summer/off season will really define Botterill's tenure with the team we ice this upcoming season.
What is your logic for both of those assertions? Do you believe the assets coming back from the ROR trade will provide more Sabres roster impact 2-3 years out than ROR will have on STL or whatever team he is on in 2-3 years? I do not.
Why was the ROR trade intended for 2-3 years from last July 1? If you claim cap space (which was readily debunked numerous times on this board), why wouldn't you at a minimum hold ROR in BUF for a couple years to both benefit from his play and allow replacements to develop on a team / league they more rightly belong? Admittedly I may be biased, but I don't see any logic for the bolded.
 

Jame

Registered User
Sep 4, 2002
52,673
9,037
Florida
This is fair. I'd argue getting Montour is another good trade. The ROR will look better in 2-3 years which was what the trade was intended for. Like I've said in other threads, Botts deserves 4-5 years to right the ship and in year 3 (this year) progress needs to begin to show. His vision is different than the past GMs. This summer/off season will really define Botterill's tenure with the team we ice this upcoming season.

Aye Aye Captain
 

brian_griffin

"Eric Cartman?"
May 10, 2007
16,782
8,036
In the Panderverse
^ This guy Quotes
Just catching up on this thread. Been out of town for a week. Visited friends in Kitchener, then cousins in BUF, then work the past few days in finger lakes area. My 416/716/607 trip is concluded.
More combined work / vacation travel coming up each & every month the rest of the year. Problem is, I have 3 weeks of as-yet-unplanned vacation on top of that, and am too busy to block a whole week to take off. I might just do Fridays off the rest of the year instead.
 

Myllz

RELEASE THE KRAKEN
Jan 16, 2006
19,621
1,424
Vegas
When you acquire a 1st, 2nd and a top 6 forward prospect, you’re not expecting to be better then, you’re planning for 3-5 years down the line.

Let's say they hit on all 3 of those things, which is unlikely in the first place. You think the sum of those parts is greater than a Selke top line center? I don't.
 

sufferer

Registered User
Dec 6, 2017
3,731
4,474
Let's say they hit on all 3 of those things, which is unlikely in the first place. You think the sum of those parts is greater than a Selke top line center? I don't.
But those pieces potentially being on the whole or in part better than O'Reilly 5+ years from now is more important than what O'Reilly could've brought to this team during the remainder of his contract... o_O
 
Last edited:

Myllz

RELEASE THE KRAKEN
Jan 16, 2006
19,621
1,424
Vegas
But those pieces potentially being on the whole or in part better than O'Reilly 5+ years from now is more important than what O'Reilly could've brought to this team during the remainder of his contract... o_O

Is that sarcasm? It's getting hard to tell around here sometimes. :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim Bob

brian_griffin

"Eric Cartman?"
May 10, 2007
16,782
8,036
In the Panderverse
When you acquire a 1st, 2nd and a top 6 forward prospect, you’re not expecting to be better then, you’re planning for 3-5 years down the line.
So, assuming the playoff window opens in '21-23.

Unless traded:
  • 4 forwards signed/will be signed for '20-21 season: 9, 23, 37, 53 (& also Okposo as "filler")
  • 2 defensemen signed for '20-21 season: 26, 55 & possibly #19, #62.
  • Maybe Gus, Larry and ERod will be around (2 year deals this offseason would have them on a 2021 playoff roster).
So I guess we're then hoping to get NHL-competent contributions from maybe half of the 7 ELC forwards currently under contract, and 1 or 2 of the ELC defensemen. Maybe a player or two not yet signed will contribute as well.
Or that youth will be traded for equivalent talent. (Hopefully older talent, because the average age of the Sabres roster in '21 playoffs will be ~24yo.)

Color me underwhelmed with theory Botts set a plan on 7/1/18 for the Sabres playoff window to begin to open in 2021. We've heard that story before with the cow and the magic beans...
 
Last edited:

CatsforReinhart

Registered User
Jul 27, 2014
7,315
1,623
Frankfurt
Serious question,

What is Botts plan?

Build a stable of defencemen? Doing that
Build through the draft? Tough to do quickly.

Other than that I don't see his plan, his short term plan or a long term plan for success.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad