I look at his drafting patterns as well in his ability to draft long term sustainability. Aside, from the ROR trade which is a glaring black hole of bad, he's done a fairly decent job. I will admit when you give up a player who just won the Selke it is hard to garner much credibility. However, I look at Sheary being a worthy gamble at the time (minus Hunwick), his trade for Skinner and ultimate re-signing (which was a must), the Montour trade, which in essence has given the Sabres a secondary puck carrier we haven't had since the days of Campbell, Lydman etc. Yes, the Berglund, Sobotka additions are just that, major flaws. However, at this point he's done a decent job drafting, and Rochester is coming off back to back playoff runs. Whether, that's the biggest push we've seen, I still look the OVERALL body of work. He's been patient enough to not blow everything up for the sake of "him taking over a mess".
I was talking about this idea about two-way ability being attribute of a player, not necessarily his work as a GM. But I could provide my opinion on that.
He's done okay at bringing in talent, but team construction he leaves a lot desired. The Skinner trade was a horrible trade until he re-signed in terms of asset management. I'm of the opinion that he did a terrible job at getting a team friendly deal and paid market value at a time where we need to be more frugal considering how many holes and roles we need to improve upon. But you can't hate getting a goal scorer signed long term. Montour, is a decent upgrade offensively over Risto's role on the offensive side of the puck, but doesn't move the needle defensively. He's just as bad as Risto. Sheary's role in the organization was already filled with Pominville here. He double-downed on that, all the while gaining a reliable goal scorer for your top 6. He didn't make it easier for Mittelstadt at any point. He is terrible defensively or offensively considering his usage. The Hunwick add-on was unnecessary.
I liked the moves him and Sexton made in Rochester, but it will be interesting to see what he has in store to replace a lot of the major roles. I liked the Pilut signing which carried over to the main roster, until Phil and the coaching staff up here was able to "teach" him things. Then it was downhill from there.
His overall body of work as a General Manager handling the duties and decisions he has to make, is not that great. His decision making on certain guys' readiness is very very questionable. His VERY 1st draft pick he made, IMO, a terrible call at signing him so soon after an average freshman year at UM. His numbers were decent, and his World Juniors he performed well, but his season in the context of learning habits and learning the game to becoming a professional hockey player was not good. He had a lot of holes in his game that needed more conditioning, and it was very apparent he needed to take his offseason workouts seriously (needed to mature) as he came in camp what looked to be slow and out of shape.
His drafting overall is promising at best, and that's it at this point. It's way too soon to determine how well or bad he did after two years, but I can honestly say, right now, his 1st year, when he barely had time to create a gameplan for scouting and determining what type of players he wants, using Murray's guys, was a lot more likable than his 2nd year, which scares me, as I believe his 2nd year should've been way better than his 1st when he can bring in HIS guys.