Yeah, it was less than what I wanted to hear. There are lots of reasons he might be limited in his answers right now; being careful because management is slow to accept the necessity, only talking about what he knows can be applied to hockey from soccer, being vague because he's more comfortable letting actually knowledgeable people handle analytics.Anyone else find it weird that both times Krueger was asked about analytics he really only emphasized it in terms of injuries and man-games-lost?
My understanding is a "data race" occurs when two or more threads in a single process access the same memory location concurrently, and at least one of the accesses is for writing, and the threads are not using any exclusive locks to control their accesses to that memory.
A data race should not be confused with a race condition which is an error that occurs when a device or system attempts to perform two or more operations at the same time, but because of the nature of the device or system, the operations must be done in the proper sequence to be done correctly.
Many data races are due to race conditions. Many race conditions are due to data races.
Here at HFBoards our programmers work diligently to avoid data races and race conditions.
Yeah, it was less than what I wanted to hear. There are lots of reasons he might be limited in his answers right now; being careful because management is slow to accept the necessity, only talking about what he knows can be applied to hockey from soccer, being vague because he's more comfortable letting actually knowledgeable people handle analytics.
Many teams are investing in their analytics department, meanwhile Buffalo is slow to invest in that area. Where other teams have multiple workers in this area, I believe Buffalo only has one guy handling this department.
When you factor in Terry being all about providing the team the resources it needs to succeed (see re-designed locker room for example), not investing in this area, which could give you more information to be competitive with, is baffling. It would be understandable if we were still under the Golisano ownership and the penny-pinching, but we're not. Add in the fact of Terry wanting to be ahead of the curve or doing things differently, not having a grasp on this area, where it would actually help you and your coaching be competitive, is inexcusable.
Pretty muchHeck, he's almost as old as I am. Analytics? How do you spell that? Does this mean I need to be able to work a computer? Can I hire someone to do all of that for me?
Glad to see Gretz describe it as a make or break season for Botterill personally because that's what it should be. Anything short of major improvement and he has to be shown the door. 3 years is plenty.
Yeah, it was less than what I wanted to hear. There are lots of reasons he might be limited in his answers right now; being careful because management is slow to accept the necessity, only talking about what he knows can be applied to hockey from soccer, being vague because he's more comfortable letting actually knowledgeable people handle analytics.
If he trade Risto for help in the top 6, will it really be a hole? Just the game Risto all this time was so terrible that it seems to me that Nelson and Borgen will play no worse than he.
We have Montour for the top 4, you can try Nelson and Borgen in the third pair, sign Stralman or trade for Colin Miller, and trade Risto for help with the top 6.Remember when Risto got injured last season and our other RHD had to play increased and more difficult minutes to cover the gap and they were complete trainwrecks? I do. Risto is certainly not a guy you want playing the minutes he has the last several seasons, but he's comfortably much better than any of our other current options.
We have Montour for the top 4, you can try Nelson and Borgen in the third pair, sign Stralman or trade for Colin Miller, and trade Risto for help with the top 6.
Well, for me it is obvious that Montour is better than Risto. Of course, he is a player of another plan, I just really got tired of looking at this shame Ristolainen in defense. By the way, Colin Miller is also better than Risto in many aspects and statistics.Montour in Risto’s use was said train wreck.
Miller got benched in the playoffs and he hadn’t been the most consistent player which lends itself to his potential availability again.
Well, for me it is obvious that Montour is better than Risto. Of course, he is a player of another plan, I just really got tired of looking at this shame Ristolainen in defense. By the way, Colin Miller is also better than Risto in many aspects and statistics.
Phil's system is generally incomprehensible that almost no one was good there. I understand that Montour is not that reliable guy in his zone, but he is a pretty decent two-sided back and I like the way he connects to the attack. Unfortunately, I can’t say this about Risto, so I don’t mind trading with him to help in top 6. I look at it in such a way that almost any trainee defender can play in the trainer's system and play well, especially in the example of Trotz in the Islanders, After all, have them there are almost no some stellar guys in the defense, but however they were reliable, but without a good second link, it would be very difficult to oppose something to competitors.Eh, Montour as used as Risto was used in Phil’s *ahem* system was not good. He wasn’t a good defender in Anaheim either.
And being better than Risto in metrics isn’t the best baseline. Being good vs NHL average would interest me more.
Awards update: Botterill didn’t win or get any votes.
If you're a billionaire with an openly professed love of the sport, how does your team go from middling playoff contender, to perennial joke under this clown.