was that hextall?Um. Like 5 foundational players went after Patrick.
was that hextall?Um. Like 5 foundational players went after Patrick.
That may be true but you can't deny the game Tanev-McCann-Kapanen just had. McCann should continue to center that line into the next couple of games.
It's more like this...I watch a great game and then read these:
And wonder what the F game some people watched...
3rd pairing dman making 3rd pairing money playing well on the 3rd pairing. Shocking!
He being Jake or Malkin or both.
I like what I see out of Matheson, I thought it was absolutely ridiculous that people wanted to write him off after 2 games, the 2nd of which he got hurt. Game 1, he looked like a new player learning a new system that most of the players also didn't even understand. The 2nd game he looked 100x better and then got hurt. But that speed and fit is seamless right now and I still think his offensive side will slowly come when he gets comfortable at the defensive side of his game. He's still a new player getting used to a new defensive partner and a system that still has no clue how to really work but I like what he's done so far.I don't watch all the other teams (this should be no shock for my posts which show a shocking disregard for the intricacies of Florida or Vancouver or Detroit or whatever).
But I have watched a lot of Boston. And man, I wanted Krug.
I felt our D-men were missing a skating & skill element. Another Letang, but worse defensively (because you'd never be able to get another offensive D as skilled as Letang at his level defensively). So yeah, I knew Krug would be a FA at some point and I hoped we'd position ourselves to get him.
That crazy coot JR went and did it with Matheson. Even more skilled offensively. Slightly lower offensive IQ. Who even knows about the defense. Certainly who knows about the defense in the playoffs.
But I am SWALLOWING crow through the @Honour Over Glory hole right now on Matheson. I just love watching him play. From game...4 he has been a pleasure to watch on the ice.
I'll admit they had a strong game and I hope they continue to do so, but I wouldn't hold my breath. I think Kappy is carrying most of the load there tbh. @DocEmrickSkitters suggested Teddy center Malkin when Sid comes back. That could mean leaving Tanev-McCann-Kapenen to be a potentially formidable 3rd line.
was that hextall?
I think you've got me mixed up with someone else.
Right now I wouldn't have Teddy center Malkin, no. I've probably suggested it be tried other times. I think if/when you move Malkin to the wing you need a true top-6 C there.
Also since his brilliant game not that long ago Teddy has kinda been butt.
The thing is, GMR is Sullivan's doing, or maybe it was someone else's that is gone and he refuses to use it because it wasn't his idea, I know a ton of people like that, that need to somehow make it their idea and then they utilize it.You just know Sully is smug about it. How he somehow had intuition to get GMR together. Should of been a line since day 1.
Blueger got shafted why? I don't get it...putting him with ZAR/Lafferty. Somehow he got WORSE linemates when Sid went out. It's almost comical.
I know coaching is difficult BUT I am fully confident that many of us could construct more effective lines. It's not rocket science.
I like what I see out of Matheson, I thought it was absolutely ridiculous that people wanted to write him off after 2 games, the 2nd of which he got hurt. Game 1, he looked like a new player learning a new system that most of the players also didn't even understand. The 2nd game he looked 100x better and then got hurt. But that speed and fit is seamless right now and I still think his offensive side will slowly come when he gets comfortable at the defensive side of his game. He's still a new player getting used to a new defensive partner and a system that still has no clue how to really work but I like what he's done so far.
You're starting to see him take more offensive risks that look like they could pay off if the forwards knew what to do with any positive momentum at times. It's early, but it looks good right now.
I like Matheson but the dude seems to be on the ice for every goal still
What did you drank tonight homie?
I was mostly joking doing it right now. It was more of a future idea when Malkin can't play the strong defensive game he usually was able to and is showing signs of it right now. But if you keep GMR together, it's not a worry.I think you've got me mixed up with someone else.
Right now I wouldn't have Teddy center Malkin, no. I've probably suggested it be tried other times. I think if/when you move Malkin to the wing you need a true top-6 C there.
Also since his brilliant game not that long ago Teddy has kinda been butt.
Started off with that craft mead, graduated to some taste of the rockies in some coor laght. You had that sangria right or am i trippin again
Yeah, Teddy the last couple struggled a bit. I would have left Tanev with him as well. Although McCann has been pretty decent since coming back.I was mostly joking doing it right now. It was more of a future idea when Malkin can't play the strong defensive game he usually was able to and is showing signs of it right now. But if you keep GMR together, it's not a worry.
When you split GMR, it is.
I'll leave it at that.
Edit: Not a brilliant game, Teddy was brilliant for literally all of the games except the last 2-3. Essentially, when ZAR came back...that line started to look off after ZAR's 1 great game offensively. But to split Blueger & Tanev was a weird take, something that shouldn't have happened at all imo. Blueger gave Sullivan more than enough to earn the trust of being with Tanev & Kapanen while Sid is out. But he again, wants to force feed McCann as some top 6 option during injuries.
Yeah the one thing I like about Matheson-Marino and I mentioned this before while Marino was struggling, was to keep Marino on the defensive side of things where he is a stud and comfortable and allow the offensive side to come back out when he's comfortable on his strong skills first. He was very inconsistent and has started to get back to being the stud young defender we were all raving about the last couple of games.He epitomizes the saying that the Best Defense is a Good Offense. He is going to, at times, look absolutely out to lunch on the defensive side of things.
But if he gets the puck on his stick, it is getting out of our zone and with a much higher chance of a controlled entry leading to a chance or sustained possession in the other zone. Much higher than if Dumo or Petts or POJ or certainly JJ was the one with the puck on his stick.
We'll see if it holds in the playoffs if we make it there. But he has earned the right to try it.
Plus as a fan it's good to have a few players who are just beautiful to watch on the ice.
The issue with McCann is that they keep going back and forth with him. There's no potential future for McCann anymore, they've turned him into what he's been for the team and he won't be any more than that at this point. He's a part time C and W and lives in the middle of that.Yeah, Teddy the last couple struggled a bit. I would have left Tanev with him as well. Although McCann was pretty decent since coming back.
Are we shocked?Every question is about Sid.
I was mostly joking doing it right now. It was more of a future idea when Malkin can't play the strong defensive game he usually was able to and is showing signs of it right now. But if you keep GMR together, it's not a worry.
When you split GMR, it is.
I'll leave it at that.
Edit: Not a brilliant game, Teddy was brilliant for literally all of the games except the last 2-3. Essentially, when ZAR came back...that line started to look off after ZAR's 1 great game offensively. But to split Blueger & Tanev was a weird take, something that shouldn't have happened at all imo. Blueger gave Sullivan more than enough to earn the trust of being with Tanev & Kapanen while Sid is out. But he again, wants to force feed McCann as some top 6 option during injuries.