Yeah that seems a little light unless Turcotte can stay healthy.
I suppose that risk kind of offsets Chychruns durabilty concerns though.
Are you saying that was not a good trade for the Kings?! One of the best deadline trades I can think of. The subsequent contract extension didn’t work out past season 1, but the Kings don’t win the 2014 Cup without Gaborik and he only cost them two 2nd round picks.If he plays 70 plus games a year he will achieved more than Chychrun has in his. This is what worries me about dealing for him. His average just over 55 games a year, thats not good. You can't justify giving up top assets for something like that. Its like trading for Gaborik, you know he'll miss 20 games a year. The Kings already did this.
Are you saying that was not a good trade for the Kings?! One of the best deadline trades I can think of. The subsequent contract extension didn’t work out past season 1, but the Kings don’t win the 2014 Cup without Gaborik and he only cost them two 2nd round picks.
Ps - the other thread got locked, Could not find one, so I just made a new one.
Cheers
I'll take that bet, Clarke can't skate and he moves in slow-mo.Clarke is going to be better than Chychrun ever was in no more than 2-3 years.
If LA deals Clarke, Blake should be fired.
Kupari is progressing just fine. Turcotte has been dealing with injuries, as has Thomas. Grans is in his sophomore slump. Bjornfot has regressed but others think he’s fine just blocked by vets. I’m not huge on Byfield but he’s had injuries and illness delay him but is starting to come on.I think it's a bit weird to flex on Vilardi being good (which he is) as being proof that fans on here are wrong about the Kings, while not mentioning that guys like Kupari, Turcotte, Bjornfot and Byfield haven't really shown the kind of progression you'd want out of where they were taken.
Just looking as an outsider, I think LA's drafting and developing recently has been more misses than hits. Anderson, Vilardi, Kaliyev, and Spence seem to be the most promising, but Kupari, Turcotte, Bjornfot, Byfield, Thomas (I remember he was super hyped back in the day) and Grans really don't appear to be progressing/didn't end up progressing as you wanted them to.
Sure, but Chychrun is not a rental, he has two more years on his deal at a super low cap hit.He's saying that at this time the Kings are not ready for a 'finishing piece.'
Kings blow their wad on Chychrun and they still have holes/issues to solve
TOR/BOS do it and they're certain favorites
The bigger issue was people quoting Freidmans speculation as fact for click bait. He made it clear it was no more than him spit balling.I don't know why people expect guys like Freidman to only report on facts. Speculation is a huge part of sports media, and at least Freidman is still intentional with making sure it is obvious what is rumour and what is speculation if you actually get information from him first hand.
They are always other teams to trade with for better return.Durzi, Turcotte and a ‘24 1st is extremely lowball.
Correct.They are always other teams to trade with for better return.
Spence, Walker, ‘24 1st, ‘23 2nd is fair in my opinion.Not really up to date on Kings prospects… what about…
Spence, Kaliyev, Walker, ‘24 1st, ‘23 2nd
To low?
to high?
I can't believe that i have to type this out.That is a moronic take. If the Kings are trading for Chychrun, it by definition means they want him. Trying to paint his value as "we don't want him, but we'll pay this for him" is just asininely stupid. It's a fantasy scenario that makes literally no sense.
You're not a GM, what you want to do doesn't matter. What matters is what the Kings would pay for Chychrun, and if they're trading for him, it obviously means they want him.
Kaliev is a non starterNot really up to date on Kings prospects… what about…
Spence, Kaliyev, Walker, ‘24 1st, ‘23 2nd
To low?
to high?
Hmm Chychrun averages about 60-65 games a season. Is that a concern?
I support this porposal.The Coyotes should take a page from the Nordiques and trade him twice and let the league figure it out.
uhmm... every proposal starts with his injurie concerns and his salary is secondaryIt is, but that contract is a beauty. Probably most people are willing to overlook the injury history.
Not even close.Spence, Walker, ‘24 1st, ‘23 2nd is fair in my opinion.
Bjornfot was never going to be some stud offensive defenseman, his ceiling is likely a good second-pairing guy. He was also taken at 23rd overall. Kupari was taken 20th overall. Thomas was taken at 51st overall. It seems a bit disingenuous to lump those guys in with players like Byfield, Clarke, Turcotte, and Vilardi.I think it's a bit weird to flex on Vilardi being good (which he is) as being proof that fans on here are wrong about the Kings, while not mentioning that guys like Kupari, Turcotte, Bjornfot and Byfield haven't really shown the kind of progression you'd want out of where they were taken.
Just looking as an outsider, I think LA's drafting and developing recently has been more misses than hits. Anderson, Vilardi, Kaliyev, and Spence seem to be the most promising, but Kupari, Turcotte, Bjornfot, Byfield, Thomas (I remember he was super hyped back in the day) and Grans really don't appear to be progressing/didn't end up progressing as you wanted them to.
uhmm... every proposal starts with his injurie concerns and his salary is secondary
Of course it is… Makar plus a 1st more likeFair enough. Wasn't meant to be a slight of LA fans just a quick message. Bottom line is it was just a way of demonstrating how equating Clarke to Makar is some big time dumbshittery. Agreed?