If damn near every D man on a team is underperforming, maybe coaching is the problemSchneider and Jones.
Fox has had easily his worst season. He’s only doing his job by virtue of that his level can’t drop that much because he’s just a great hockey player.
The bad thing is everyone on defense underperforms except the two young guys who play the least.
I could be misremembering.. but didnt the Rangers waive Goodrow and then trade compensation to the Sharks for taking him? Maybe even a prearranged move?
I dont know if that happens here as well. But if it does; is that considered circumvention of the NTC? Would the league or NHLPA allow it to happen twice?
Controversial in the sense that it's sort of a workaround to NTCs. Whole idea of NTCs is that you have some control over your destination if you get traded. If management can say "we're going to waive you if you don't accept a trade to one of these teams on your NTC list", then that defeats the purpose of the NTC list. Not much Trouba can do about it now, but it's something that players (and the union) will likely keep in mind for the future.
Wouldn't even try to argue with anything you've written, and I understand the frustration that Ranger fans must have, seeing as he's not doing them any favors here. What I won't do, is blame him for prioritizing his family over the team.Can't hate on the guy for using his NTC, gaming his NTC to his advantage, and wanting to stay in New York. That's what's in his contract and what he thinks is best for himself and his family. That being said, when you start hearing reports (from multiple people) that teams are shying away from trading for him because he doesn't want to leave and won't be happy I don't think it's too difficult to figure out who's putting that out there and for what reason.
There was no follow-up, San Jose claimed Goodrow and that was that. A lot of people thought there must have been something else brewing to make the Sharks claim him, but nothing happened.I could be misremembering.. but didnt the Rangers waive Goodrow and then trade compensation to the Sharks for taking him? Maybe even a prearranged move?
I dont know if that happens here as well. But if it does; is that considered circumvention of the NTC? Would the league and/or NHLPA allow it to happen twice?
Panarin is not bad in the regular season.Trouba is the least bad of the 3 and is being scapegoated when the real problem is the $20m in useless forwards
Ahahaha, that's so cute.Blame Uncle Larry, but Garrioch already refuted it
No, that was St. Louis sending Edmonton something extra for not matching.I could be misremembering.. but didnt the Rangers waive Goodrow and then trade compensation to the Sharks for taking him? Maybe even a prearranged move?
I dont know if that happens here as well. But if it does; is that considered circumvention of the NTC? Would the league and/or NHLPA allow it to happen twice?
I wonder if he gets claimed only to get traded later.
I can't see him wanting to go to Montreal or Columbus or Utah for example.
I'm in the minorty I'd like to have him but not at 8 million.
I'd take him at 4 million though especially if we could send a little money back.
Are you referring to a guy who’s over PPG this season and scored 120 pts last season ?Trouba is the least bad of the 3 and is being scapegoated when the real problem is the $20m in useless forwards
The thing is that he still sucks now. There’s no claim anymore that he still has an ankle problem. He’s just bad.Playing on a broken ankle. It has been brought up before in the offseason but not a lot of guys are playing through what Trouba was in the playoffs last year.
Hey power to you. If they can get value for Trouba go for it. Hope it's not my team but there's always one sucker out there.I mean if there are teams actively interested in trading for him and the Rangers are threatening waivers, there's a decent change it's a Goodrow situation. So if Drury knows someone would take him off waivers, why eat 50% of his deal?
But that's just me speculating since Drury set the precedent for that already.
Ahh okay, I got it all mixed up; my memory is terribleNo, that was St. Louis sending Edmonton something extra for not matching.
The Rangers and Sharks haven't made a trade since 2022
Nope. That definitely would have been a contract breach.
Got it confused with the Edmonton-St Louis debacle.. my bad!There was no follow-up, San Jose claimed Goodrow and that was that. A lot of people thought there must have been something else brewing to make the Sharks claim him, but nothing happened.
If damn near every D man on a team is underperforming, maybe coaching is the problem
Ahahaha, that's so cute.
garrioch refuting it concerns me more than brooks article hahaBlame Uncle Larry for that rumor, but Garrioch already refuted it
Oh man, don't forget we had Bruce Garrioch and Pierre Dorion AND Eugene Melnyk for a long time here. I double down on knowing the feelingYeah, well, when your GM is Chris "Little League Hero" Drury and your top beat writer is Larry "I was Popular at the Bus Stop" Brooks, you know you have a great atmosphere.
A stoppable force meets a movable pbjectgarrioch refuting it concerns me more than brooks article haha
garrioch is normally wrong
I'm referring to a guy that's done f*** all in the playoffs most of his careerAre you referring to a guy who’s over PPG this season and scored 120 pts last season ?