Jacob Trouba Elbow On Rodrigues (Fined 5,000 Dollars)

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
No it doesn't. You all would make absolutely terrible judges in a court of law and are way too emotional about this. What Trouba did in the past has nothing to do with what his intent was here. You look at what happened in the play in a vacuum and then decide guilt or innocence. When it comes to punishing him, after it reviewing the play, then you can take past acts into account.
Matt Cooke is a clean player too, oh no don't judge him on all the dirty plays he did before! They don't matter!
 
  • Like
Reactions: cptjeff
That's leadership
1716923808424.gif
 
It also leads to not suspending a really dirty play for long enough with the "well, he hasn't been suspended for X number of months, so we can't just throw a 10 game suspension at him now" excuse.

I remember that was the excuse of the DoPS for Wilson a while back when he finally did something that warranted a multi-game suspension. They cited his lack of suspensions prior as a reason for only X amount of games rather than Y, not realizing that the reason he hadn't had suspensions is BECAUSE they were so soft on his dirty plays prior to that.

Look at Trouba now. Because this only resulted in a fine, then his next dirty act will be his "first" dirty act according to the DoPS.
Except he was suspended this very calendar year for elbowing to the head.....so I guess your theory doesn't really hold up.
 
Trouba didn’t hit him in the head until after hitting his shoulder, though. If it was straight to the head, both he and Erod would probably be missing some games.
You can’t say definitely intent to injure without previous bias towards Trouba. Look at the play with no names and it’s simply a defender caught badly out of position making a desperate (reckless, maybe) attempt to defend his net.
Hockey happened let’s go on to game 4
well thats certainly one way of looking at it
 
Matt Cooke had a history book full of suspensions. Not the best comparison.
Back when the DOPS was run by somebody who gave a shit, yes. Trouba would have a similarly long rap sheet of suspensions if the old regime was still in charge of DOPS. Trouba has an extensive history of extremely dirty play, and to deny that is not exactly a credible position to take.
 
not even remotely close to his head thee bud, they aren't the same

The only reason they "aren't the same" is because Rodrigues missed even worse than Trouba did. He was somehow out of position even further than Trouba when he reached.

These are identical plays. Stop it. This is silly at this point. The tortured logic required to get to your position isn't even worth debating.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TheUnusedCrayon
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad