The "hype" is generated mostly by analysts who need something to talk about on TSN and NHL Network, I feel, as well as excited Bruins fans who want to see the team get better. I think Garland is a good type of player for several reasons, one of which is his confidence to try and make plays all night regardless of success or not. Garland isn't the type to slump if things don't go his way or he makes a bad turnover or play, he just gets back on the horse and goes for it again. He shoots, he passes and he scores. Garland has been standing out in Arizona, what do you think he can do is Boston with this collection of talent, coaching and stability that he's yet to see in the NHL?
I like Palmieri as much as the next guy, but that seems like a buying low option on someone who's a bit older, more experienced and more tamed, if you will. Adding someone like Garland is buying high on a guy who's valuable now, tomorrow and the future. Not only that, but it adds an element and dynamic that this group is missing at the moment which is someone to come in and make the complacent guys feel the heat. Make them start to question their security in the lineup and on this team. I think many forwards are too complacent here right now and adding a young guy who isn't afraid to take charge on the ice would help out in that regard, IMO.