Keeping Grichuk and his $10+ million as a 4th OF and trading someone who finished in the top-3 in Cy Young voting as recently as 2020 seems to be lacking in any discernible logic
Everyone knows Roark came off their payroll this year, right? That's $12 million. And Dickerson was another $9 or so.
Well, good thing I didn't actually say they should dump Ryu over Grichuk. That was actually a misread on your part. All I said was that it would be easier to dump Ryu, because, you know, they tried to trade Grichuk before and nobody wanted him, NOT that in a "keep Grichuk or Ryu scenario, always keep Grichuk". That's ridiculous especially given the current pitching situation (but, hey, if they QO'd Matz like I suggested, it wouldn't be that big an issue, now, would it?).
And, really, if they had a chance to get an equivalent level pitcher for the same amount of money, are you telling me they shouldn't go for it? And let's not forget a good bit of Ryu's success last year was the result of the season ending before he got fatigued. This year it didn't, and literally one bad start cost them the playoffs.
And you really shouldn't question my logic. My logic has routinely proven to be right with scary accuracy. I know, a lot of people around here will deny it, but that's what sore losers do. I was talking about this EXACT SAME SITUATION long before you guys ever even considered it. I just figured it would be Berrios who walked over Ray, and OF COURSE Matz was going to walk, heh.
I think his point is that Toronto shouldn't trade Grichuk for pieces that don't fit. At worst, he's an overpaid good clubhouse guy.
False. My point was the current outfield situation is terrific at best and solid at worst and shouldn't be tweaked over $10 million. When Springer gets injured, and he will, then you will want a guy who can potentially put up big numbers. Or you can have Palacios or some speedy waiver claim who...won't. Sorry, guys, but league average players do not sign 4th outfielder contracts. Only 4th outfielder caliber players do and they're 4th outfielders for a reason.
I mean, unless you actually believe Dickerson can play the outfield. Now there's money better spent elsewhere.
The infield situation is actually similar. A full season of Springer (hopefully) and an upswing (literally and figuratively) from Jansen will take care of Semien's lost production. Not like we HAVE to have all-stars at every position. Plenty of well above average production on this team, and they were figuring out how to hit in the clutch more consistently come September.
The only REAL problem is the pitching, but, again, they have the means to address it with what they have. They have some money. They have tantalizing young players to deal (and still have some leftover for themselves), and their bullpen...well, bullpens are voodoo so who knows, but it they still have the more interesting options and it isn't exactly normal to lose half your best relievers at the beginning of the season.