Should we really bow out at FMV? We’re talking a 25 year old who can play physical, brings size and decent production and who actually wants to play here. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a player like that wanting to be a Hab unless they’re past their prime.
Lol. Plenty of guys have picked up their last NHL cheque from the Habs.
Okay, so an extended PLD. Best comparable may be Eichel.
So Eichel was going to have surgery. Eichel in a contract with term and $10M per. Eichel had hit 36 goals and 78 points and 82 points with Sabres, much better than PLD.
So negative because of the surgery favours PLD. PLD for more years in all likelihood So favours him. Eichel has produced more favours Eichel as a 1C v PLD a 2C.
Eichel and a 3rd got a top 10 protected 1st, a young player Krebs with upside ( drafted at 17th ) and a 20 goal ( at the time ) power forward in Tuch.
So for us a similar package might be our top 10 protected 2024, Owen Beck and Josh Anderson. I would say we need to add another good prospect or the 31st to make up for Krebs higher value.
So do we add or discount for PLD ? Eichel is the better player, but we will have PLD for 8 years and there is no discount for surgery.
I'm thinking FMV is PLD and a 2nd for our 2024 1st, top 10 protected, Beck and Anderson and Dvorak.
I will note I hate trading future 1sts and top 10 protected is only for that year, and I love Beck. But I think that's about FMV. I added Dvorak and the 2nd , but trade could happen without those pieces.
I would keep those assets and not trade for PLD until at least after the draft because I want them available in case we have a chance to move around.
Doesn't seem like a bad price, but we have 2 top 6Cs, and may be adding a potential top C prospect, should we not keep the assets and look for top D potential players ?