I never said he was going to be useless what the f*** are you smoking? If you care that much, what kind of assets would you trade for a player who is going to sign with us for free according to the reports?
I just think that the reports are just convenient for click bait and unproven, all based on hearsay.
As a human being, I would assume that, even if Dubois was an unapologetic fan of the Habs and everything associated with the team, that it was his life long dream to play for the HABS, he'd best respond to the Habs showing they have a reciprocal desire for him.
That would be a good start to the relationship between the player and the team and could help make contract negotiations for a long term extension more fluid.
As they mused on 98.5 fm, after the game, Winnipeg is looking for a RHD of the future that can play now or very shortly at the NHL level?
Is Barron a good enough candidate for them?
I don't know, but I would be willing to include him in a trade, even if, since his recall to Montreal from Laval, he is playing better and better and actually on pace for a 37-point season (full season) as a rookie.
I have more interest in Mailloux's potential, despite the rumours that Winnipeg were scouting him just recently. I would not sacrifice Mailloux, on the right side, for Dubois.
I have less of a problem sacrificing Barron because I always thought that we would need to acquire a more physical, two-way RHD with better shutdown abilities than Barron because this RHD would be a pairing partner for Hutson, in the end.
I suspect that Harris could be an adequate 3rd pairing RHD (as a Lefty) to play with Xhekaj once we had become a contending roster.
That or Engström.
I suspect that Winnipeg would also want a Center who could play in the NHL within a short time frame?
From Montreal, there would be two candidates:
Beck, whose organization, from the start of the year, was willing to trade him because they didn't believe he would be returning to Juniors next season.
Mesar, who already played professional hockey overseas, I believe.
Both players are natural Centers and, regarding Mesar, Rob Ramage had gone on record to state that the Habs would like to develop Mesar as a C.
Mesar is a more offensive C and Beck is a two-way, shutdown C with offensive upside.
I'd be willing to offer one of Beck or Mesar, plus Barron, the equivalent of two first round choices, but this would take the Florida 1st rounder off the table. I'd add Montreal's 2nd rounder in 2023 (around 37th to 39th OA, depending on the lottery results for this year's draft) and a roster player with term remaining from Dvorak or Armia as decided by Winnipeg.
I'm pretty confident in Montreal's C-line skill level after adding Dubois, plus more confident in how more physically imposing the top-6 will become in doing as much.
All three of Suzuki, Dubois and Dach are, IMO, legitimate top-6 Cs and their continued progress, because they are still only 24, 23 and 22, respectively, will determine whom really stands out as a #1 Center throughout their prime years. For the moment, I believe it is a 1A, 1B, 1C scenario, with one C playing on the wing and adding quality insurance in case of an injury to one of the other two top-6 Cs.
Your answer is:
Dubois
VS
Barron + Beck/Mesar + Dvorak/Armia + MON 2023 2nd round pick.
I'm pretty sure that Montreal, with their own 1st round pick, will get a chance at selecting a good C, even if it is Dvorsky should we slip back to 7th, 8th or 9th OA with our own pick because of the lottery. Dvorsky could well be a solid 3rd pairing C on an offensive exploitation line for a roster built on the strength of their top-9 and a strong overall D.
Is it a lot to offer for Dubois?
Yes and no.
Getting rid of Dvorak or Armia is advantageous for Montreal because they shed a contract with term. Hoffman disappears on his own at the end of next season. As does Edmundson if we aren't able to move him for 50% of his remaining Cap.
We'd basically have one of Dvorak or Armia and Gallagher, plus Savard left as veterans we would inevitably want to move. Both Armia and Dvorak only have one season left to their contracts after next year. Holding onto one for that remaining term won't be a huge problem. Savard remains useful on the right side for two more years at 3.5M as well.
Gallagher is the one bad veteran contract we will need to live with.
Where it hurts os in giving up one of Mesar or Beck, but the team has enough depth now and soon, to handle the loss of one of these prospects without putting the rebuild in jeopardy.
The second round pick, like any pick, can become a home run, but, honestly, l the odds of that happening wth a 37th to 39th pick are rather low.
With the Florida pick, I would hopefully be able to select a quality RHD, or I'd use the pick to target and trade for a young RHD such as Grans (or better), a smooth, big-bodied, minute-munching RHD with upside.
IMO, this gives us a RHD ready to play in the NHL next season, after two season in the AHL, to replace Barron, with Mailloux likely ready the following year after a full season in Laval.
This may accelerate the rebuild somewhat, but, after a 1st OA pick, plus a 26th OA pick in 2022 and some excellent 2nd round picks that same draft (Beck and Hutson), another top-10 pick in 2023 and another 1st round pick used to nab a quality RHD prospect that os NHL ready, I still think that we miss the playoffs one last time next season and end up with a top-15 pick to complement the prospect pool depth in 2014.